Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Karl Robatsch
"Knight Fever" (game of the day May-22-2012)
Amsterdam IBM (1966), Amsterdam NED, rd 8, Jul-13
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange. Positional Variation (D35)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 30 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Botvinnik/Robatsch games
sac: 25.Rxg7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-13-09  notyetagm: 24 ... ♕d6-d5?

click for larger view

25 ♖f7xg7! <remove the guard: f6>

click for larger view

25 ... ♘e6x♖g7?? 26 ♘e4-f6+ <knight fork>

click for larger view

Apr-13-09  notyetagm: Game Collection: Centralized knights kill

24 ♘c3xe4

click for larger view

Oct-27-09  gurugulab123: rook on seventh rank serves two purposes....positions the queen out of defence and simultaeneously attacks along with the knights and queen...brilliant combo!!
May-22-12  sevenseaman: 'Knight Fever'! Resignation indeed is in order! The K hobbles to its doom in a few moves;

26. Qg3+ Kf8 27. Qf3+ Kg7 28. Qf7+ Kh8 29. Qxe8+ Kg7 30. Qf7+ Kh6 31. Ng4#

May-22-12  DanielBryant: Sometimes a move only catches your attention because it's needed as a desperado. That doesn't make it any less cool.
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Is the obvious win of as ♙, 15. Nxe5, bad for white? After 15...Bf5 16. f3, with 17. Qb3 to follow, what does black have?
May-22-12  sofouuk: <al wazir>the point is that black is 'threatening' Ba6 winning the exchange, hence Qa4 to keep the bishop off the diagonal. but white could have played 15 Qxe4!? Qxe4 16 Ncxe4! (not the other one) Ba6 17 Nd6! Red8 18 N6c4 (rybka) winning a pawn

click for larger view

not winning yet but black's compensation is dubious

May-22-12  Paraconti: Timely title for 'Game Of The Day'. RIP Robin!
May-22-12  Casseb: "<AdrianP>: 26 ... Kh8 27. Nf7++ 26 ... Kg8 27. Nf6+ (picking up the Q)
26 ... Kf8 27. Rf1+ Ke7 28. Qh4+ (and mate's coming up) 26 ... Kh6 27. Nf7+ Kh5 28. Nf6++"


Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: donna summer and Robin Gibb-is there a third to come?

Maybe he/she will die of a "night fever".

May-22-12  JohnBoy: <sofouuk: ... white could have played 15 Qxe4!?> Why does black play 15...Qxe4 here? Why not 15...Ba6 directly?
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: "Hey Misha! You gonna dance, tonight?"
May-22-12  parisattack: As every Russian schoolboy knows - Mikhail Botvinnik played some of his finest games after he lost the title to Petrosian.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <Paris Attack> absolutely correct including wins v smyslov, petrosian himself, keres, spassky, portisch, larsen, taimanov, stein, polugaievsky, matulovic, benko, matanovic, lombardy..and a missed win v geller after a magnificent strategic masterpiece.
May-22-12  parisattack: <Ray Keene> I am not familiar with the Geller loss (cite, please?) but I do remember the heartbreaking loss to Petrosian with the English in 1964; blundered on last move of a won ending.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <parisattack> This might be the game in question. Botvinnik vs Geller, 1966

IMHO Botvinnik certainly had the better of it.

May-23-12  parisattack: <Benzol> Wow, thanks. Don't think I've seen it before (or don't recall - also a possibility at my age :)).
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: botvinnik defeated petrosian in a staggering strategic masterpiece in 1964-it was in 1966 that he threw away the win and then lost by a tactical blunder. both great fighting games-interestingly both these botvinnik games v petrosian were English type flank openings-if botvinnik had used those as white in the 1963 match v petrosian, instead of beating his head against a brick wall with the wueens gambit, botvinnik might have retained his title.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: sorry typo in last post -queens gambit not wueens gambit !!
May-23-12  parisattack: Yes, you are correct - the loss was a 1966 Team game. There is a YouTube of someone who was there discussing the game tho I cannot latch onto it at the moment.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: i think the utube report was taken down
May-25-12  sofouuk: <JohnBoy: <sofouuk: ... white could have played 15 Qxe4!?> Why does black play 15...Qxe4 here? Why not 15...Ba6 directly?>15 Qxe4!? Ba6!? 16 Qxc6 Rac8 17 Qa4 Bxf1 18 Rxf1

click for larger view

two central pawns for the exchange, and difficult to open files for the rooks. rybka has it at about +0.5, again a bit better than what white played in the game

Aug-17-12  LoveThatJoker: Guess-the-Move Final Score:

Botvinnik vs Robatsch, 1966.
Your score: 43 (par = 33)


Premium Chessgames Member
  yiotta: It's odd that Botvinnik is almost never mentioned on player's lists of favorites.
Aug-10-14  Retireborn: <yiotta> Depends which players; both Botvinnik and Smyslov had a strong influence on the generation of players born in the 50s eg Jan Timman (and Ray Keene, as his comments on this game show.)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
98_D30,D31,D35-D37_QGD, EXCHANGE-Variation cxd5
by whiteshark
The Exchange Variation
from Play the Queen's Gambit (Marovic) by Chessdreamr by fredthebear
... Ne4, e7 exch, Bb7! Marovic wrong, center/ks attack/ bad D
from QGD Ex by yesthatwasasac
QGD. Exchange. Positional Var (D35) 1-0 Octopus & R on 7th!
from 1960s- The Rise of Fredthebear & Fischer King by fredthebear
Knight fever
from Nova's favorite games 3 by Nova
working on
by wwm
25 Rf7xg7+! White e4-knight has targets g8-king, undef d5-queen
from Type II knight fork by notyetagm
A Sakkozó a mérlegen című könyv játszmái
by EtienneS
from Memorizedgame by parmetd
Mikhail Botvinnik's Best Games
by dcruggeroli
The Exchange Variation
from Play the Queen's Gambit (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange. Positional Variation
from marwanredman123's favorite games 6 by marwanredman123
25 Rf7xg7+! Ne6xRg7?? g7-knight cannot defend f6 like g7-pawn
Koblenz's favorite games
by Koblenz

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC