Mikhail Botvinnik vs Mikhail Tal (1961)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Mikhail Tal
Tal - Botvinnik World Championship Rematch (1961), Moscow URS, rd 15, Apr-21
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Normal Defense (E81) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Given 6 times; par: 99 [what's this?]

explore this opening	find similar games	43 more Botvinnik/Tal games
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE. [CLICK HERE]

Aug-18-06		talisman: ...9.C5 is this where tal goes wrong?

Dec-05-06		ToTheDeath: c5 gives Black a totally lifeless position with major structural weaknesses to look after. Very nice technique by Botvinnik.

Aug-02-08		nimh: Black's position after 9...c5 is fine. The main reason for the loss was subsequent imprecise play by Tal.

Apr-19-10		DrGridlock: Problem is not in the opening. In fact, it’s “Tal-style” where an opening innovation gets him into the tactical type of middle game he likes best. In “Transpo Tricks in Chess,” Andrew Soltis writes, “ECO considered 8 o-o-o and 8 Bh6 b5 to be equal – and among the few Byrne Variation lines that don’t favor White. A similar idea was used by Tal in the 1961 world championship when he was trailing badly. He wanted to play an …e5/…c6 line but was afraid of 5 … o-o 6 Be3 7 dxe5! dxe5 8 Qxd8! When Black has the worst of a likely draw. Tal refined the order with 6 … c6 feinting in the direction of … a6/…b5. But after Botfinnik replied 7 Bd3, he continued 7 … e5! and got the opening he wanted.” Looking for Black’s error, one might start with the position after White’s 25 Kg2. Rybka scores Black’s best continuations as 25 … b5 or 25 … Bc3. click for larger view 1. = (0.13): 25...b5 26.cxb5 axb5 27.Rd1 Bd4 28.Ne3 Nf6 29.f5 gxf5 30.gxf5 R6e7 31.Bh4 Rd7 32.Bd3 2. = (0.14): 25...Bc3 26.Rd1 Nd4 27.Re3 Bb2 28.Nd2 Nb8 29.Rde1 Nbc6 30.f5 R6e7 31.e5 dxe5 32.Ne4 3. = (0.19): 25...Bd4 26.Bh4 Kg7 27.Rd1 b5 28.cxb5 axb5 29.Bd3 Rb8 30.Nd2 Nf6 31.Nf3 h6 32.a3 4. = (0.22): 25...h6 26.Rd1 Nd4 27.Ree1 g5 28.f5 R6e7 29.Ne3 Nf6 30.Bg3 Rd8 31.Bd3 Ree8 32.Nd5 5. = (0.25): 25...Nd4 26.Rd2 b5 27.Rc1 bxc4 28.Rxc4 Nb6 29.Rc1 a5 30.Ng3 R6e7 31.Bd3 Re6 32.g5 Instead Black continues to shuffle his rooks on the e-file with R6e7. Rybka sees White’s best option at move 26 as Ne3: 1. ² (0.34): 26.Ne3 Nd4 27.Nd5 Nxe2 28.Nxe7+ Rxe7 29.Rxe2 Nf8 30.f5 Nd7 31.Rd2 Be5 32.Rd1 Kg7 but it seems that Botvinnik wants out of sharp lines almost as much as Tal wants into them, and continues instead Nh2. By move 43, Botvinnik’s positional advantage with White had increased to the stage where Black really has nothing better than the exchange sacrifice in order to try for some counter-play. click for larger view 1. ± (1.15): 43...Nb4 44.Rd2 Nc6 45.Rfd1 Nd4+ 46.Bxd4 cxd4 47.Bxh5 gxh5 48.Rxd4 Rb2 49.e5 Rxa2 50.Rg1 2. ± (1.22): 43...Rb4 44.Bxb4 Nxb4 45.Rd2 Nxf6 46.Rfd1 There’s really not a much wrong with Tal’s play in this game. It’s just really hard to: (i) Play the Black pieces (ii) Against Botvinnik (iii) When you’re down 7 wins to 3 (with 4 draws) after 14 games.

Apr-22-11		offramp: This game was played 50 years ago yesterday (on 21st April 1961). A puzzling move by Tal at move 33: click for larger view He played 33...Ng7, but 33...Ned4 34.Rd2 Re6 35.Bg5 b5 seems to give more counterplay. A few moves later I think Botvinnik missed a very good move. click for larger view Instead of 40.f6, 40.Rdf2 looks a killer! But it was move 40 so playing a safe move was probably the best option.

Dec-16-11		Garech: Great game from Botvinnik - his play in the whole match was perfecly suited to demoralise the excitement-addicted Tal. His choice of slow openings and favourable endgames etc was a great conception - I was reminded of how Kramnik beat Kasparov. I.e. choose the correct openings to psychologically weaken your opponent. I wonder what Gelfand and Vishy are cooking up at this very moment... -Garech

May-14-20		joddon: a modern day fight...u have to get the rook into deep into your enemies territory...something every player is afraid to do against Magnus Carlsen.....he intimidates his opponents so far that they forget this main concept....if the game is a draw its a draw.....but if you cant attack with your rook....YOU WONT WIN!!….Tal is fearless, but BOTvinnik eliminates him.

Apr-22-21		tbontb: A professional display by Botvinnik. The crucial error seems to be 37....Ke7 (Ng7 was necessary with a grim defensive task). Though not the most incisive continuation, Botvinnik's 40.f6 ensures transition to an ending which is clearly won for him. Tal's 43....Rb4 is flashy but ultimately even worse than the alternative 43....Nb4 44.Rd2 Nc6 45.Rfd1 Nd4+ 46.Bxd4 cxd4 47.Bxh5 gxh5 48.Rxd4, also hopeless.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.