Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs David Bronstein
"The SMERSH Gambit" (game of the day Jan-30-2017)
USSR Championship (1960), Leningrad URS, rd 16, Feb-20
King's Gambit: Accepted. Modern Defense (C36)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 129 times; par: 32 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 22 more Spassky/Bronstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-30-17  morfishine: Spassky also upended Fischer in 1960 with the King's Gambit

the 3...d6 "Bust" would not be resurrected til the following year by Fischer



Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: One of the better examples of chess being used in the movies, aside from a complete, good movie, like "Searching for Bobby Fischer."

SMERSH was a real life acronym for a soviet intelligence group. SPECTRE is a takeoff on that, used by the Bond people for their 60s films. The two large groups were the GRU, Soviet military intelligence (international) and of course the KGB, in charge of domestic surveillance. I think the GRU still exists in that name. the KGB was downsized after the fall of communist leadership there and renamed FSS (Federal Security Service).

Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: Also known as the FSB, after its Russian acronym (ФСБ for Федеральная служба безопасности), the way the KGB was known as the KGB rather than as the CSS.
Feb-01-17  Olavi: The Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion (SPECTRE) is an international organisation, often trying to provoke a conflict berween tha superpowers, so perheps Shmert Shpionam (SHMERSH) wasn't the model? At least they took some liberties.
Apr-15-17  Albion 1959: Amazing to think that Bronstein was unable to defeat Spassky once in 22 games! The Spassky Immortal Game? Possibly, though the use of computers and powerful search engines will have taken some of the gloss of this game. A key feature of a Spassky attack is the white squared bishop usually on b3 or somewhere on the b1-h7 diagonal, pressing down on the f7 square:
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: It does seem amazing that Bronstein only managed to defeat Spassky once and that was in a blitz game.

Bronstein vs Spassky, 1961


May-02-17  Ironmanth: Fantastic swashbuckling chess! Thanks for this one, chessgames.
May-11-17  User not found: I can't be the only one who thinks this move...Nd6!

click for larger view

Is unworthy of this comment..

<One of the deepest sacrifices this side of The Evergreen Game -- Soltis>

If you think about it it's an obvious looking move and one of the 1st you'd consider. Any decent player who plays tactically would see it and go for it. At worst you end up with these positions, blacks king is exposed but checking with the engine both these positions are dead equal..

click for larger view

click for larger view

Aug-23-17  Petrosianic: <checking with the engine both these positions are dead equal..>

You cannot rely on engines in this kind of position, whereas you seem to have trusted them blindly. So blindly as to have not evengiven or explained any variations at all. So I'll do your work for you here.

First of all, Black is in very deep trouble early in this game. Look at the position after 13. Bc2, where all of White's pieces seem to be focused on the Black King, and none of Black's pieces seem to be defending it.

Usually in this kind of opening, Black uses the extra f pawn as a buffer for his own King, but Black took it out of position with 11...fxe3. This makes the position much more tactical and acute. It doesn't matter what the eval says. Black is skating on eggshells and can go wrong very easily.

The whole point of Nd6 is to expose the (obvious) Qh7+ attack, and also attack the always-weak f7 (less obvious). It's a good move, just not as deep or subtle as Soltis suggests. The question is does it win by force, or does Black go wrong later?

It looks like Black goes wrong later (he's skating on eggshells, remember?). Nf8 guards against the obvious Qh7+ threat, but how serious is that really? As a rule of thumb, Q-R7ch is almost always good. But not always. In this case Bronstein didn't look deeply enough to see if he could survive the hit.

What about 15...exf1+ 16. Rxf1. Get that out of the way first.

Then 16...Bxd6 to stop Nxf7 and open up an escape square.

17. Qh7+ Kf8 18. Qh8+ Ke7, and the King squirts out. That's the kind of thing that always happens when I try this kind of attack.

Then what? 19. Re1+ Be5 and Black seems okay. Or 19. cxd6+ Kxd6, and it looks like Black is doing The King Walk, but White doesn't have enough material left to follow it up, and his Queen is completely out of position. Black seems to be at least surviving, if not winning.

Aug-26-17  tea4twonty: 15. Qxe2 Nf8 16. Rad1 Bg4 (16..Be6 17. Ne5 f6 18. d5) 17. Bb3 Ne6 18. h3 Bxf3 19. Qxf3 with a strong attack
Oct-28-17  edubueno: La mejor partida de BS en muchos años.
Feb-27-18  tgyuid: bravo; is he russian
Feb-27-18  tgyuid: hi; just what exactly do you think you are doing
Sep-22-18  The Kings Domain: Impressive win by Spassky, at his prime he was arguably the best player in the world. Games like this show why Fischer couldn't beat him prior to the '72 match.
Jun-16-19  Ratt Boy: <Petrosianic: "…Black is skating on eggshells…">

That sounds unproductive. Eggshells would have a lot of friction; I don't think anyone would get far that way.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: I guess this has been covered before, but in the movie they exclude some of the centralised pawns because they thought chess games had copyright - and that it didn't matter. It actually does.

The position in the movie after 21.Bb3

click for larger view

The computer gives 1) =0.00 (23 ply) 21...Qc5+ 22.Kh1 Rxe5 23.Nxe5+ Kh8 24.Nf7+ Kh7 [...]
While in the actual game black is lost.

Since I'm at my most pedantic, I should ad that Kronsteen works for SPECTRE so actually SMERSH has nothing to do with this game.

I watched it yesterday with my wife and in-laws, gleefully pointing out all the little inaccuracies. I'm so much fun to be around...

Nov-25-19  WorstPlayerEver: <User not found>

Soltis' comment is confusing indeed. I'm quite sure that they meant Nxf7.

Nov-25-19  spingo: <WorstPlayerEver: <User not found> Soltis' comment is confusing indeed. I'm quite sure that they meant Nxf7.>

Although Soltis's name ends in an <s> he is in fact a single individual human male.

You should have written <I'm quite sure that <he> meant Nxf7.>

Nov-25-19  WorstPlayerEver: <spingo> Thanks for the explanation!

But still I do prefer Soltis' name above Soltis's name. Seems confusing.

Nov-25-19  WorstPlayerEver: PS I find the Cambridge article confusing also.

<When the possessor is a regular singular noun> edit: that does not end in "s" (consequence).

<When the possessor is a singular noun that ends in "s">

<When the possessor is a plural noun that does not end in "s">

But they won't mention: <When the possessor is a plural noun that ends in "s">

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: If one is looking for consistency of English orthography, best of luck.
Nov-25-19  WorstPlayerEver: <perfidious>

Well, at least they try. This year Dutch language has about 100+ new students at all Dutch universities!

Nov-25-19  spingo: <WorstPlayerEver> I am glad you realized I was only joking. What you wrote originally was perfectly sensible.

BTW, I am a fan of the conductor <Sir Georg Solti>. His family definitely were the Soltis.

If Solti and the Soltis visited Soltis and the Soltises at summer solstice, that would be soul-destroying.

Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Diademas> I watched it yesterday with my wife and in-laws, gleefully pointing out all the little inaccuracies. I'm so much fun to be around...>

LOL! I'm exactly the same way. Like pointing out why the wings on Tom Cruse's F-14 in "Top Gun" were in the wrong place as he's trying to dogfight an A4 and how the song "You are the wind beneath my wings" is inaccurate because it is the wind <above> the wings that creates lift and allows the plane to fly.

I read some time ago that the technical advisor of "Top Gun" was asked how he could have allowed so many technical errors in the movie. His response was something like "Listen, after the movie was done I was just glad that they didn't make it into a musical."

Being a car buff my wife and I recently went to see "Ford vs. Ferrari" although my wife was reluctant to go with me because I'm very familiar with the racing during that period and she thought that I would be upset at all the technical flaws. Afterwards she asked me how many I had spotted and I said "I lost count after about 10."

But the best response was from Alfonso Cuarón, the director of the movie "Gravity" with Sandra Bullock and George Clooney. Afterwards he was asked about all the technical flaws in the movie and his response was priceless: "It's a movie! If you want accuracy, go see a documentary!".

Nov-25-19  WorstPlayerEver: Is it just me or does Mozart looks like Spasski?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 15)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
World's Greatest Chess Games- Nunn Emms Burgess
by Patca63
Spassky's Immortal Game
from Memento by Jaredfchess
KG Minis
by fredthebear
pg.148-150, "The Big Book of Chess" by Eric Schiller.
from The Big Book of Chess by Eric Schiller by fredthebear
Game 42
from World's Greatest Chess Games by Anatoly21
DrChopper's good games
by DrChopper
assorted Good games
by rbaglini
from favorite games according to opening c00-c99 by mirage
Best Chess Games of All Time
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Beautiful Endings
by Kingsandsquares
Rook sacrifice.
from Interesting games by hukes70
tedster's favorite games 3
by tedster
from Promotion: Middle Game by Penguincw
Deefstes' favorite games
by Deefstes
Hinchliffe's favorite games
by Hinchliffe
From Russia with love
from Chess History in 64 games by julillo
Fantastic combination!
from Honza Cervenka's favorite games by Honza Cervenka

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC