chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Amos Burn vs Oldrich Duras
18th DSB Kongress (1912), Breslau GER, rd 17, Aug-02
Queen's Gambit Declined: Janowski Variation (D31)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Burn/Duras games
sac: 32...Ra1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-14-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: This reminds me of an even more wild game. In this one,white's queen is trapped in the corner by 2 black pawns on a2 and b2. Both pawns are defended by bishops.
Dec-14-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  technical draw: 36.Ne7x is a tribute to one of our fellow posters-Spitecheck!
Dec-14-03  suenteus po 147: <technical draw> It's not just a spite check! I mean, yeah, Duras spots it, but if there had been time pressure or if Duras had simply been inattentive, he could have just as easily played 36...Kh8?? 37.Nxf7#! So while it is a spite check in the end, I applaud Burn for fighting with his very last breath. It shows that he believed people could be beaten beyond simply logic. Such a tactic would never work against a computer, but people can (and do!) make mistakes, either through frailties, vanity, arrogance, inattention, or whatever else. You'll never know unless you try! Never give up so long as there is a chance!
Dec-14-03  Bears092: <You'll never know unless you try! Never give up so long as there is a chance!>

Indeed. Here is a game of mine from a few months ago (I was black). I know that I made a few mistakes, but that is beside the point. My opponent made an ever bigger one. Can you find it?

[Event "IL HS State '03"]
[Site "Peoria"]
[Date "2003.3.8"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Andrey Gusev (STV)"]
[Black "Dan Laurila (LF)"]
[TimeControl "55/5"]
[Result "0-1"]

1.e4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.d4 Bd6 5.c4 Nf6 6.Bg5 Qe7+ 7.Be3 Bb4+ 8.Nc3 c6 9.Qb3 Be6 10.c5 Bxc3+ 11.Qxc3 Nbd7 12.Bd3 Bg4 13.Ne5 Nxe5 14.dxe5 Nd7 15.h3 Bh5 16.O-O Nxe5 17.Bd4 Nxd3 18.Rfe1 Nxe1 19.Rxe1 f6 20.Rxe7+ Kxe7 21.Qg3 Rhg8 22.Qd6+ Kf7 23.Qc7+ Kg6 24.Qxb7 Rgc8 25.g4 Kh6 26.gxh5 Rab8 27.Qxa7 Ra8 28.Qf7 Rf8 29.Be3+ g5 30.hxg6ep+ Kh5 31.g7+ Rxf7 0-1

Dec-14-03  suenteus po 147: <Bears092> I see what you mean. 18.Rfe1! must have stung since you lose your queen. And of course I would have been quaking in my boots with the combo starting 29.Be3+! Played through properly, it's mate: 31.Qxh7# It's funny how one little mistake can completely turn the tables. I'm guessing White must have had either persistence of vision that the Queen was still defended by the pawn, or thought you were so demoralized that you would move your king, allowing him to take your last two rooks with a dastardly pawn promotion. Kudos to you for playing it out and coming out on top! Never resign!
Dec-15-03  Bears092: I saw 18. Rfe1 coming. I was pretty sure that I would end up with 2 rooks for the queen.

I missed that Be2 saved my queen while jettisoning the bishop.

Jun-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <24.bxa3> The alternative 24.Bc3 leads to some interesting tactics. Duras monograph gives: 24.Bc3 a2 25.Bd3 Bxd3 26.Rxd3 Ba3!! 27.bxa3 Rxc3! 28.Rxc3 b2 29.Rcc1! Rxa3!


click for larger view

and 30.Nd2 bxc1Q+ 31.Rxa1 a1Q ... 0-1. But it seems that White could fight on with 30.Re1, as Black may not have anything much better than 30.bxa1Q Rxa1 with at least a material equality.

Instead, Black can proceed, with lesser fireworks but more convincingly to the point: 24.Bc3 Rxc3! 25.bxc3 a2 26.Bd3 Bxd3 27.Rxd3 b2


click for larger view

with, say, 28.Rdd1 bxa1Q 29.Rxa1 Nb6 ... and an easy win on material.

Jun-16-06  RookFile: Ah yes, here's good old Burn getting slapped around like an A player again.

Of course, chessmetrics reliably informs us he was 2600 player at the time.

Jun-16-06  Bartleby: Indeed, it's too bad <cizio> didn't come swaggering in here claiming that any 2100 player today could beat Burn; he might have had a good shot at proving it.
Jun-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <here's good old Burn getting slapped around like an A player again> Well, good old Burn he was. At 63 years old, he was more than a generation senior to the second oldest participant of the tournament, Dr. Tarrasch (49).

In fact, this is arguably the last serious game of Burn's career; the game was played in the last round of the last big tournament that Burn played in. Burn faced red-hot Duras (29), who in the last 8 days of the tournament collected 7.5 points from 7 games and 1 adjournement (against Rubinstein) to finnish the tournament as a joint winner together with Rubinstein.

Final standigs at Breslau 1912 were: 1-2. Duras-Rubistein, 3. Teichmann, 4-5. Schechter-Tarrasch, 6. Marshall, 7. Spielmann, 8-11. Breyer-Barasz-Przepiorka-Mieses, 12. <Burn> (7.5/17), 13-14. Levitskij-E.Cohn, 15. Carls, 16. Lowcki, 17. K.Treybal, 18. Balla.

Jun-16-06  madlydeeply: Say, how did Ben Finegold do in this challenge of greats?
Jun-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <madlydeeply> ???
Jun-16-06  madlydeeply: --exactly--
Jun-16-06  Bartleby: <Gypsy> On the Morphy vs Anderssen, 1858 page Marmot made the comment that today's GMs (Benjamin Finegold was the example Marmot chose), in a match, could "easily" defeat Steinitz & Lasker (and ipso facto Morphy and Co.), and "at least" draw Alekhine and Botvinnik (we could probably add Keres, Fine, and Euwe to that list).

<Madlydeeply>, being a devout Lasker-phile, fairly went bonkers at the remark (to great hilarity).

Jun-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Bartleby> Thanks for an explanation!

Finegold seems to be a fine player (I had to look him up) -- but Lasker is Lasker.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Grand Promotions
by Gypsy
(4) Burn -- Duras, Breslau 1912
from Battle Chess by suenteus po 147
Mighty impressive black steam roller
from Game collection: GDQ by fredthebear
Battle Chess ~ The Great Spite Check
from Battle Chess ~ Chess Masters on Winning by Reinf by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC