chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Viswanathan Anand vs Veselin Topalov
Linares (1998), Linares ESP, rd 13, Mar-08
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation. English Attack Anti-English (B90)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 15 times; par: 141 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 125 more Anand/Topalov games
sac: 34.fxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-22-04  acirce: 17...Ne5 allowed the f3+Bf2 plan, leading to White advantage. Anand suggested 17..Be5! instead with the lines as given in John Nunn's <The Complete Najdorf: Modern Lines> that are all fine for Black:

18.Bxf7 Bxg3 19.fxg3 Qe3

18.Qxg5 Bxg3 19.fxg3 f6 20.Qg7 Qd8 followed by ..Qf8

18.Bxe5 Nxe5 19.Qxg5 Qxf2 20.Qe7 Bg4 21.Qxd6 Bxd1 22.Qxe5 Rh1 23.Qe8+ Kc7 24.Qe7+ draw.

Jun-02-08  Jim Bartle: Anand write that 27. Ba5 was a mistake, even though it wins the black queen, and that 27. c5 was much better.

He says the game was equal until Topalov erred with 33...Rh8.

Aug-11-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 10 Bc4 was new; 10 Qd2 and 10 Be2 had been played previously. 25..Qb7 26 Bc4!..Bxb2 27 Bxa6 would have won for White. Anand felt that 30 Qe3..a5 31 f4..gxf 32 gxf..a4 33 e5 would have been a better plan for White. Seirawan recommended activating the Knight with 30..Ne5 31 f4..gxf 32 gxf..Nc6. 42 Ke2?..Nd4+! would have been losing for White. 57..Nxc4? 58 Bf1 would have lost material.
Sep-25-09  tivrfoa: Why Topalov had to sacrifice the Queen?
Mar-14-10  alexrawlings: <tivrfoa: Why Topalov had to sacrifice the Queen?> Good question, I was just wondering the same thing. I can't see any immediate tactical threats (not to say there aren't any though, just that I can't see any).

Can anyone explain why White sacrifices his queen in this game?

Mar-14-10  yalie: <tivrfoa> & <alexrawlings> you are talking about two different queen sacs - <tivr> wants to know about queen sac by black while <alex> wants to know about white. so they are not the same:) I remember watching this game online on ICC. <tivr> Topalov's alternative on move 28 was not pleasant:

28...Kd8 Nd5+ Ke8 Nf6+ exf6 Rd6 leaves plack in bad shape.

<alex> I agree white could have played 34. Qg2 gxf gxf Nxf Qf1 Bh3 where white is winning but black has chances of a swindle with four pieces all capable of going after the queen. My guess is that Anand saw a relatively safe exchange up line with winning chances after 34 fxg. I vaguely remember some decent GM (Kamsky?) recommending fxg before ICC showed Anand's move. Hope this helps.

Mar-16-10  alexrawlings: Thanks <Yalie>, I didn't realise we were looking a different queen sacs!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Sicillian Defense
by JoseTigranTalFischer
chess white Sicilian Endings 1
by w3uchess
Najdorf - 6. Be3
by pcmvtal
Complex games
by TheDestruktor
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.English Attack Anti-English
from MKD's Sicilian Defense White Compiled by MKD by fredthebear
Linares ESP 1998 Rd.13
from Favorite Games from (1980-1999) by wanabe2000
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.English Attack Anti-English
from MKD's Sicilian Defense White by marchipan
Sicillian Defense
by Zhbugnoimt
Anand's rook endgames
by setuhanu01
Game collection: B90
by woodstriker
admirable anand
by senankit
Round Thirteen, Game #37
from Linares 1998 by suenteus po 147
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.English Attack Anti-English
from MKD's Sicilian Defense White by MKD
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.English Attack Anti-English
from MKD's Sicilian Defense White by Patca63
Complex games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Linares ESP 1998 Rd.13
from Favorite Games from (1980-1999) by Jaredfchess
Chess Oscar 1998: Anand
by SetNoEscapeOn

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC