Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Alexander Alekhine
Capablanca - Alekhine World Championship Match (1927), Buenos Aires ARG, rd 17, Oct-18
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Henneberger Variation (D63)  ·  1/2-1/2



Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [20742 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 48 more Capablanca/Alekhine games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-01-04  Ernesto7: It's amazing the overwhelming power of bishops in an open game.. I bet Capablaca was dissapointed since he couldn't make progress and was obviously playing for a win.
Dec-16-06  Gouki: alekhine unable to convert despite having the bishop pair at his disposal. but then again, he is playing against the great Capablanca! so its only natural :D
Aug-09-07  Dr. Siggy: As <Ernest7> writes, Capablanca was indeed playing for a win in this particular game!

Yet, according to Eugene Znosko-Borovsky, "How to Play Chess Endings", english translation, New York 1940, pages 218-9: "If anything, the Bishops are even more valuable in compromised positions, in which their defensive powers shine to advantage. In Diag. 119 [= after Black's 39th move], the black pawns are extremely weak, and the Bishops lack important diagonals, whereas the white Knights not only have good attacking positions, but they boast of admirable strong points. In addition, White has a distant passed pawn. Nevertheless, White does not succeed in winning the game, for the Knights are handicapped by the fact that, as soon as they move, the Bishops would instantly gain freedom of action, as their pawns would be able to move. To afford the Bishops open lines would be dangerous, and White must rest content with maintaining his present advantageous position, and, for want of anything better, undertake aimless manoeuvres."

The story is told that, right after this draw, Capablanca muttered: "If I couldn't win this game, I can't win this match..." By then, it was too late! Not only he didn't win this game but he even went to lose the match...

Mar-03-08  Knight13: 44...f5+! is a very nice move.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Advancing the k-side pawns did not work. What other plan did Capablanca have? One idea might be to play 31. Kf1 and transfer the King to c2 in order to guard b2. This would free his d2 rook. What do you think? Any other ideas for White in this game or are Black's bishops sufficient to defend all those weak pawns.
Mar-01-12  The Curious Emblem: 14. Bb1 looks good as well. The Bishop would seem more happy after moving to a2, putting pressure on the hanging pawns. White can then follow up with Rd2-Rcd1, piling up on d5 and indirectly weakening c4. But, unfortunately, Black has the ... a5-Ba6 countermeasure, as well as the ... c4-Nc5, ... a5-a4, Nc5-b3 plan that will put a bind on White's position. Thus, the c2 square is a better place for the Holy Man.
Nov-30-13  Owl: Despite having a passed h-pawn and opponent having a double pawns. The 2 knights cannot win against the 2 bishops. If this was reverse the the 2 Bishops would win
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: After 18...Bc6

click for larger view

A dynamic position from this very conservative match.

After 39...Kg4

click for larger view

See the superb Aug-09-07 post by <Dr. Siggy>.

Dec-01-13  jdc2: Are there any mistakes in this game, even
minor ones? I just did a blunder check with Fritz on both sides (threshold 100) and couldn't find anything (using Stockfish 4 64 at 20 sec per). I know that some people like to claim that the older players weren't as good as today, but it sure seems like at least some of them were.
Oct-09-16  Allanur: 42. Nd6 could have been win for white. if you have engines, can you analyse it?

of if you have analysis you think to refute 42. Nd6, can you share?

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Allanur>
At first glance, 42. Nd6 <Bxc3> looks strong for Black, if then 43. bxc3 <d4+>. Could you post more details about your idea for White?
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: Again, Capa avoids a melee:

20. Nd4 Bb7 21. Bf5 b4 22. axb4 Bxb4 23. b3 Ne5 24. Bxf6 gxf6 25. Nce2

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: If I recall correctly a Russian IM did an extensive analysis of this game, concluding Capablanca should have won. I can't remember his name. Is anyone familiar with this?
Sep-10-19  smendel: The computer thinks 25. Ra1 was Capa's best chance.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
by sk.sen
from Alekhine: On the road to the World Championship by Chessdreamer
17. The amazing drawing power of the bishop pair !
from 1927 Alekhine-Capablanca WC match by aragorn69
Game 17, Alekhine leads 3-2 (9-8)
from 1927 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
QID: Orthodox Def. Henneberger Var (D63) 1/2-Ns vs Bs Stockfish
from EG Minors Excavating the Elements by fredthebear
35_BB vs NN - the Squeeze
by whiteshark
Match Alekhine!
by chessgain
December, p. 197 [Game 76 / 4698]
from American Chess Bulletin 1927 by Phony Benoni
17. The amazing drawing power of the bishop pair !
from 1927 Alekhine-Capablanca WC match by brucemubayiwa
BB + PP vs NN + PP: unbalanced PP; drawing chances.
from Endgame themes. by Dr. Siggy
Capablanca vs Alekhine WCM 1927
by ilcca
Game 79
from World Champion - Alekhine (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Match Capablanca!
by amadeus
Art of War's favorite games 7
by Art of War
Match Alekhine!
by amadeus

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC