Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Gata Kamsky vs Alexander Khalifman
Ch World FIDE (play-off) (1999) (rapid), Las Vegas, NV USA, rd 2, Aug-05
Russian Game: Classical Attack. Chigorin Variation (C42)  ·  1/2-1/2



explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Kamsky/Khalifman games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-16-04  weepingwarrior: Here's a neat game with the "Bishop Pair" verses the "Knight Pair". Even though the game is drawn, I feel the the Knight Pair won a small battle. I think Lasker would have been proud of the way Mister Khalifman handled those critters. Bravo!
Jun-17-04  600POUNDGORILLA: Khalifman is vastly underrated. He's capable of playing ANY master on earth to a draw or better. Khalifman is also very interesting to talk to, he's not a one trick pony.
Jun-17-04  acirce: <Khalifman is vastly underrated. He's capable of playing ANY master on earth to a draw or better.> Most 2668'ers are that. Why do you think he's underrated, btw? Has he not deserved the results he has got? Has his opponents been cheating?
Jun-17-04  600POUNDGORILLA: I think Khalifman is underrated because he's not mentioned when strong GMs are mentioned. Khalifman is up there with the best of them.

As far as "rating" goes, which is what you think I meant, ratings mean NOTHING. You have beaten masters, yes? Do you REALLY think you are a better player than they are? But you beat them. Rating means nothing without context. And Khalifman shows up to play when it matters..just look at his results vs top players. Khalifman/Kramnik= +0/-0/=3, Vs. Karpov +4/-3/=2, Kaspy +0, -3, =6, Shirov +1,-1, =8, Kamsky +2, -1, =1, Topalov +2, -1, =2, Polgar +2, -2, =4. Clearly this guy is a topnotch player, only Kaspy has an advantage.

Jun-17-04  PinkPanther: Anand destroyed him, like 11 to 0.
Jun-17-04  acirce: <I think Khalifman is underrated because he's not mentioned when strong GMs are mentioned.> Okay, I partly agree.

<As far as "rating" goes, which is what you think I meant, ratings mean NOTHING.> Well, of course it does. Ratings reflect your performances, and thereby indirectly your strength; far from perfect, but on the whole they work. A 2600 player is almost always better than a 2400 player etc.

<Khalifman/Kramnik= +0/-0/=3, Vs. Karpov +4/-3/=2, Kaspy +0, -3, =6, Shirov +1,-1, =8, Kamsky +2, -1, =1, Topalov +2, -1, =2, Polgar +2, -2, =4.> You're taking those statistics from the database, right? I wouldn't trust it, it is way too incomplete. Anyway, you are leaving out Anand, who has 11 wins and 0 losses against Khalifman in this base! And Leko has 3-1, not counting draws. So if we judge after this base, he has only one win against the top 4 rated players, compared to 17 losses.

Jun-17-04  600POUNDGORILLA: Take anand and Kasparov out of those figures and what do you have? Who hasn't been dominated by those 2 guys? Btw..that Anand stat looks pretty "fluky" to me.
Jun-17-04  acirce: <Who hasn't been dominated by those 2 guys?> Of course! Any player who are substantially worse than Anand and Kasparov will be dominated by them. <Btw..that Anand stat looks pretty "fluky" to me.> 11 wins and 0 losses is no fluke, but it could be that some Anand fan happened to add exactly these games and not all the ones Khalifman won... not likely in this case though, but in principle you shouldn't trust the stats blindly just as I said in my previous post.
Jun-17-04  600POUNDGORILLA: Good point. I'll take the stats from chessgames at face value though. Maybe Khalifman has beaten him a couple times and the games haven't been posted, but no matter. Kasparov is clearly one of the best ever, and Anand is hardly a slouch by any means. It doesn't diminish the fact that Khalifman is a top master in chess.

To diminish Khalifman would be akin to diminishing Keres achievements. He was a perennial #3 on the world chess stage, after all. I veiw Khalifman at about that level...not THE best..but pretty close.

Another thing to consider...and this may surprise everybody here. The LONGEVITY of Khalifman. He has been playing at the upper tier for about 15 years now. But his success has been so "low key" that hardly anybody knows about the guy. Go over his games and I'm sure you'll agree he's underrated.

Jun-17-04  PinkPanther: There are numerous players who haven't been "dominated" by Anand. Topalov, Gelfand, Short, Kramnik, and Kamsky all come to mind.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Kamsky!
by amadeus
1999 - FIDE World Championship KO Tournament
by amadeus
Match Kamsky!
by xajik

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC