chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs Adolf Anderssen
Vienna (1873), Vienna AUH, rd 7, Aug-11
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation. Normal Line (D55)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Steinitz/Anderssen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-02-04  pim: According to Imre Konig (in a book about chess evolution, 1951): "This game between the formeost representatives of the 'classical' and the 'modern' school is really the beginning of modern positional play." He says this mainly because of 11 dc5: which tries to create weaknesses in Black's position (instead of going for the k-side attack with Ne5 a la Pillsbury, for instance). I'm not quite sure about his verdict though, anyone with other early examples of 'modern (i.e. Steinitzian) positional play'?
May-06-10  ariel el luchador: El match con anderssen muestra un juego posicional de Steinitz en los gambitos de rey que jugó , y en la española que gano una mala partida de Anderssen,evidentemente no entiendió la partida.y Pilsbury era un jugador muy agresivo pero con alto sentido posicional el cual le faltaba en alguna médida a Anderssen.
May-06-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: The claim that this one game by itself represents "the beginning of modern positional play" is a little extravagant (I can think of some Morphy games that might qualify); despite this, the game does show how far advanced Steinitz was compared with the other great players of the period. Anderssen was probably baffled at how he could not summon forth one of his patented attacks; perhaps as baffled as some of Petrosian's opponents. 9.cxd5, 14.Rfd1!, 19.h4 and 25.Nd1 all stand out as great moves.
Nov-29-10  ariel el luchador: Tal vez haya un error anterior ¿pero que pasaba si en vez de jugar 12)....C5R las negras jugaban 12)....D3C ,12)....C5R creo que es la jugada que hace perder a Anderssen la partida.
Nov-29-10  ariel el luchador: Me parece que esta partida no merece estar entre los grandes triunfos de Steinitz, no solo porque ganó muy fácil sino porque la partida no es brillante.Steinitz aprovechó muy bien los errores del rival pero no es una gran partida.
Jan-31-12  Knight13: 12...Ne4? ...Nb6 is better. If Anderssen was really okay with an isolated pawn, he should've played 11...Nxc5.
Jan-31-12  RookFile: At a high level, this game is another illustration of my theory that so often, the black QB proves to be worthless to the player with the black pieces. It looks pretty for an offense against white's king - but what happens when the game flows so that white is the one doing the attacking? It means that that this bishop is just an innocent bystander.

As a practical matter, I believe that black should take advantage, whenever it isn't too bad, of any opportunity for black to trade this bishop for any minor piece of white's.

May-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: You'll find this game well presented by Thomas Engqvist : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgha...
Jan-25-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: Thank you for the video link <whiteshark>. After the classical music, it was instructive, to the point, a cunning mix of planning and tactics.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
This game represents "the beginning of modern positional play"
from Quickly Perhaps Prickly QG Poked Fredthebear by fredthebear
virgil's favorite games
by virgil
QGD: Modern Variation. Normal Line (D55) 1-0 Watch the video!
from 1851 Beyond London by fredthebear
Game 423
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by FRoeten
+0 -2 =0 vs. Steinitz (Vienna, 1873)
from Match Anderssen! by chessgain
See move dxc instead of Ne5. Which is better? why?
from Study for World Open by hibolife
Game 423
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by demirchess
why black needs to include h6
from Tartakower games by scallahan4
+0 -2 =0 vs. Steinitz (Vienna, 1873)
from Match Anderssen! by amadeus
Hanging Pawns
by Benzol
I played 11b3-2013
from Vs Jacob C by JohnM
Queen's Gambit Decline Modern Var. Normal Line (D55),1-0
from vaskolon's with sacrifices Mr. ANDERSSON by vaskolon
D55
from First of Each ECO CLONE by Penguincw
Who was this guy?? :-D
from Having fun with the QP by yiotta
Hanging Pawns
from 30 Moves Or Less (1857-2018) by Rio Mike
Game 33
from World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Wilhelm Steinitz's Best Games
by Nimzophile
D55
from First of Each ECO by Penguincw


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC