chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Henry Edward Bird vs NN
Unknown (1869)
King's Gambit: Accepted. Rosentreter Gambit Bird Gambit (C37)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Bird/NN game
sac: 13.Qe8+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-27-12  stst: Yes, easy smothered play - Qsac:
13.Qe8+ either NxQ or RxQ (forced)
14.Nf7# K has no escape square.
Aug-27-12  stst: <Surely this puzzle should have started one move earlier, i.e. on move 12?> -- Agreed, but still it's too easy & natural to have this development.
Aug-27-12  stst: <May I differ? This is not easy. It is hard, even very hard. It is of course, simple (one move and the trap is sprung), but that is something quite different.

If you want to know how hard a puzzle is, you need to ask someone who did not get it. And in that respect I am your expert. I tried all kinds of desperate ways of killing off my queen, including Qe8, but never saw why it was the key. So can we reclassify this one as “very simple, but almost impossible to spot”?

Well, well... depends on how you view it - in this case, it's both simple and easy, and very natural, after Qe8+, the only response is to kill the Q with R or N, then Nf6+ is natural. Not easy indeed to understand why it's not easy.

On the other hand, something could be very simple, but never easy, like the open problem of Goldbach:

Every even number = sum of two primes.

(Prove or disprove, not easy at all either way.)

Simple enough, but has lured math world over two hundred something years!!!

Aug-27-12  PaulLovric: is it a smothered mate or Phillador's something?
Aug-27-12  Castleinthesky: While this is a good Monday puzzle. For once, I saw the solution as soon as I looked at the puzzle. Maybe getting old does have its advantages.
Aug-27-12  gars: Let's praise the Lord for Mondays!
Aug-27-12  shaikriyaz: I once read it here some kibitzer mentioning a kasparov quote <once your knight reaches the d3/d6 square, its only a matter of time before you win>
Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: I remember some quote about a Knight on the sixth means your game wins itself, but here's a counterpoint:

"A final point to make about overrated knights has to do with knight outposts on the sixth rank. Traditionally, knight outposts on the sixth rank have been considered towers of strength, and barring a quick exchange of the infiltrating steed, the defence was supposed to crumble in short order. To be fair, knights on the sixth, if well-secured, can be very powerful. But players and annotators today are aware that this is just a probabilistic advantage, not a hard-and-fast rule."

John Watson, "Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy"

Aug-27-12  bachbeet: Got it. Interesting because no matter which piece black captures the Q with, it's mate.
Aug-27-12  Moonwalker: Looking forward to the day I pattern-recognise a Thursday puzzle!
Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Abdel Irada>: <<BillTaylor10: NN it means no name, and his opponent is anonymous.> Actually, NN stands for the Latin phrase "nomen nescio": "I don't know the name" (literally, "(the) name not-I-know").>

Anyone who plays a game like black did, and haven't we all, prefers to be NN or anon.

Aug-27-12  EXIDE: I started with Nf7+, and discovered that I had to retrace my moves in order to win.
Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <EXIDE: I started with Nf7+, and discovered that I had to retrace my moves in order to win.>

Interesting point: 13 Nf7+ Ke8 14 Nd6++ still wins after 14 ... Kd8 or Kf8

Aug-27-12  Abdel Irada: <stst>: <Every even number = sum of two primes.>

Wouldn't a single counterexample suffice to destroy this hypothesis? Say 25 + 5 = 30? Here, in the first test case I thought of, we find the even number 30 consisting of the sum of a prime (5) and a composite (25).

Now, I'm not a mathematician, and I may have misunderstood the stipulations in some way. For example, you may have meant to specify that two primes can be found that add up to each even number; in this case, say 23 + 7. If so, please point out my error.

And incidentally, would 2 be a special case? Note that it consists of 1 + 1 or 2 + 0, and 0 and 1 are neither prime nor composite.

Aug-27-12  Abdel Irada: <tpstar: I remember some quote about a Knight on the sixth means your game wins itself....>

One question: If a knight on king six is like a bone in the throat, is a king on knight six like the throne in a boat?

Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <shaikriyaz>: <I once read it here some kibitzer mentioning a kasparov quote <once your knight reaches the d3/d6 square, its only a matter of time before you win>>

I imagine Kasparov was remembering his game 16 in Karpov-Kasparov II, when he was black and got a knight entrenched on d3, and proceeded to crush WC Karpov in astonishing style. Afterwards he said that such games remain with their creator for the rest of their lives. That was 1985. I did not look it up, so may have misremembered (not being the creator!) the exact reference.

Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Abdel Irada>:
<One question: If a knight on king six is like a bone in the throat, is a king on knight six like the throne in a boat?>

Without doubt, this is the wittiest post I ever read on CG.com. Kudos!

Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Bravo!!
Aug-27-12  sushijunkie: <Abdel Irada: <stst>: <Every even number = sum of two primes.> Wouldn't a single counterexample suffice to destroy this hypothesis? Say 25 + 5 = 30? Here, in the first test case I thought of, we find the even number 30 consisting of the sum of a prime (5) and a composite (25).

Now, I'm not a mathematician, and I may have misunderstood the stipulations in some way. For example, you may have meant to specify that two primes can be found that add up to each even number; in this case, say 23 + 7. If so, please point out my error.>

You are not wrong or misunderstanding, <stst> did a poor job of quoting the Goldbach Conjecture: Every integer greater than 2, CAN BE EXPRESSED by the sum of two primes. CAN BE is much different from IS. IS means IS ONLY, while CAN BE means IS, but NOT ONLY. Also, back when Golbach made the conjecture, 1 was considered prime, while it is now generally accepted to be something other. That now changes the conjecture to "Every integer greater than 4...".

Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <TheFocus: Bravo!!>

<"Oh frabjous day! Calloo! Callay!"

He chortled in his joy.>

Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Tiggler: <shaikriyaz>: <I once read it here some kibitzer mentioning a kasparov quote <once your knight reaches the d3/d6 square, its only a matter of time before you win>> I imagine Kasparov was remembering his game 16 in Karpov-Kasparov II, when he was black and got a knight entrenched on d3, and proceeded to crush WC Karpov in astonishing style. Afterwards he said that such games remain with their creator for the rest of their lives. That was 1985. I did not look it up, so may have misremembered (not being the creator!) the exact reference>

This is the game:

<Karpov vs Kasparov, 1985>

IMO, one of the greatest of all time (but nothing like today's puzzle).

Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Its a MOTHER, mate!
Aug-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <Abdel Irada: <BillTaylor10: NN it means no name, and his opponent is anonymous.> Actually, NN stands for the Latin phrase "nomen nescio": "I don't know the name" ***>

That is indeed the origin of the abbreviation, as I noted on page 2 of this thread, but in English it is commonly rendered as "No Name", as <BillTaylor10> said.

For more on "N.N.", see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomen_...

Aug-27-12  Shams: <For example, you may have meant to specify that two primes can be found that add up to each even number; in this case, say 23 + 7.>

Yes, that's the formulation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldba...

Feb-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Bird of Prey.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
mihai's favorite games
by mihai
Chess Traps
by Gottschalk
kga1-0 17drag kvävmatt
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
9...d6! forces a draw and 10...Nf6! leads to a favorable ending
from Defensive Combinations by xajik
KGA. Rosentreter Gambit Bird Gambit (C37) 1-0 Philidor's Legacy
from yMirages in Laredo, KS landed @Laramie, WY by fredthebear
KGA. Rosentreter Gambit Bird Gambit (C37) 1-0 13.?
from xOlde Kings ande theur Gamebits by fredthebear
w14
from Checkmate miniatures by Kasputin
woodenbishop's favorite games #2
by woodenbishop
14 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection II by wwall
14.Nf7# 1-0
from Checkmate: Smothered by Penguincw
rosentrentor gambit
from KGA-Knight Gambit -.Older Style continuations by takchess
Famous mate
from Яяoи caяa by CharlieLuciano
Challenger Bird
by Gottschalk
Kings Gambit accepted
by isrxjs
kga 1-0 14 drag!!!
from xfer's favorite games 2011 by xfer
11. Nxf7! sets up 12. Nd6+!
from Discovered Check by patzer2

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC