chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert James Fischer vs Ulf Andersson
"They'll Do It Every Time" (game of the day Apr-27-2008)
Exhibition Game (1970) (exhibition), Siegen FRG, Sep-26
Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Modern Variation (A01)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 65 times; par: 64 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2,377 more games of Ulf Andersson
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-28-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: No wonder black resigned-Fischer was up the exchange and a pawn!
May-05-08  ruelas007: <whiteshark> Oh rofl!
Aug-26-08  Slurpeeman: I found another manuscript of Fischer - Andersson on Mychess.com (tactics 1 = > #7). Which one is right?

http://www.mychess.com/tactics/tact...

Sep-23-08  Tripler: Fischer flicked out 1.b3 against three young players: Andersson, Tukmakov and Mecking. The Mecking game transposed to a Bird's. He won them all. Maybe he just felt like a day off from mainline theory; more likely he just wanted to get these young players out of the book so they had to think for themselves.
Jan-26-09  UnsoundHero: ,There are a couple of reasons why Fischer played 34 Be5 rather than the flashy 34 Rxf5 & Rg7 and then sacrificing the queen:

* There's always the possibility of a mis-calculation. Fischer would be down a queen for a piece if black had a miracle defense. It's true that this would be extremely rare in Fischer's case, but he reasoned, correctly, that he didn't have to take this chance.

*Fischer himself admitted that he liked to "see his opponents squirm". It's almost as if he wanted to win the game as slowly as possible. I wonder if Anderrson actually squirmed after 34 Be5. Here he was, down one exchange, being threatened with another.

Fischer knew that he would eventually win after 34 Be5 without risk.

Aug-05-09  birthtimes: 34. Rxf5 gxf5 35. Rg7 Rd1+ 36. Kg2 Nf4+ 37. Qxf4 Qd5+ 38. Kh3 Rd4 39. Bxd4 Qe6 40. f7 Qxf7 41. Rxf7+ Kg8 42. Qxf5 a4 43. Rf8#
Aug-05-09  birthtimes: 34. Rxf5 gxf5 35. Qb5 Rd8 36. Qxf5 Re8 holds out longer than 36...Nf8 (much more than 7 moves).
Aug-05-09  shalgo: <if i remember correctly, yusupov used the Rg1 g4 strategy as black>

Here is the game, analyzed (as you mention) in Dvoretsky and Yusupov's "Positional Play."

Taimanov vs Yusupov, 1982

May-26-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <There are a couple of reasons why Fischer played 34 Be5 rather than the flashy 34 Rxf5 & Rg7 and then sacrificing the queen:

* There's always the possibility of a mis-calculation. Fischer would be down a queen for a piece if black had a miracle defense. It's true that this would be extremely rare in Fischer's case, but he reasoned, correctly, that he didn't have to take this chance.

*Fischer himself admitted that he liked to "see his opponents squirm". It's almost as if he wanted to win the game as slowly as possible. I wonder if Anderrson actually squirmed after 34 Be5. Here he was, down one exchange, being threatened with another.

Fischer knew that he would eventually win after 34 Be5 without risk.>

Or he just missed the combination. Nah, couldn't be.

Jun-01-12  kasparvez: This is indeed a phenomenal game! Not the usual direct and crystalline Fischer. The quality and level of brilliance is up there, but the character of play is more subtle, garbed and not immediately evident. Great lesson.
Aug-25-12  csmath: One of the most brilliant games Bobby played.Once the battery was in place the game was won. It is just plain amazing that human comes with something engine never would. But one needs to say that Andersoon, just like Taimanov shuffled pieces aimlessly not knowing how to counter strange setup.
Sep-21-12  nummerzwei: I didn't know these two have played.
Apr-13-13  Wyatt Gwyon: Fischer was just cocky as hell at this point in time, wasn't he? lol.
Apr-13-13  RookFile: It was a wonderful plan involving play on the g file that a lot of grandmasters took note of.
May-07-14  Strelets: 37...gxh5? would've led to a thunderous finish: 38.Qg8+!! Qxg8 39.f7+ Qg7 40.Bxg7#
May-07-14  Strelets: And the same theme works after 38...gxh5?: 39.Qg8+!! Qxg8 40.f7+ Qg7 (40...Ng7 41.fxg8=Q+ Kxg8 42.Rxg7+ Kh8 43.R anywhere on the g-file other than g8# On 40...Nf6, White simply has 41.fxg8=Q#) 41.fxe8=Q Rxe8 42.Bxg7+ Kg8 43.Bxf8+ and White's up a rook and a piece.
May-07-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <1Tripler:
Maybe he just felt like a day off from mainline theory; more likely he just wanted to get these young players out of the book so they had to think for themselves.>

This game was basically a sicilian
a tempo ahead.

Mar-05-15  jerseybob: xrt999: Your remark is incredibly odd: who cares if Andersson was a GM at this exact moment in time? He was an up and coming young player who soon became a GM, just as Fischer himself had been early in his own career. Bobby obviously didn't feel demeaned by playing him; he fully understood the young man's potential.
Apr-14-15  cunctatorg: This game was a nightmare for Black; Fisher's white pieces seem to have an infinite number of resources...
Oct-01-16  Rookiepawn: <keypusher: <There are a couple of reasons why Fischer played 34 Be5 rather than the flashy 34 Rxf5 & Rg7 and then sacrificing the queen: * There's always the possibility of a mis-calculation. Fischer would be down a queen for a piece if black had a miracle defense. It's true that this would be extremely rare in Fischer's case, but he reasoned, correctly, that he didn't have to take this chance.

*Fischer himself admitted that he liked to "see his opponents squirm". It's almost as if he wanted to win the game as slowly as possible. I wonder if Anderrson actually squirmed after 34 Be5. Here he was, down one exchange, being threatened with another.

Fischer knew that he would eventually win after 34 Be5 without risk.>

Or he just missed the combination. Nah, couldn't be.>


click for larger view

OK, maybe he missed the combination, but to be fair, at this point Black's position is so terrible that there are many ways to win for White. Maybe the way Fischer wins is not so flashy, but it is still very attractive.

Being not a usual opening for Fischer, I think his logical, clear playing is still there. No dubious fuzzy variants, the attack on the K side seems very transparent and even announced... And still Black never finds counterplay.

Dec-24-16  izimbra: Some mention of Fischer vs. Mecking, on the main page, led me to look for games where Fischer played the Nimzo-Larsen as White. There were only a few, and Andersson was the highest level opponent I recognized. This game and the Mecking game are similar in the sense of fitting this description: Fischer has W around 1970 against an opponent he feels he can beat. He decides to go for a plan that will eventually give him a massive attack against the opponent K without any real risk of a loss. If Black played the best opening moves, N-L would probably increase chances of a draw, but it was less well known then and Fischer was playing it against opponents he didn't regard as offensive threats.

In that context, this exhibition game is kind of cool to see how Fischer puts on a caveman attack against a strong defensive player.

Nov-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: C.N. 11543: <From John Donaldson (Berkeley, CA, USA):

‘The recent publication of all 20 games from Bobby Fischer’s simultaneous exhibition in Münster, Germany in 1970 resolved several mysteries and gave the chess world over a dozen new games played by the late world champion.

The display was previously known, although not the exact date. The fact that it took place on 27 September 1970 makes it probable, if not 100% certain, that the exhibition game Fischer v Andersson, sponsored by the Swedish newspaper Expressen, occurred the day before. The Siegen Olympiad ended on 27 September, but the last day of play was 25 September. It is conceivable, if unlikely, that the Fischer v Andersson game was on 25 September, as neither played in the final round of the Olympiad.>

I wasn't aware the date of this game was uncertain. I note Spassky didn't play in the last round either, although he and Fischer were still in contention for the best score on top board: http://www.olimpbase.org/1970/1970i...

Nov-15-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Agreed with Donaldson that scheduling the game for the last day of the Olympiad seems improbable, but it only just occurred that there's a major clue in the form of <sponsored by the Swedish newspaper Expressen>. I suggest one of our lazyboy Swedish readers pulls their finger out and gets on the case. I'll expect a report back within 72 hours.
Nov-15-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: I've realised there's a major problem with Donaldson's line of argument. The 25th and 26th of September were Friday and Saturday, respectively. Fischer (not to mention Reshevsky) was still observing the Jewish Sabbath at this time - here's the American Olympiad schedule http://www.olimpbase.org/1970/1970u... which confirms Fischer didn't play on any Friday or Saturday. Note that Olimpbase incorrectly gives the date of the USA - USSR match (Spassky vs Fischer, 1970) as the 19th, but it took place on Sunday the 20th.
Nov-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Hmmmm, seems Donaldson was right and the game was played on the 26th, but he doesn't address the issue of playing a game for financial gain on the Sabbath. Sundown in Germany at that time of year wouldn't be till about 7pm, so it's hard to see the game starting that late.

C.N. 11562 also has some thoughts on Fischer's role in the development of the Hedgehog system, wherein he cites this simul game played the following day: Michels vs Fischer, 1970

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 83
from book: Kasparov's O.M.G.P. part 4 by Baby Hawk
nimzo larsen attack
from benjobench's fischer games by benjobench
Game of the Apr-27-08
from Games of the day 4 by Herkus
Nimzowitsch/Larsen Attack by Raymond Keene
by willyfly
A King in Exile
from How Good Is Your Chess? by Daniel King by SirIvanhoe
Game 7 in 'How Good is your Chess?' by Daniel John King.
from f6 II by fredthebear
Electric General
by Gottschalk
Nice Hedgehog
from ArmoredCav's favorite games by ArmoredCav
ch 3 Standard attacking plans
from book: Sacrifice and Initiative (Sokolov) by trh6upsz
maestro37's favorite games Nimzo-Larsen Attack
by maestro37
"They'll Do It Every Time" Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Modern (A01)
from Favorite Fischer games by Cinco
64idi0t's uncommon_&_flank
by 64idi0t
Exhibition
from Robert J. Fischer Collection [White] by MichaelMichael
Robert Fischer's Best Games
by Patca63
Game 87
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by AdrianP
Game 83
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by nakul1964
13.Kh1/14/16
from 77-31_MG pattern: The Nievergelt Manoeuvre by whiteshark
Game 83
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Game 83
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by AdrianP
Another original!
from Robert James Fischer by yiotta
plus 111 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC