Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Reuben Fine vs Mikhail Botvinnik
"Fine Slew" (game of the day Jun-05-2009)
AVRO (1938), The Netherlands, rd 1, Nov-06
French Defense: Winawer. Advance Variation (C17)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 57 times; par: 52 [what's this?]

Annotations by Reuben Fine.

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Fine/Botvinnik games
sac: 13.Ra4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-23-12  Eduardo Bermudez: Is amazing when you realize (according to Fine) that Botvinnik are hopeless after twelve moves !!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Beautiful positional game. Black is indeed strategically lost after just 12 moves.
Feb-04-13  Eduardo Bermudez: Positional clearness !
Feb-04-13  JimNorCal: I was just pondering how weak White's pawns were looking when Fine suddenly explained he had a won game. Deep and impressive insight, indeed!

The pun is a Spooner-ism on "swine flu"?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: <parisattack> It's not deep engine analysis, but Shredder12 says that black is okay after 14.Bd2 [+0.34], but dislikes 14...f6 [+1.01].

Black is still in it after 17.Qe1 [+0.60] but after 17...a5 [+1.29] Fine plays all the top 1 or 2 engine moves all the way to the end.

May-07-13  parisattack: <Check It Out:> Thank you! Just me, I would have judged White just 'better' if having not seen Fine's notes. And we know Fine could resort to hyperbole at say nothing of having a fine ego. I wonder if Fine ever shrunk himself? :)

On the one hand it is difficult to believe Botvinnik is truly lost after 12 moves; on the other, probably the type of position an engine may not see the 'positionally' lost aspect? Either way, Fine played brilliantly here!

May-07-13  RookFile: It might be interesting to see the deep analysis.
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: I checked the position after 14.Bd2 with Houdini 3x64. If Black plays 14...f6 the computer says that that White has an advantage of a bit less than 1. However, and this is kind of interesting, if Black plays 14...a5 followed by the development of the Bishop at a6, it gives zero advantage to White after 96/70, about 9.5 billion plys. So it seems that Fine was wrong, and Black's position was OK. The culprit was 14...f6.
May-07-13  parisattack: <Maxi... So it seems that Fine was wrong, and Black's position was OK. The culprit was 14...f6.>

Thanks for digging so deep for us!

A variation of the 'beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact.' At least it sounded good; Chernev would have loved it!

May-07-13  Olavi: <maxi> It wouold be nice to see some lines; after the simple 14...a5 15.Bxc3 16.Qxd8+ 17.0-0 white has what any strong player would automatically assess as a big positional advantage.
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: No, <Olavi>. I am sure that if you take a careful look at the board you'll see that is certainly not the case. After 14...a5 15.BxB dxB 16.QxQ+ KxQ 17.0-0 Ke7 the position is equal. If 18.Rfa1 Rd8 19.Nd4 Rd5 and the position is more dangerous for White than for Black.
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: But you are right, I should give some lines. I will if I get the chance.
May-08-13  Olavi: Yes, it's easy to have a glance at the board, decide that there will be a black square blockade and not look any further. Of course 16.0-0 or even 16.Rd4 might be better, and in that line 18. Rd1 Rd8 19.Rd6. If I understand correctly Kasparov analyzes this on OMGP IV, I wonder what he says.
May-08-13  Olavi: I now see this exchange on the first page: <Botvinnik gave 14..a5! 15 Bxc3..dxc 16 Rd4..Qe7 17 Rd6..Bc6 18 Qd4..Rb8 19 Qxc3..Rb1+ 20 Rd1..Rxd1+ 21 Kxd1..0-0 as playable for Black.> <White could improve with 15.0-0 or 16.Qd6 in that line.>
Nov-23-13  Bob Loblaw: <Olavi: Yes, it's easy to have a glance at the board, decide that there will be a black square blockade and not look any further. Of course 16.0-0 or even 16.Rd4 might be better, and in that line 18. Rd1 Rd8 19.Rd6. If I understand correctly Kasparov analyzes this on OMGP IV, I wonder what he says.>

Kasparov does indeed analyze this game in OMGP IV. He relies on the analyses of Fine, Botvinnik, his engine, and the Soviet master Belavenets. Like the commentators above, Kasparov flags 14... f6 as the "decisive mistake". 'There was,' writes Kasparov, quoting Botvinnik, 'a tactical chance with {14... a5! 15. Bc3 (15. 00 Ba6) 15 ... dc3 16. Rd4 (or 16. Qa1 Ba6) 16.. Qe7 17. Rd6 Ba6 18. Qd4 Rb8 19. Qc3 Rb1 20. Rd1 Rd1 21. Kd1 00' Then he adds "after 16. ♕a1 ♗a6 17. ♖a5 Belavanets recommended 17 ... ♕c8, but 17... ♕d5! is simpler with sufficient counterplay against the white king, which is caught in the centre. "

Kasparov has high praise for Fine's play. He gives Fine's game against Flohr from round five, which also began as a Winawer/Nimzovich French, in its entirety, and has this to say about it:

"White exploited his lead in development with the energy of Morphy and in full accordance with the teachings of Steinitz: the player with the advantage is obliged to attack, otherwise the attack will disappear! 'In terms of over all strategic planning and tactical execution, I consider this to be the best game I have ever played,' Fine later wrote. Also among his best was undoubtedly the game with Botvinnik."

At the end of his analysis of the Fine-Botvinnik classic, Kasparov observes that, "The games with Botvinnik and Flohr fully characterise Fine's style. He defeated both opponents thanks to his deeper evaluation of the position, based on his vision of latent resources, and his technically impeccable conversion of the advantage gained. The same purity distinguishes his wins at the AVRO tournament over Euwe and Alekhine.

Kasparov also deeply analyses Fine's win over Alekhine. Again he praises Fine's superb play, calling the game an impressive rout, and observing that other than Alekhine's defeat at the hands of Botvinnik at the same tournament, it's hard to remember a game where the former was so outplayed during his reign as World Champion.

Dec-24-14  Eduardo Bermudez:
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Slew here as in "Fine Slew" does not refer to murder <as such> but as in a large number such as

<Savino has been charged with three murders as well as a whole slew of other crimes.>

although that could be rewritten as

<Savino slew three people as well as a whole slew of other crimes.>


<Savino slew three people he thought had swine flu as well as a whole slew of other crimes.>

or even

<Savino flew the scene after he slew five fine people he thought had swine flu and then he flew through a slew of other crimes.>

Good pun! Good game!

Mar-30-18  RookFile: This may be Fine's most profound game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Slew is past tense for Slow. For example, after paying the speeding Fine, he always made sure he slewed down
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <morfishine: Slew is past tense for Slow. For example, after paying the speeding Fine, he always made sure he slewed down>

But Winnik was not happy about that.

Especially when he went over the game in slew motion.

Must have been a terrible experience.

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <moronovich> Thats hilarious!
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <morfishine: <moronovich> Thats hilarious!>

Yeah,we must try to enjoy this life we have.

BTW you have IMHO one of the best avatars here on CG.Somehow it makes me want a cup of coffee ;)And signals cosyness too. So IŽll have a cup of coffe right now,go to town with a good friend and may you have a pleasant time at Grenke,if that is what you choose.

Dec-24-18  DonChalce: splendid game by Fine.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 11...Bd7 was clearly better than 11...Nc6 but 11...Nc6 was not a fatal mistake. 14...f6 was the main culprit of Botvinnik's defeat in this game. Anyway, Fine's play here was superb.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: As I was playing through the game, I'm glad I didn't stop and ask whether black couldn't try to develop the bishop by playing 17..a5, because the rest of the game shows what's wrong with that move.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Amsterdam AVRO 1938
from Favorite Games from (1917-1943) by wanabe2000
Fine beats Botvinniks French at AVRO
from American chess triumphs by kostich in time
Inmortal games
by Retarf
AVRO 1938
by Benzol
Game 37
from Passion for Chess (Fine) by neontheorist
Game 37
from Passion for Chess (Fine) by rookchat9
Fr 1-0 31 SI!
from xfer's favorite games 2009 by xfer
Fine with a beautiful win (resign) [e4]
from layson27's favorite games by layson27
Good Knight vs Bad Bishop
from Positional Chess Handbook I by vantheanh
+1 -0 =1 vs. Botvinnik (AVRO 1938 'minimatch')
from Match Fine! by amadeus
Chess strategy
by Jaredfchess
Andreiko's favorite games
by Andreiko
Game 5
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
It's Fine!
by Francio
Fines - Lessons From My Games
by rookchat9
AVRO 1938
by JoseTigranTalFischer
June 5: Fine Slew
from Game of the Day 2009 by Phony Benoni
Game 5
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by nakul1964
Chess Strategy for the Tournament Player
by dkappe1
Good Knight vs Bad Bishop
from Positional Chess Handbook I by howardb86
plus 75 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC