chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Ulf Andersson vs Mikhail Tal
Malmö Candidates Reserve Playoff (1983), Malmö SWE, rd 6, Jan-09
Queen's Gambit Declined: Anti-Tartakower. Petrosian Variation (D55)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 102 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 30 more Ulf Andersson/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-25-04  GreenDayGuy: If 51. f5 Kg5
52. g3 Kf6
53. Kf4 Kf7
54. Kg5, etc.
Dec-25-04  PinkPanther: This is the Petrosian Variation, right?
Dec-25-04  maoam: <PinkPanther> Yes, after the 11.Bxc4 the position is the Petrosian variation of the neo-orthodox QGD.
Oct-18-05  Poisonpawns: This is gm 6 of a canidates reserve match betwwen the two i think Tal was ranked 3 in the world at this time.Thes game is funny because Tal is too anxious to draw 26..Qe4!? played with the idea of 27.Qxd7? Qf4+ 28.Kg1 Qc1+ etc with an easy draw...but The "magician" from riga runs into the stunning 27.Bxf7! losing a vital pawn and now the endgame is andersson`s specialty and he grinds Tal down in a neat endgame.
Oct-19-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: <Poisonpawns> I don't see the point of your !? after 26... Qe4, because there is nothing better for Tal. It is obvious that the magician foreseen 27. Bf7. What else could he play?

The only alternative I see would be 26... b5, but after 27. Qa5, Andersson has a won position anyway. For instance 27... Qe4 28. Qd8 Kh7 29. Qb8! Qd4 30. Bf7 Bc8 31. f4! .

Oct-20-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: The point of no return for Tal was 25... a5? Better for instance 26... Be6. If 27. Be6 fe6 28. Qc7 Qf8! .
Nov-09-08  AnalyzeThis: Excellent comments by Mateo.
Dec-02-10  Ulhumbrus: 5...h6?! disturbs the King side pawns without necessity.

6 Bxf6?! concedes the bishop pair, and although White has won repeatedly after doing so, that may be because Black has not found the best course yet.

Dec-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Ulhumbrus> Really? Is this some sort of level? The move 5....h6 was introduced long ago to create a bolt-hole for Black's king. As to 6.Bxf6, in these middlegames, master practice has shown that Black's knight is often more useful than the bishop.
Dec-04-10  Ulhumbrus: <perfidious> The best play may show eventually that ...h6 and Bxf6 are both inadvisable, but the best play for either side may be yet to be found.
Dec-04-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <ulhumbrus> What exactly is your point? On the assumption that your statement is correct, then we don't really know that 5....h6 or 6.Bxf6 deserve the ?! against them, either. As noted, both moves were found to be useful long ago by strong grandmasters. In particular, your dogmatic comment re 5....h6 sounds more like one of the great Tarrasch's pronouncements-the difference is that he was a top-class player and writer who helped blaze his share of trails in the early days.
Dec-05-10  aktajha: <Ulhumbrus> I've often encountered posts of yours with dogmatic comment as "disturbs the king side pawns without necessity". Indeed, we learn our chess-playing children some ground rules so they won't falter quickly.

However, after gaining some experience position analysis can't be cut down into such simple things (thank God) and many things have to be considered. In the current opening, both h6 and Bxf6 have proven to be (very) fruitful.

Stating things is ok, but being so authoritive on it, without reason is not; try to be a bit more flexible with your offerings and many players weaker than yourself may be helped. Now it's possible you're only holding them back by dogmas

Dec-05-10  Ulhumbrus: <perfidious: <ulhumbrus> What exactly is your point? On the assumption that your statement is correct, then we don't really know that 5....h6 or 6.Bxf6 deserve the ?! against them, either. As noted, both moves were found to be useful long ago by strong grandmasters. In particular, your dogmatic comment re 5....h6 sounds more like one of the great Tarrasch's pronouncements-the difference is that he was a top-class player and writer who helped blaze his share of trails in the early days.>

<aktajha: <Ulhumbrus> I've often encountered posts of yours with dogmatic comment as "disturbs the king side pawns without necessity". Indeed, we learn our chess-playing children some ground rules so they won't falter quickly. However, after gaining some experience position analysis can't be cut down into such simple things (thank God) and many things have to be considered. In the current opening, both h6 and Bxf6 have proven to be (very) fruitful.

Stating things is ok, but being so authoritive on it, without reason is not; try to be a bit more flexible with your offerings and many players weaker than yourself may be helped. Now it's possible you're only holding them back by dogmas>

I draw your attention to two things.

1. I have not given the moves ...h6 and Bxf6 question marks and stated them to be mistaken. I have instead given them a question mark followed by an exclamation mark and described them as dubious.

2. I have not said that the best play will show them in the end to be mistaken. I have said instead that the best play may show them in the end to be mistaken.

Dec-05-10  Marmot PFL: Can't make any sense of 25...a5. Why not the natural 25...Be6?

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 6 Jan 9
from Malmö Candidates Reserve Playoff 1983 by Tabanus
Best Chess Games of All Time
by Timothy Glenn Forney
Tal no se salvo del increible finalista Ulff
from A Players in Fredthebear's Older Audience by fredthebear
48a_ QUEEN endgames - all the single Ladies
by whiteshark
When Magic and Wizards lived
from Giants and the others by lolototo
Play on the e-file, 2
from Game collection: IQP by trh6upsz
Not even the magician from Riga can escape Ulf's endgame skills
from Best of Ulf Andersson by Timwestlund
Best Chess Games of All Time
by JoseTigranTalFischer
51a1_IQP on d4
by whiteshark
The following games transpose to the IQP tabiya
from French Defense, Monte Carlo Exchange Variation by imsighked2
Understanding Endgames
by Friedeggsof
IGM Ulf Andersson
by 64rutor
Instructive chess endgames I
by Jaredfchess
Play on the e-file, 2
from IQP (cloned) by peckinpah
Instructive chess endgames I
by wwall
Ulf Andersson vs Michail Tal.
from Just CHESS ! by arielbekarov
Play on the e-file, 2
from IQ Baburin by mneuwirth
Tal no se salvo del increible finalista Ulff
from A Players Fredthebear's Contemporary Collection by fredthebear
The incredible repetition of moves is interesting
from Games of Sacrifice by Zabooti

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC