chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Francis Joseph Lee vs Joseph Henry Blackburne
London (1899), London ENG, rd 5, Jun-05
Benoni Defense: General (A43)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Joseph Henry Blackburne.      [148 more games annotated by Blackburne]

explore this opening
find similar games 27 more F J Lee/Blackburne games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-07-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Interesting comment by Blackburne after the first move...

Does that really mean that 1. d4 c5 is bad?!

Apr-07-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: It was thought to be at the time. I wouldn't say it has a great reputation even today.
Feb-02-09  Edwin M: Some stats for 1. d4 c5 from ChessBase Big Database 2008; 19467 games played. 1-0: 7684 = 39% 1/2-1/2: 5166 = 27%
0-1: 6610 = 34%

Total White: 53%
Total Black: 47%

Doesn't seem like too bad of a rep too me... Also, you have to take in account that 1. d4 c5 often transposes into different openings such as Modern Benoni, Benko Gambit and Sicilian even!

Dec-10-10  Oceanlake: 10 Bd2 looks silly. If one must move h3, then one should consider putting the bishop on g3 or h2. On top of that, three futile queen bishop moves in the opening??
Dec-10-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <WannaBe> Much later than this game, in his 1934 match with Bogolyubov, when Alekhine responded to 1.d4 with 1....c5, he had some less than flattering comments regarding the move.
Dec-10-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <perfidious> I take it, you mean this game: Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1934

When you said <he had some less than flattering comments regarding the move> Do you mean Bogo, or A.A.? And, what was the comment?

Dec-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <WannaBe> It was Alekhine, in his annotations from the second volume of his best games.

While I haven't read the book in ten years or more, he spoke of a 'chess sin' or some such thing in playing 1....c5.

Mar-08-11  drakkenboy: Strange opening
Dec-04-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Another sparkling win with Black by Blackburne on the heels of his great victory in the prior round against Lasker (with his famous Rook sacrifice). The pleasure of playing over this game is enhanced by Blackburne's analysis, including the amazing Rook sacrifice he had in store for Lee had the latter played 23. g3).

The problem with the game is that Lee played like a deer in the headlights throughout after apparently being shocked by Blackburne's first move (1...c5). Lee's 2. e3 was obviously too timid (2. d5 was indicated) and it was all downhill from there for Lee. As both the Tournament Book and Oceanlake note, Lee's pointless Bishop wanderings were dreadful. After 10. Bg5 (instead of 10. dxe5), Lee was probably lost already (and as White!!). After 13. BxN (instead of 13. Be3), Lee seemed surely sunk. Blackburne, however, let him off the hook this time with 13...fxg5 (why not simply 13...bxc6?) and 14...g4 (instead of the much better 14...e4).

Even after being given this reprieve, Lee was timid beyond belief. As of move 17, he only had one piece beyond his own first rank, and that was his Bishop at e2.

After Lee's awful 23. Nb3 (23. Qe2 immediately was necessary) Blackburne finished the game off briskly and dramatically. When Lee played the suicidal 26. Rfc1, the only question was how Blackburne would choose to conclude the game. As the Tournament Book correctly notes, the method Blackburne used (27...Qg4 rather than 27...Nc4) may not have been the most artistic way to finish off the hapless Lee, but it was the fastest.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
tactics 2
by tactics
London 1899
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC