chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Yuri S Balashov vs Mikhail S Tseitlin
URS-ch sf (1969), Barnaul URS, Jun-??
Uncommon King's Pawn Opening (B00)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Balashov/M S Tseitlin games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-25-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Sneaky> Shredder 9 likes: 16. Nxe4 Bxh6 17. Qxh6 Qd7 18. gxh3 !e6 19. Qh4 f5 20. Ng5 1.33 on inf. analysis.
Mar-25-06  mikejaqua: I saw the free bishop and thought to just take it with the queen. The knight can be centralized later and I think the threat remains just as strong. Like someone said, there appear to be a number of winning scenarios here.
Mar-25-06  ckr: Perhaps, at this point of the game (19...)


click for larger view

black's best defense was to devert the knight away from the kingside by 19...d5 20.Nxc5 Qc6 21.d4 e5


click for larger view

and continue 22.Rf2 b6 23.Nd3 e4 24.Nf4


click for larger view

not the best position, but certainly better than actual play.

Mar-25-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The original move is to avoid the reflex recapture at h3.The text starts a series of mate threat possibilities along the h file and with the knight.
Mar-25-06  sagahelten: A puzzle which results in nothing more that a clear advantage after a long series of moves (which allow a lot of different variantions) should be a sunday's puzzle. I thought it was too difficult.
Mar-25-06  elkholi: hi
i like chess very much and these puzzles
but a problem happened to me
i missed the previous puzzles of 2006
i do not have a credit card to have a premium membership CAN ANYONE HELP ME PLEASE????????????
i want someone send me them to my e mail
dr_amr_elkholi2010@yahoo.com
and thank u very much
ineed them very much pleaseeeeeeeeeeee
Mar-25-06  elkholi: help me please
Mar-25-06  dakgootje: A very nice puzzle imho where i only got the first move and the main ideas after that one, and which i only understood by seeing the solution and reading some of the better comments on this page.

Some other things to mention:
I think <Isamaru> gave the best explanation of the first moves why the first moves were played like this, so for the ones who dont understand it yet, read his comment (on of the first of the 1st page)

<sez: bad puzzle> some explanation why you think its a bad game would be nice, as it is tactically very nice, though less spectaculair some other puzzles and less obvious and harder to understand maybe.

<i dont think this is a puzzle for saturday, all chess players expect something far more difficult than that> No i think it was too hard to get most of the variations to place it earlier in the week.

<frankly, i don't like this puzzle because the solution is not that beautiful> No but saturday and sunday puzzles are, i think, chosen mainly because they are tactically brilliant instead of looking whether it is a beautiful solution. Those spectaculair solutions are often placed earlier in the week at mondays etc, where it is often 'obvious' to look at the place where to sac a queen/rook and thus considered hard for a monday if the solution isnt a queen/rook sac

Mar-25-06  Bishops r power: Listen JOE45 knight can eat the queen
Mar-25-06  dzechiel: Well, not only did I not see this line, I don't think I could find it now, having already seen it.

The myriad of variations are difficult to keep up with. One must be impressed with Balashov for coming up with this combination.

Mar-25-06  question marks: I hope I'm not being redundant:

Very good play by white in seeing that the bishop cannot be retreated after Nxe4, because 17.Bxg7 leads to a mating strategy for white - 17...Nxg7 18.Ng5! or 17...Kxg7 18. Qc3+ Kh8 Ng5!

But black left his bishop there, so the only advantage that white gained was a pawn and maybe tempo. There may have been lot more that could have happened in the final 8 moves, I wonder if white had an even better line?

My computer isn't great, but I have crafty running on move 16 for black, mysteriously suggesting Bd4+, although it rates it +2.33... what about Bf5? Rxf5 Qd7... I guess that isn't pleasant for black.

What was the purpose of 21...d5, or did black just not have another move?

Mar-25-06  question marks: update on my computer analysis: it got out to a depth of 12, and is suggesting 16. Qd7
Mar-25-06  durnstein: ckr: 16 ... f6 17 Qxh3 e5 (NOT Bxh6), and it seems the Black king can get away to the left. Also Black's queen then has space to get into the defense.

I don't like Black's position from earlier than 16, but it still just doesn't seem that 16 Nxe4 leads to a forced win for White or even a strong advantage.

Mar-25-06  goldenbear: I don't see that anyone has mentioned the real solution. I don't have a program but I bet White forces victory in all variations with 18.Ra4!, creating the threat of 19.Rf6!! I see no defense. Not 18.Rf6! because of 18.Qg4. That's the point of Ra4. Please correct me if I'm wrong on this.
Mar-25-06  goldenbear: thats 18 Rf6?? because of Qg4
Mar-25-06  goldenbear: <ckr> is right. Black has resources after white's mistaken 18.gxh3?
Mar-25-06  question marks: <goldenbear> what about 18. ...Bf5
Mar-25-06  durnstein: goldenbear: Your variation is strong, but only because of Black's horrible 16 ... Qd7. Only that mistake sets up the fork your attacking line depends on.
Mar-25-06  goldenbear: hmmm don't know. maybe doesnt work
Mar-25-06  goldenbear: <question marks> Bf5 g4! Bg6 Rf3 I guess.
Mar-25-06  goldenbear: <durnstein> I agree, 16. Bxg7! was correct, forcing this line due to the need to defend f5. That is, I think to save the tempo for Bf5 loses to RxB
Mar-25-06  khense: Final position: I thought black might try 24...Qd5+, 25 Kh1 F5, however after 26 c3 black's queen will not be able to defend h8.
Mar-25-06  ckr: <durnstein: 16 ... f6 17 Qxh3 e5 (NOT Bxh6)> e5 ? If you don't play 17...Bxh6 then White would not hesitate to take yours 18.Bxg7 - If you recapture with the knight you can't defend f6 after 19.Qh6 but you have to move something


click for larger view

any move Nxf6+

If you capture the bishop with king 18.Bxg7 Kxg7 19.Qg4+ and squeak to the other side with 19...Kf7 20.Ng5+


click for larger view

one more step to the queenside and you are mated so back to the corner (but 21...Kf7 or 21...Kf8 and 22.Ne6+ (discovered) and the knight grazes on Queen)

So 19...Kh8 would have been best

20.Qg4+ Kh8 21.qh5+ Kg8 22.Qg6+


click for larger view

and neither 22...Ng7 or 22...Kh8 look appealing.

Mar-25-06  McCool: It's kind of funny how the rook on a1 made its way to h6 without any interference.
Mar-25-06  ckr: And ... none of the lines would be as strong without 16.Ne4
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
16. Nxe4!
from Weakened Castled Position by patzer2
16.? (Saturday, March 25)
from POTD Uncommon by takchess
16.? (March 25, 2006)
from Saturday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
16.? (Saturday, March 25)
from Puzzle of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
16. Nxe4!
from Weakened Castled Position by trh6upsz
16. Nxe4!
from Weakened Castled Position by Jaredfchess

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC