chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
John Littlewood vs Mikhail Botvinnik
"The Dragondorf" (game of the day Nov-24-2021)
Hastings (1961/62), Hastings ENG, rd 2, Dec-28
Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation. Yugoslav Attack Early deviations (B75)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 49 times; par: 31 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1,199 more games of Botvinnik
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-23-02  ughaibu: Drukenknight: a good reason not to play cxb2. The main reason that I prefer Kf7 is that white doesn't get to capture the e5 pawn so the knight stays under attack and black gets the initiative. Unless the knight goes to c2 (where it isn't dangerous) black can still play c2 followed by Qc8-f5 and Rd8. Black is a piece up and now fully developed, I dont see why there should be any difficulty winning.
Nov-23-02  drukenknight: okay ugh. you're going with another move I take it, 22...Kf7 then? I have to reset this one, I'm more into that Karpov/Miles game right now.
Apr-24-04  weary willy: (this should be john e littlewood - not his son paul - born ca 1956)
Sep-14-04  RisingChamp: This was a nice game.While it was going on many ppl had crowded around the board thinking it would be a famous victory for Littlewood.He had just overlooked the c2+ tactic after Nf5.Against the World Champion he should have been a lot more careful.
Sep-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: i watched this game being played when i was 13. it was incredibly exciting and all the spectators-having overlooked botvinniks c2+ resource-were convinced littlewood was going to win
Jan-02-09  Ychromosome: The position at move 21 makes me nervous just playing over it!
Sep-17-09  keithbc: C2+ resource??
Sep-23-09  SimonWebbsTiger: Rest in Peace John Littlewood
Sep-23-09  erimiro1: What about 20.N-f5 with a mate threat on g7?
Sep-23-09  erimiro1: Ah - missed 20.-c2+ 21.K:c2 Qc8+ and the poor horse is lost
Sep-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: as i said-i watched this game being played and everyone in the audience overlooked the c2 + resource as well
Sep-30-09  jerseybob: This system played by Botvinnik, a combo Dragon-Najdorf, is fascinating. I have a dim recollection of a game Browne played against Stewart Reuben in some late 60s British tourney, and he at some point moved a minor piece to d5. I think. And there's the game Fischer-Reuben in this database in which Fischer dispenses with all the Yugoslav niceties like f3 and Qd2 and just kills black down the h-file.
Nov-22-11  King Death: < erimiro1: Ah - missed 20.-c2+ 21.K:c2 Qc8+ and the poor horse is lost>

This was the point White overlooked when he went into this, as Botvinnik mentioned in his annotations. It's very easy for even an outstanding attacker like Littlewood was to miss this kind of resource at the start of one's analysis.

Jul-13-14  samsloan: I cannot understand why Littlewood played 13. cb3 instead of the standard ab3.
Jul-13-14  parisattack: The Dragondorf seems to be regaining popularity. I believe Carlsen essayed it a few times three or four years ago?
Jul-14-14  zanzibar: <samsloan> Boy, I must be out of the loop - how is 13.axb3 more standard than 13.cxb3?

I played out the Tree Window (using SCID) from the Dragondorf 7...a6, where 305 games had it (3.9%). (I'm using <MillBase> with 1.6M games.)

By the time I got to move 13, there were only 2 games in the database which matched, and both played 13.cxb3.

Looking with Stockfish 4 DD 64, out to 22-ply, gives a slight preference to playing 13.Nxb3 (+0.16/22), vs 13.cxb3 (+0.00/22) or 13.axb3 (-0.24/22).

My naive impression is that the open a-file isn't going anywhere, and you'd need a tempo, or even two, to get the king out of the way safely.

Why not fight it out of the c-file? (And not play 17.h4?)

Jul-14-14  zanzibar: Botvinnik had nerves of steel playing this, and the c2+ fork setting up the fork is quite beautiful.

Ironically, Black would have been better off allowing it versus what was played.

Best would have been 20.Nc2, which shows Botvinnik's steel nerves, since he had to calculate the king safe after, let's say:


click for larger view

20.Nc2 Qc7 21.gxh7+ Kh8 22.Ne3 c2+ 23.Nxc2 Rad8 24.Rxd8 Rxd8 25.Ne3 Rc8 26.a3 Bd5 27.Ka1 Be6


click for larger view

Aug-30-14  RookFile: As others have said, Botvinnik showed nerves of steel in this game. It requires supreme confidence in your defensive abilities to play this way.
Dec-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Remember when this game appeared in a collection by the US GM Larry Evans. 7...a6 is definitely too slow (7...0-0 with the usual mayhem is standard), and Littlewood could have pulled off a major upset. 13.cxb3 is a thematic move in the Dragon, but here it allows 20.Nf5?,c2+!; 21.Kxc2,Qc8+ winning the Nf4. With 13.axb3, Black probably would have tried a different defense, perhaps 13...h5!? or ...b4!? In any case, rather decent defensive brilliancy by Botvinnik.
Nov-24-21  newzild: <samsloan> and <zanzibar> The main idea behind 13. cxb3 is to prevent Black's pawn roller from crashing through on the K-side. This can be achieved by moving the Nc3 and playing a3. Then if Black ever plays a4, White simply plays b4. And if Black ever plays b4, White plays a4. However, Littlewood abandoned this strategic idea when he went for 14. Bh6, giving Black time to play b4 before he was ready to respond with a4.
Nov-24-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: I think K-side and Q-side are leftover terms from descriptive notation, and we should replace them with a-side and h-side or similar.

It's too easy to slip the pen with "K-side" just cos that's the side the king is currently on.

Nov-24-21  Atking: Facing the dragon sure of his power, little wood e5 is shaking... Why do I have to go to this square when the simple 16.Nce2 was possible...?
Nov-24-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <I think K-side and Q-side are leftover terms from descriptive notation, and we should replace them with a-side and h-side or similar. >

I hear that on the chess24 broadcasts with Howell and Houska, they only refer to right and left sides, lest the King and Queen sides confuse the casual viewer.

Nov-24-21  Brenin: <MissScarlett>: White's right is Black's left, and vice versa, so I don't see how this is less confusing. Call them east side and west side?
Nov-24-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: White's east is Black's west, and vice versa, so I don't see how this is less confusing. Call them King and Queen side.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC