chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mikhail Botvinnik vs David Bronstein
Training Match Tournament (1952), URS
Queen's Gambit Declined: General (D30)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 72 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 32 more Botvinnik/Bronstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-01-04  Benjamin Lau: Is there anything wrong with 8. g4 instead of Bd3?
Feb-01-04  Catfriend: I didn't get you this time... g4 is already played on the 7th move...
Feb-01-04  Benjamin Lau: g5 I meant, oops. That Bronstein himself plays the weakening g5 (black tends to have more problems than white when he/she plays this) right after Botvinnik gives him the chance suggests to me that such a move is positionally undesirable for black, yet I fail to see why Botvinnik did not play g5 earlier instead of Bd3. Perhaps he really didn't expect Bronstein to play g5 in anticipation.
Feb-01-04  Catfriend: such pawns as the white g5 in your variation tend to be over-extended and weak later, though here mybe h4 would support g5. Yet, the nice f5-square for ♘g8 may be a compensation for the pressure g5 causes. And Botvinnik wants Bronstein to play g5 as black, so it's a provocation!
Feb-01-04  Benjamin Lau: I agree with your post although I think that an early g5 tends more often than not to be okay, although maybe I'm thinking too much in King's Indian mode. ;-) Did Bronstein really have to play the provocative ...g5!? though. Hmm, I think maybe ...h6 could have sufficed, that's what people usually do in the Keres Attack Scheveningen for example.
Feb-01-04  Catfriend: g5 as in King's Indian ideas is good with a more closed center, so I wouldn't play it, at least. And yes, h6 seems to be O.K., without too much weakness on the K-side. And still as I said f5 and g6 are a weakness...

8.g5 ♘e7 9.h4 ♘g6 10.♗g3 ♗e7 looks O.K for black

Feb-01-04  ughaibu: I dont like black's 16th, shouldn't he castle long at that point?
Feb-01-04  Catfriend: Bronstein tarried too much with the castling, that's right
Feb-01-04  Benjamin Lau: Catfriend, g5 is actually much more common in open games than you would expect. White almost always plays it in the Keres when black doesn't play ...h6. There is a similar line in the Najdorf I think for this. Don't forget the Semi-Slav Shabalov-Shirov gambit either, white often plays g5 if black doesn't do anything. Other than that, I think you're perfectly right that g5 should be delayed, it should be played only after Bronstein plays the knight to f6 (that's actually how it is in the opening examples that I mentioned earlier- it's not how closed or open the game is that matters, it matters if the knight is on f6 yet, which I neglected!), so that Botvinnik can gain a tempo kicking it instead of having Bronstein reorganize appropriately with ...Ne7 after white's premature g5. The more I look at it, the more I don't like Bronstein's ...g5. I agree with ughaibu that Bronstein should also have castled earlier. Bronstein has a painful position after white's 22. e5.
Jan-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The heading to this game says 'Training'. Training for what?
Jan-18-05  sneaky pete: <offramp> If I'm not mistaken, there was a training/selection tournament for the Helsinki 1952 Olympiad. World Champion Botvinnik was finally left out of the Olympiad team because ... he wasn't good enough at the time, according to his fellow grandmasters. I remember reading somewhere that Botvinnik wasn't to pleased with this verdict. The Soviet team in Helsinki consisted of Keres, Smyslov, Bronstein, Geller, Boleslavsky and Kotov. Maybe the story is different, they wouldn't let him play on board one, so he refused to play at all.
Sep-29-13  Ulhumbrus: 7 g4? disturbs the king side without necessity and gives Black the advantage. However it may take theory - meaning masterly experience- a long time, perhaps decades, to find the right answer for Black.

Instead of 8...g5 8...Nb6 makes way for ...Bd6

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC