chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Alexander Alekhine
Capablanca - Alekhine World Championship Match (1927), Buenos Aires ARG, rd 31, Nov-18
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern. Knight Defense (D51)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 48 more Capablanca/Alekhine games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-17-02  Sabatini: Playing 37. a5 over 37. h4 could have cost JR Capablanca this game and his world championship.
Mar-30-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: 37. h4 looks better, but the real clunker is 40. Rc8? 40.Bd6 keeps up the pressure. A bad endgame at a critical moment by Capa.
Jul-29-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: Was 27...Qb7 a miscalculation? How about 27...Qa7 (so the knight won't get pinned in 28. Bxd5 Rxd5 29. Qxb4 Nxd4). I don't think Black has anything to fear in 27...Qa7 28. Bxb5, since White's queenside pawns are just as exposed as Black's. Did Black actually need to lose a pawn as with 27...Qb7?
Jul-29-04  acirce: That 37.a5 was a serious mistake has been thought for a long time but a certain Garry Kasparov begs to differ. From 'On My Great Predecessors' I:

<37.a5!?

Alekhine attaches a question mark to this move and recommends 37.h4, 'to disable the opposing kingside and then, with the necessary precautions, to bring the king to the queenside. This plan would have reduced Black's drawing chances to the minimum.'

The verdict of Levenfish and Romanovsky is no less severe: 'The pawn stood better at a4 than at a5, since now Black gains control of the b5-square, which is the key to the position. Correct was 37.Ke2 g5 38.h3 h5 39.Rc8 Rb7 40.Rb8 Rxb8 41.Bxb8 Ke7 42.Kd3 Kd7 43.Kc4 Kc6 44.b4! Nb6+ 45.Kb3 Kd5 46.b5 axb5 47.a5! Nd7 48.Be5 winning.'

However, in 1994(!) the Russian master Fridstein accomplished a complete revolution in the evaluation of this ending, beginning with a criticism of this last variation: 'The analysis was terminated too early: after 48..Nxe5! 49.dxe5 Kc5 the pawn ending is drawn! However, instead of 48.Be5? White wins by 48.Bc7! In turn, Black should not play 45..Kd5?! - after 45..g4 it is not at all easy to show that White has a win. But the main thing is that White has no reason to exchange his active rook for the opponent's passive rook! Instead of 39.Rc8?! it is not too late to transpose into a position from the game by 39.a5! The point is that 'the key to the position' is not the b5-square, but the b6-square!'

Perhaps 37.h4 was indeed simpler, since it would have deprived Black of any counterplay. However, the move in the game was not at all bad, as we shall see.>

Jul-29-04  acirce: <the real clunker is 40. Rc8? 40.Bd6 keeps up the pressure.> The winning move is 40.Rb6!! according to Fridstein and Kasparov.
Jul-29-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Yes, 27...Qb7? is a mistake. Probably thought he would regain the pawn. Alekhine gives 27...Nbc3! 28.a3 Ne4 29.Qd3 a5 30.f3 Nd6 as equal but I am not sure about that either.
Jul-29-04  acirce: Let's listen to Kasparov again :-) He doesn't agree with Alekhine because

<firstly, there is a rather promising exchange sacrifice - 29.Rxe4!? fxe4 30.axb4 Ra8 31.Qg5 Rd7 32.b5 a5 33.Qg4, and secondly, White retains an enduring plus after 29.Qd3 a5 30.f3 Nd6 31.Bxd5 exd5 32.axb4 Qxb4 33.Re3 or 31.axb4 Nxc4 32.bxc4 Nxb4 33.Qb3.>

Apr-16-06  emolasker: I have got that book, very goog for reading while sitting on toilet.:-)
May-25-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: After 40.Rb6, which is better than 40.Rc8


click for larger view

Then play might go 40...Nxb6 41.axb6 Rb7 42.Bc7


click for larger view

Black's rook is stalemated. White's king can win the k-side pawns. Black could give back the exchange but then his king would be at c7 and white's would be at f4 and


click for larger view

white would win.

Mar-03-08  Knight13: I like Black better in the final position. He should trade on h3 and play on, since White's bishop can't touch Black's pawns and Black seems to have a pretty decent knight.
Jul-12-08  Alphastar: a pawn is a pawn, <Knight13>, and you would also agree to a draw if your opponent were Capablanca and you were leading the match by 1 point with 3 games remaining.
Aug-04-09  WhiteRook48: these guys drew too much
Feb-26-12  RookFile: <Alphastar: Alphastar: a pawn is a pawn, <Knight13>, and you would also agree to a draw if your opponent were Capablanca and you were leading the match by 1 point with 3 games remaining. >

There might have been 100 games remaining. You needed 6 wins to take this match, with no limit on the number of games. Capa was only down 4 to 3 here, but had no way of knowing he was about to lose 2 games soon.

Dec-02-13  Owl: Capablanca theorems RB superior to RN and Bishop stronger than Knight in the endgame are proven wrong here by Alekhine.

But if shows that if Capablanca had the other color Bishop he would of won

Nov-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: No doubt that Capa preferred bishops to knights. At least, no doubt after seeing this game.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 107
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by isfsam
Capablanca vs Alekhine WCM 1927
by ilcca
Buenos Aires, World Championship
from Alexander Alekhine Games, 1925-1929 by MonsieurL
Game 107
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by AdrianP
Game 107
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Match Alekhine!
by amadeus
40.Bd6 and if Rb7 41.b4 Nxb4 42.Rb6 for instance
from Alekhine was sunk! by Calli
31. Capa fails again to convert a winning endgame
from 1927 Alekhine-Capablanca WC match by brucemubayiwa
Game 107
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Match Alekhine!
by chessgain
Game 107
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Grizmors
Game 107
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Game 107
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by StoppedClock
January, p. 6 [Game 5 / 4983]
from American Chess Bulletin 1928 by Phony Benoni
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Capa's last slip
from Exciting, Original, Unusual And Other Draws by T by Octavia
Game 107
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by demirchess
97
from Alekhine: On the road to the World Championship by Chessdreamer
Arod333's favorite games
by Arod333


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC