chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Adolf Anderssen vs Max Lange
Analysis (1859) (probably analysis), Breslau, Germany
Spanish Game: Bird Variation (C61)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 55 times; par: 22 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Anderssen/M Lange games
sac: 9...d3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-03-08  Amarande: I have only ever seen the ending given as <sneaky pete> indicates.

The last time I saw this game was in Renaud & Kahn's <The Art of the Checkmate>, pp. 79-80, where the authors give the variation cited by <sneaky pete> as the actual game variation, and after move 17 there is an annotation that ends with "but one century ago the fight was carried on to the bitter end."

Given that so many of the other memorable games of the time were also carried on to mate (including Anderssen's own two most famous wins) I see no reason to believe that Anderssen himself would have resigned in this game, and am inclined to regard Renaud & Kahn's annotation as true. I have also never seen the ... Rxh5+ variation published in any major book (and I do recall seeing this game in a second book as well but cannot recall the title offhand), which also inclines me to believe that the variation given by Renaud & Kahn and cited by <sneaky pete> as the correct score.

Mar-03-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Again, this is analysis, not a game. Read the Chess Note 3888 which is linked in my post of Oct 23, 2006.
May-14-08  sfairat: Brilliant! It's hard to see where white went wrong. I think white had to accept it can't win a piece and play to equalize. Attack the knight with one more pawn, which I think leads to check and an exchange of two minor pieces for the rook.
Aug-04-08  chessqueenie: why doesn't white take bishop when its forked on move 9???
Aug-04-08  Octal: <chessqueenie>: Analyze the position after 9. fxg4? Qh4+.
Aug-16-08  ravel5184: 9. fxg4? Qh4+ 10. Ke2 d3+! 11. Ke3 (Kxd3 Nf2+, cxd3?? Qf2#) Bc5+ 12. Kf4 g5+ 13. Kf5 Qh6 and mates next.
Aug-19-08  macphearsome: I think white wasted too many moves with its white bishop! most notably

5. Bc4?

just allows black to advance his queen-pawn, developing a bishop and forcing white to play the retreat.

Jan-01-09  YoungEd: Great game by Black, who was on the wrong side of some famous games. To my mind, 9. ...d3 is the star move, clearing the way for the bishop and leaving the pawn fork unaltered. Nice touch at the end, too--the queen move to g5 is to block the g4 pawn, so that it can't avoid a charging Black h5!
Feb-25-09  Bears092: I don't think white should be in any hurry here to take one of the pieces. Maybe 10. Qe1 to cover the f2 square after the king has to move away. (10....Bc5+ 11. Kh1). I don't see a convincing reply.
Feb-25-09  solskytz: Actually the attack is not quite sound. I find ...Ne4 outrageous. This can't work.

White castles in the next move, but after that, if he plays Qe1 on the next move rather than taking on g4, he escapes the pin, puts power into the fork, and covers the squares that later become critical, g3 and h4. He should win big material after this.

Mar-02-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <It's hard to see where white went wrong.> Well, it is not so hard I think. 6.e5 is dubious at first glance and 10.fxg4 is a blunder. Instead of that 10.Qe1 leaves black in troubles.
Apr-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Yeah, what Honza Cervenka said - 10.Qe1 is a known refutation. Black has nothing besides 10...Bc5+ 11.Kh1 Nf2+ 12.Rxf2, when White wins two pieces for a rook. Iakov Neishtadt, Catastrophe in the Opening, p. 170.

What sneaky pete said, too. Neishtadt, like every other source I've seen, gives this game as Anderssen-Lange, 1859. Some other sources say that White played on with 14.gxh5 Qxf5 15.g4 Rxh5+! 16.gxh5 Qe4! 17.Qf3 Qh4+ 18.Qh3 Qe1+ 19.Kh2 Bg1+ 20.Kh1 Bf2+ 21.Kh2 Qg1#.

Apr-19-09  zdiddy: <FSR> Thanks for posting that alternate finish. I was wondering why white wouldn't just play on, but now its obvious that it was a losing scenario no matter what happened.

Why did White delay fxg4 until after the 0-0? To me, that's where things began to go sour.

Apr-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <zdiddy> White didn't want to see 9.fxg4 Qh4+ 10.g3 (10.Ke2? Qf2+ 11.Kd3 Nc5#) Nxg3 11.hxg3 Qxh1+ 12.Ke2 Qg2+ followed by 13...Qxg3+.
Oct-11-09  jon01: It is a really lovely game. I discovered it after researching the theme of Greco's mate.


click for larger view

1. Bc4+ Kh8 2. Ng6+! hxg6 3. Rh1#

Jan-23-10  jejlchess: Why not, after 16.Gxh5...QxH5
Checkmate?
Jan-23-10  xiko9: lol jejlchess look forward to white's queen...just 17. Qxh5
Aug-01-15  Sho: Eastbound 'n down
Jan-15-16  Martin Riggs: I call this 1 "Keine Langeweile (No Boredom)." ;0]
May-08-17  zanzibar: Compare this game to

A Odebrecht vs J Carra, 1985

.

May-08-17  zanzibar: <CG> doesn't seem to have the game, but White wins one with 10.Qe1 being played:

(White to move after 9...d3)


click for larger view

r2qkb1r /ppp2ppp/8/3pP3/4n1b1/1B1p1P2/PPPP2PP/RNBQ1RK1 w - - 0 10

<Breja, Stanislav (2230) -- Oprea, Erik
Slovan Open (1) Slovan open
1993 1-0 C61e>

There's no hurry on the fork once the queen unpins the pawn.

May-08-17  zanzibar: <As regards the twentieth-century publication of the game, Mr Anderberg suggests the following as the likely historical sequence:

‘1. In old age Dufresne showed Harmonist this game, around 1890 – “an Anderssen loss”.

2. In 1902 Harmonist showed the game to Nimzowitsch (a student in Berlin) – “an Anderssen loss, handed down by Dufresne”.

3. Nimzowitsch published the game with the proviso that the players’ names were dubious.

4. Lasker removed all trace of doubt about the game’s authenticity.

5. Finally, Bachmann made up “Berlin, 1851?”.’

Toni Preziuso (Chur, Switzerland) also draws attention to Max Lange’s book Der Meister im Schachspiel and provides the relevant text from page 217:>

C.N. 3888

Dec-12-18  Blue Morphine: I wish he played Morphy.
Apr-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: Here's another sacrificial Max Lange Mating Pattern along the back rank: Lutsko vs S B Berntsen Sahl, 2007
Sep-02-19  Ulhumbrus: In his book <A golden treasury of chess> I A Horowitz says of this game <It is difficult to imagine how one could concentrate more brilliancy, more inspired inventiveness, more sparkle into so short a game. Here is the distilled essence of the very best chess of the old masters : one thrill after another!>
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: ANALYSIS. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Games under 20 moves
by GiantPickle
Renaud & Kahn's The Art of the Checkmate, pp. 79-80
from Basic Foodfight Recipe Catered by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Bird's defence
from Game collection: 18K by fredthebear
"Genuine Pearl".......
from king bee's favorite games by king bee
6
from 99 Schönheitspreise (Steinkohl) by Chessdreamer
Renaud & Kahn's The Art of the Checkmate, pp. 79-80
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by JoseTigranTalFischer
19 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by PinkLedDoor
Bird. Mating Net. 19a
from Ruy Lopez by PinkLedDoor
C4 mating patterns pg 77 Max Lange Mate
from Art of Attack in Chess Vladamir Vukovic & Chess by balasana128
Game 4
from Golden Treasury of Chess (Wellmuth/Horowitz) by Qindarka
ipap's favorite games
by ipap
Novice4 Nips & Old Descriptive Books
by trh6upsz
Games for Classes
by lightchess
Game collection: old
by tomo6
One more miniature...
from Collections in Idleness 6 by Trigonometrist


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC