chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Savielly Tartakower vs Alexander Alekhine
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 9, Mar-27
King's Gambit: Accepted. Tartakower Gambit (C33)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 25 more Tartakower/Alekhine games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: A great and complex struggle, hardly free from mistakes by both players, but rich as a great sporting contest.

Neither is Alekhine’s analysis in the tournament book (“New York 1924”, by Alekhine, Alexander, Russell Enterprises © 2008) free from error, one example of which involves such a beautiful tactic (discovered by Fritz) that I feel compelled to post it. At move 29 (where Tartakower actually played 29. Qe4), Alekhine purports to show that "Black could have saved himself more easily" after 29. Qg4, which he notes was "suggested as a winning line by some critics". One line of his analysis goes: 29.Qg4 Rad8 30.Rfe1 f6 (Better would be 30...f5), at which point Alekhine continues his analysis with 31.c6, thereby overlooking a spectacular shot: 31.Qxd7!!, for example: 31. ... Rxd7 32.Re8+ Kf7 33.c6! Qxh5 (wholly inadequate, but Black has nothing better) 34.cxd7 Qxd5 35.d8Q .

Although the tactical pattern is far from identical, when Fritz produced 31.Qxd7!! in the above analysis, I could not help being reminded of 23. Qxd7 in Game 11 of the 1985 World Championship match: Kasparov vs Karpov, 1985 .

Oct-16-09  WhiteRook48: 32 Re1! with a threat of 33 Re8+
Jun-16-12  Howard: Back in 1976, an article in Chess Life and Review (as it was called back then), points out the fact that Tartakower indeed missed a forced win in this game.
Jun-17-12  Nerwal: Tartakower himself thought he missed a forced win in this game at move 29; he wrote in the book on his best games that an amateur had found the interesting idea 29. c6!, the point being that after the obvious reply 29... ♕xc6, white wins in spectacular fashion with 30. ♖e7!! f6 31. ♖xg7!! ♖d6 32. ♖g8+!. 29. c6 ♖d6 30. ♕e4 also seems to lose for black because of 30... f6 31. ♕e2!!; this is a much stronger way to defend the h5 pawn than Tartakower's g4, and the e file invasion with Re7 and Rfe1 will soon be decisive. So there is a strong case for white being actually winning. Modern chess engines also give the line 29. ♕e4 f6 30. d6! ♖ad8 31. ♖e7 ♕xh5 32. ♕c6!, and if 32... ♕g4 then 33. ♕d5! ♕g6 34. ♖xd7 ♖xd7 35. ♖e1! immediately winning.
Sep-27-13  poslednieje: NERWAL The amateur was Baskow.
Dec-11-14  Poisonpawns: I think 7..Bd6 is even stronger for black

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 55 My Best Games of Chess, 1905-1954 by Tartakower
from Publications by Year and Unconfirmed Source 15 by fredthebear
King's gambit accept
by Magusnet
April, p. 88 [Game 74 / 4536]
from American Chess Bulletin 1924 by Phony Benoni
New York 1924
by Benzol
April, p. 88 [Game 74 / 4536] American Chess Bulletin 1924
from White Be2 B-C Winked at Fredthebear by fredthebear
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by vantheanh
Game 23
from Manual of Chess (Lasker) by Qindarka
29.Qg4 Rad8 30.Rfe1 g6 31.Qd4 for instance
from Alekhine was sunk! by Calli
Ninth Round (43)
from Alekhine, A. NEW YORK 1924 by superstoned
Game 55
from My Best Games of Chess, 1905-1954 by Tartakower by suenteus po 147
Game 23
from Manual of Chess (Lasker) by isfsam
andrewwalker's favorite games
by andrewwalker
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by StoppedClock

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC