Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Efim Geller
Budapest (1952), Budapest HUN, rd 2, Mar-04
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Long Variation (E68)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 64 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Botvinnik/Geller games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-01-05  chess man: Kasparov includes this game in My Great Predecessors.
Jan-28-12  screwdriver: I went through the game. It seemed like the opening was poorly played by Botvinik, since he gave himself an isolated e pawn. His whole game was based around holding on to and defending his isolated e pawn. But then, I thought Botvinik abandoned holding on to the e pawn for a decent counter punch consisting of taking blacks light squared bishop and busting up blacks kingside pawns. Also, Botvinik was able to maintain material equality by gaining an extra pawn of Geller's. However, the bishop pair and better pawn structure didn't equalize against black's better development and threats left on the board. I agreed with black playing knight g7 to solidify his position and keep any notion of white attacking his king at bay. Also, it maintained active threats on the board after white moved his queen. Then a few moves later, I think Geller was wise to play queen g6 and keep the queens on the board since Botvinik had an open board and his bishop pair only being a pawn down. Of course, Ng5, threatening a queen/king fork, got Botvinik to capture the knight at the cost of his bishop pair. Then the queens came off with black still having doubled rooks on the e file. Although, once Botvinik played pawn to c5, I was a bit confused as to how black should continue. I saw that Bishop c4 check was coming and one couldn't just go gobbling up the pawn on a3. I also thought playing rook to e1 pinning the bishop, but trading a rook a pawn up doesn't work. Because white had black's extra pawn on b7 locked down with his pawn on c5. Geller eventually played knight e6, evacuating the g7 square for black's king. Also, allowing Botvinik to have the option to capture on b7 with check was intersting. If Botvinik did that, I'm assuming Geller steps to f6 with a nice hiding spot awaiting his king on g5. Also, Geller would maintain capturing on a3. That threat was always there. I think Botvinik did the right thing by playing the pawn to g5 to take that safe haven for the king away, but then came the knockout punch of rook b3, blocking the capture of b7 and really making a dangerous passed pawn. Geller made the pawn on b3 count. I think Botvinik played Rook d1 hoping to maybe get a check on black's king , pickup the b7 pawn, and have his rook positioned behing black's b3 pawn in a good defensive postion. But, Geller plays Rook e2, allowing black to play rook d7 check picking up the b7 pawn after Geller would move his king. But Geller would then just play pawn to b2, which is protected by his rook that he played to e2. And if Botvinik plays king to F1 attacking the rook on e2, Geller simply replys with rook to c2, far enough away from the white king and threatening to check on c1, the promote the pawn to a queen on b1. After Botvinik would take the queen with his rook and Geller recaptures, Geller would easily eat up the remaining pawns that Botvinik had and checkmate him. So, Botvinik rightfully resigned after Geller's Re2.
Apr-07-15  Xeroxx: Nice game.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
from Lipnitsky Modern Chess Theory by cgrob
Assorted good games II
by rbaglini
by Zhbugnoimt
The blockade of a flank
from The Application of Chess Theory by xajik
Game 94
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Budapest 1952
by suenteus po 147
Grandmaster Geller: The First Quarter Century
by Resignation Trap
Game 94
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by AdrianP
Game 94
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by isfsam
The blockade of a flank
from The Application of Chess Theory by nakul1964
Geller beats the world champions and pretenders
by ughaibu
Mil y Una Partidas 1950-1959
by K9Empress
Power Chess - Geller
by Anatoly21
Anit-hero KID
by Joe Stanley
Game #17
from King's Indian pioneers by keywiz84
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Geller, The Nemesis
by kenilworthian
Game 94
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by nakul1964
KID with g3
by tibone
KID: Fianchetto. Long Variation
from MKD's KID by MKD
plus 10 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC