Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Joseph Henry Blackburne vs Adolf Anderssen
"Face The Muzio" (game of the day Jul-25-2007)
Casual game (1862), London ENG, Jun-??
King's Gambit: Accepted. Muzio Gambit Accepted From Defense (C37)  ·  1-0



Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [20791 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Blackburne/Anderssen games
sac: 5.O-O PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-07-02  drukenknight: your move: 7 Qxf4? is a blunder, it drops your bishop.

Look again at white's 10th. Isnt this a mistake by white?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: I don't think that 7.Qxf4 is a blunder. In fact it is probably the best move in this variation. 7...Qc5+ 8.d4 Qxc4 9.Qe5+ and 10.Qxh8 is not good for black as well as the line mentioned above. That is why 6...Qf6 is considered by theory as better then 6...Qe7.
Oct-08-02  drukenknight: I admit the sequence you show is beautiful. BUt black simply allows white to develop 3 pieces while he makes 3 pawn moves.

So what happens the pawns take the N; a N is 3; 3 black pawns are disconnected okay; and one white pawn is ISO.

White is down 1 pt. in material that is fine because he went first.

BUt he gained like 3 tempos! You can't give the guy 3 moves w/o getting either tons of material or a mating attack. It just doesnt happen.

Blacks entire sequnce is flawed. Probably the game is already lost.

SHow me a game where black is three pieces behind in development w/o getting either a lot more material or some sort of tempo/attack on K. No one plays like that we all know better.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: What about this:

[Event "Opatija"]
[Site "Opatija"]
[Date "1912.??.??"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Aurbach,Arnold"]
[Black "Lowcki,Moishe Leopoldowicz"]

[Result "1-0"]
[Eco "C37"]

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 g4 5.0-0 gxf3 6.Qxf3 Qe7 7.Qxf4 Qc5+ 8.d4 Qxc4 9.Qe5+ Ne7 10.Qxh8 Ng6 11.Qf6 Be7 12.Qg7 Bf8 13.Qf6 Nc6 14.Be3 Nd8 15.Nc3 c6 16.e5 d5 17.exd6 Be6 18.Ne4 Kd7 19.Nc5+ Kxd6 20.b3 Qxc2 21.Bf4+ Kd5 22.Bg3 b6 23.Qf3+ Kxd4 24.Nxe6+ fxe6 25.Rfd1+ Kc5 26.Rac1 Qxc1 27.Rxc1+ Kb5 28.Qd3+ Ka5 29.Be1+ Bb4 30.Bxb4+ Kxb4 31.Qc3+ Ka3 32.b4+ Ka4 33.Qc2+ Kxb4 34.Qc3+ Kb5 35.Qc4+ Ka5 36.Rc3 b5 37.Qc5 Ka6 38.a4 Rb8 39.axb5+ Rxb5 40.Ra3+ Kb7 41.Qxa7+ Kc8 42.Qxh7 Ne5 43.Ra7 1-0

May-25-05  woodenbishop: Interesting miniature. The end game (what little there is) no doubt must have surprised Anderssen, if not amused him.
May-25-05  InspiredByMorphy: Would 16. ...Kh8 have been better?
Jan-08-06  woodenbishop: The more I go over this game the more I am reminded of the magic of Tal (or in this case, Blackburne). Beautiful game!!
May-19-06  ChessPieceFace: what's with 20. ...Qg4? if it was to prevent something, it didn't seem to work.

or did anderssen just never have the chance to continue whatever it was he was trying to do there?

i'm sure i'm missing something simple.

May-19-06  Marmot PFL: 20...Kg8 21 Rxh7 f6 stops the attack. Now Qg4 works - black's king has f7 if needed.

Ponomariov made a similar defensive mistake today against Topalov, in a more complicated position.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <Marmot PFL> You are absolutely right. 20...Kg8! 21.Rxh7 (21.Bf6 Qg4) 21...f6 is much better defense than my previous suggestion 20...Bxh6. Here black not only stays alive but even has some edge.
Jul-25-07  realbrob: I don't think it was a good idea for Black to castle kingside, where White had all its pieces ready to attack. Anderssen should've moved his LSB and castled queenside, maybe. I don't think White's knight sac was good, he doesn't have enough compensation.

One more thing, 18..Nxc4 looks like the usual 19th century move which goes for winning material without realising that it's useless to be up a piece if your opponent has a mating attack. What about 18..Nd6 ? Black looks a bit cramped but maybe his position can hold.

Jul-25-07  karnak64: The note to move one is absolutely precious. "Ivanhoe challenging Bois-Gilbert" indeed!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <realbrob> There was nothing wrong with taking of the piece in move 18. As it was suggested above, 20...Qg4 was a blunder that lost the game while 20...Kg8! (20...Bxh6 was playable too though not so good) 21.Rxh7 f6 would have stopped the attack with advantage and good winning chances for black.
Jul-25-07  Jack Kerouac: <Honza> You doing time on this page? Sentence almost up?
Jul-25-07  tatarch: Yes the note to move one is precious indeed-- I know Blackburne's reputation for puffery, but after reading something like that I wonder if it was all just kind of an inside joke to him.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: It was whimsical how the white rook gobbled up the pawns at g7 and h7. Suddenly black's king was dressed in the "emperor's new clothes".

Mate is inescapable at h8.

Jul-25-07  zb2cr: <ChessPieceFace>,

As others, notably <Honza Cervenka>, have pointed out, the move 20. ... Qg4 is the game-loser. Anderssen obviously underestimated the power of the sacrifice on h7 and was looking to swap Queens to break White's attack. He may have been overconfident against a young Blackburne, thinking that Blackburne would be content to win a second compensatory Pawn with 21. Rxh7+, Kg8; 22. Be7, Qxh4; 23. Rxh4, Re8; 24. Bg5.

Sep-13-08  Dr. J: <Honza> 20 ... Bxh6 is not playable: 21 Qxh6 threatening both 20 Qxf8# and 20 Bf6+.
Jul-14-10  David2009: <Marmot PFL>: 20...Kg8 21 Rxh7 f6 stops the attack.> Also possible is 20...f6 which transposes to <Marmot PFL>'s line.

Nice annotation by Blackburne - of course Anderssen's normal policy was to accept all reasonable gambits against all comers. I have been looking for the games of his 1866 match with Steiniz (lost +6-8=0) and the last game appears to have been Steinitz vs Anderssen, 1866. If this was indeed the final game, then Anderssen played the Kings Gambit Declined for the first time in the match - and lost the game and the match.

Feb-13-14  thomastonk: <London Haringay> as site and event? I don't think so. This was an offhand game played at the St.James's Chess Club (see "The Era", August 8, 1862), and this club resided in the St.James's Hall, Regent's Quadrant.
Nov-05-19  Chesgambit: 19. ? puzzle
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <karnak64: The note to move one is absolutely precious. "Ivanhoe challenging Bois-Gilbert" indeed!>

And what happens when they play a serious game? An Exchange French.

Anderssen vs Blackburne, 1862

Nov-06-19  ughaibu: "we were nothing if not daring in those days, and the cautious modern safety-loving youth of today had not yet been evolved"

I wonder if every generation says this.

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <ughaibu: "we were nothing if not daring in those days, and the cautious modern safety-loving youth of today had not yet been evolved" I wonder if every generation says this.>

Yes, and for the most part each is correct.

Nov-06-19  ughaibu: Dear Key P.

I dare say you're correct, I suspect my progeny won't.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
KGA Muzio Gambit Accepted From Def (C37) 1-0 Story by JHB
from A Players Announced to Fredthebear's Audience by fredthebear
King's Gambit: Accepted. Muzio Gambit Accepted From Defense (C3
from kenw by gambitfan
No point in waiting
from Esoterica by trh6upsz
King's Gambit: Accepted. Muzio Gambit Accepted From Defense
from GAMES OF THE DAY by gambitfan
from Joseph Henry Blackburne by capybara
Another fine example for kings gambit
from MAHENDRA JOSHI's favorite games by MAHENDRA JOSHI
24 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection X by PinkLedDoor
KGA Muzio Gambit Accepted From Def (C37) 1-0 Story by JHB
from Anderssen, Blackburne, Charousek by monet11
KGA. Muzio Gambit Accepted From Defense
from MKD's King's Gambit by MKD
shakespeare's favorite games
by shakespeare
KGA Muzio Gambit Accepted From Def (C37) 1-0 Story by JHB
from A Players Announced to Fredthebear's Audience by Patca63
King's Gambit Accepted: Muzio Gambit [Classic Masterpiece]
from Special Gambit Collection by mneuwirth
interesting note by Blackburne
from Games for Study by Tullius
KGA Muzio Gambit Accepted From Def (C37) 1-0 Story by JHB
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by fredthebear
"Face the Muzio"
from King's Gambit attacking games by Calar
KGA Muzio Gambit Accepted From Def (C37) 1-0 Story by JHB
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by Patca63
from Oginschile's favorite games by Oginschile

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC