Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alexander Alekhine vs Jiri Podgorny
Prague (1943), Prague CSR, rd 17, Apr-26
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation. Barmen Defense (B22)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 61 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Alekhine/J Podgorny game
sac: 12.axb4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-22-03  marekg248: Comments on this game are at (plus one Capablanca's game).
Aug-20-06  Helios727: Why the resignation?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <Helios727>
Conel Hugh O'Donel Alexander in his book on Alyekhin says "A rather sudden resignation, but there is little to do. If 28...h6; 29.♗e3 ♘c4; 30.♗d4 (threat 31.♘f6+) 30...♖d8; 31.♘c5 (threat 32.♘d7 followed by ♘4f6+) 31...♔f8; 32.b3 ♘d6; 33.♗g7+ or 33.♘a6 winning easily in either case."
Aug-17-12  csmath: The whole opening was played with such a force it is hard to sustain the level of play, Podgorny was tired in a rather hapless ending. But what is more interesting is that Alekhine amazingly decided against

15. Qb5

which is obvious move.

That is a stroke of genius! Even though the move leads to a solid advantage the path he has chosen is simpler. Not too many times has Alekhine chosen simpler path unless it led to a forced win. This is one example. His ability to evaluate positions properly was just plain uncany. It is as god has been playing this game.

I think this was the impression of Podgorny "there is no way I can save this."

Oct-24-13  davide2013: I was stunned by the resignation. I let Houdini run for about 8 minutes, and this is the result:

28...Na4 29.h3 h6 30.Ng3 Rc4 31.Nf5 Nc5+ 32.Nxc5 Rxc1 33.Nb3 Rg1 34.Ne3 f6 35.Nd4 Kf7 36.Kc2 h5 37.f4 g4 38.hxg4 hxg4 39.Kb3 Re1 40.Nef5 Rd1 41.Kxb4 Rd2 42.g3 Rxb2+ 43.Kc5 Rd2 44.Kxd5 Rd3 45.Ke4 Rc3 46.Nd6+ Ke7 47.N6b5 Rc4 $20 +0.43
At the end of this line there is an endgame of 2 knights and pawns, vs rook and pawns, if Black exchanges the pawns, white will never win.

Oct-25-13  aliejin: "I was stunned by the resignation. I let Houdini run for about 8 minutes, and this is the result:"

IF you are going to be "stunned" every time that a real line of some game has a different result than a computer ..... you will be "stunned" the rest of your life

Even more, if you are going to be "stunned" every time that a line of a computer changes with the new releases.... you will be "stunned" the rest of your life again

Real Chess and software world are not the same.
Software is just a guide that must be interpreted.

Nov-01-13  davide2013: Obviously I was "stunned" by the resignation, because I wouldn't resign in such position. I would have continued to play, and draw the game. And Houdini, who is however rated 3300, quite above any living or dead GM. Didn't consider such position lost too. Since I don't live inside a chess school, with other GMs, I looked for a confirmation to my judgment of the final position, and someone who is about 1300 points stronger than me, also agreed. Hope you understand now.
Nov-01-13  aliejin: " I was "stunned" by the resignation"

I explained very clearly .....

Nov-01-13  davide2013: So Aliejin apart the sterile troll polemic that you are trying to stir in here. Do you have actually any line which would prove my conclusion (the game is a draw) or Houdini's analysis, wrong?
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Probably Podgorny resigned when he saw his counter attack failing in the line given by CHO'D Alexander beginning with 28...h6 29 Be3 Nc4

click for larger view

when both 30 Bd4 and 30 Nf6+ are winning.

However, the unassuming 29...Nd7

click for larger view

stops that attack, and it is difficult to progress for White without exchanging his bishop for the knight (once it reaches e5). The resulting 2 knights versus rook pawn ending would be tending toward a draw.

Gull 2.2x64 basically confirms that difficulty, showing a consistent .38 to .41 advantage for White but no breakthroughs.

Kasparov gives "28...h6 29 Be3 Nc4 30 Nf6+ Kf8 31 Bc5+ Kg7 32 Bd4 wins" OMGP V1 page 454

I am inclined to believe Kasparov is copying someone else here, which happens a lot at the end of games. Someone resigns in a dangerous looking position, and analysis goes unchallenged for years.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
50. "... complicated tactical problems."
from 107 Great Chess Battles: 1939-45 Alekhine by mjk
Game 148
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1B) by AdrianP
My Great Predecessors: Alexander the Fourth
by grozny
from Alexander Alekhine Games, 1940-1945 by MonsieurL
excellent response variation
from archimedes3003's favorite games by archimedes3003
Game 148
from Garry Kasparov on My Great Predecessors Part 1 by MetalPlastic
Good basic opening sequence.
from Alapin Openings by Bluem00n
11-18: (3) (-) (1) (-)
from AAA tactics by Gypsy
alekhine best games
by brager
simply the best- Alekhine!!!
by Antiochus
Alexander Alekhine's Best Games
by KingG
Alekhine Favorites
by chocobonbon
Alekhine's Best Games 1938-1945
by samsloan
The Giants of Power Play by Neil McDonald
by hms123
Sicilian Alapin
by BabalooMoon
Game collection: B22
by blohmoremoney
by mneuwirth
from Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Alyokhin Attacks by Owl
from Exchange sacs - 4 by obrit
plus 60 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC