Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Bronstein vs Olaf Ulvestad
URS-USA (1946), Moscow URS, rd 2, Sep-14
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Wormald Attack (C77)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Bronstein/O Ulvestad game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-01-07  sneaky pete: In someone else's shoes

I was 22 then and the youngest in the team. When, on the eve of the match, the strategical plan was being decided upon, the first to speak was the elder, M. M. Botvinnik.

Looking steadily at me, he pronounced in a clear and imposing tone: 'I hope that everyone understands the crucial nature of the match and that no one will play the reckless King's Gambit.'

That the ex-world champion was right in his assessment of the moves 1.e4 e5 2.f4 .. I did not realize straight away, but much later, when he convincingly refuted my opening construction in our personal encounter. But at that time, in 1946, I loved the King's Gambit with all my heart and never lost with this opening.

But the word of an older man is law. And I chose the solid Ruy Lopez. Already in the opening my game was not coming on well; then I missed my opponent's strong manoeuvre Qd7-c6-c4! and lost, one might say, rather wretchedly.

No, it is no mere coincidence that people say you should choose your opening according to your nature.

Bronstein, <200 Open games>.

Aug-14-07  wolfmaster: Interesting,<sneaky pete>.
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Bronstein's suggestion for an improvement was 12 exd; Suetin-Kholmov USSR Ch 1954 continued 12..Na5 13 Bc2..Re8 14 Nc3..Bb4 15 Qd3..Bh5 with a slight advantage for Black. It would have been logical for Bronstein to play 18 f4 (or maybe 19 f4); after 19..Qc6! Black was better. The alternative 20 Qd2 (20 Bd2..Nxd4)..Bg5 21 f4..Nxf4 loses material. 20..Qc4! threatened 21..Nf4 22 Nxf4..Qxe2 23 Nxe2..Bxc2 winning the a-pawm; after the forced 21 a5 White had no counterplay. 32 Qe2 would have held out longer.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
in someone elses shoes
from 200 Open Games by David Bronstein (part 2) by takchess
in someone elses shoes
from 200 Open Games by David Bronstein (part 2) by tak gambit
Match Bronstein!
by amadeus
in someone elses shoes
from 200 Open Games by David Bronstein (part 2) by mneuwirth
from Chess in the USA 1945-72, Part 1 (Leach) by Chessdreamer
in someone elses shoes
from 200 Open Games by David Bronstein (part 2) by nakul1964
Beating Bronstein
by Gottschalk

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC