chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Arthur Bisguier vs Ljubomir Ljubojevic
11th Costa del Sol (1971), Malaga ESP, rd 14, Feb-??
Budapest Defense: Fajarowicz Variation (A51)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Bisguier/Ljubojevic game
sac: 9.Bc4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: Black could have played 16.Qxb4 an example of a following line might be 17.Bd2 Qe7 18.Ra1 (threatening Ba3 pinning the queen) Nd8 19.Ba3 c5 ( soon to be reinforced by b6) and now black has enough pressure to win whites f7 pawn, putting black up a pawn.
Apr-30-04  Benjamin Lau: IBM: for the fourth time, put a "..." to indicate black is moving. Second, 18. Ra1 does not threaten Ba3 because Bd2 has already been played, so Ba3 is now impossible.

After 16...Qxb4?!, I prefer 17. Bd2 Qe7 (17...Qb6 may be somewhat better) 18. Ng5 and white has a devastating attack with the two bishops and retains his pawn.

Apr-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: After 16...Qxb4? 17.Ng5 CRUNCH!
Apr-30-04  Benjamin Lau: <CRUNCH!>

Lol, feeling festive today Chessical? Your immediate 17. Ng5 is a bit better than my refutation since it does not give time for black to reorganize his pieces.

May-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: <After 16...Qxb4? 17.Ng5 CRUNCH!> Your correct. Whites position is too strong by the 16th move. I did find a stronger plan of action black could have taken earlier in the game however. Black wins two pawns. 6. ... Bf5 7. Nc3 Nxf2 8. Qxf5 g6 9. Qc2 Nxh1 10. g3 Nxg3 11. hxg3 dxe5
May-01-04  Benjamin Lau: Not quite. You missed e6!. Reshevsky vs Bisguier, 1955
May-01-04  Benjamin Lau: Black is slightly up in material, but white's strong minor piece attack proves in practice to make up for it as in that game.
May-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: <Benjamin Lau> 6. e5! is an improvement, however, two minor pieces against a rook should only be debated in a case where the position is relative. For example in the endgame different factors and positions, will affect which is more effective. In such an early stage of the middlegame, it is very hard to know. For my opinion on where black could have improved in the game you provided, see my notes ... Reshevsky vs Bisguier, 1955
May-01-04  Benjamin Lau: IBM: it is true that whether having two minor pieces or a rook is better is relative to the position; however in most cases, whether it be the middlegame or the endgame, the two minor pieces tend to be better, especially if one or both are bishops.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
CRUNCH!
from Gelly in the Center? by fredthebear
98_A51 Fajarowicz Gambit (3... Ne4)
by whiteshark
Budapest Defense: Fajarowicz Variation (A51) 1-0
from Black B Gambitz by Fredthebear by fredthebear
98_A51 Fajarowicz Gambit (3... Ne4)
by ChessMate123
Repertorio
by Gottschalk
The Milky Way - Game 113
from The Fabulous Budapest Gambit by Pyrandus
The Milky Way - Game 113
from The Fabulous Budapest Gambit by Buddy Revell

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC