Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mikhail Chigorin vs Emanuel Lasker
St. Petersburg (1895/96), St. Petersburg RUE, rd 3, Dec-17
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense (C52)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 54 times; par: 30 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Chigorin/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-04-06  CowardlyKnight: I imagine he was thinking of something in the lines of 26. Nxd5 Qxd5 27. Rxc4 Rg7 28. Rc1.
Oct-19-06  extremepleasure: Wasn't 13.Qa4 much better than 13.Qe2?
Oct-19-06  FHBradley: It certainly looks so: 13.Qa4 Nc5 14. Qxc6+ Bd7 15.Qd5; and it looks pretty drawish: 15...Be6 16. Qc6+ Bd7; but such continuations are not what Tchigorin was after when he settled for the Evans gambit.
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: And he didn't even bother to castle...
Jan-06-08  JimmyVermeer: According to Staunton's Chessplayers' Handbook, Lasker's 5th move was Ba5, not Bc5. Can anyone confirm which is correct?
Jan-06-08  paladin at large: According to the Weltgeschichte des Schachs, Lasker (Vol. 11) and GM Soltis "Why Lasker Matters", the move Bc5 is correct. (Petersburg, 3rd round, 17 Dec 1895)
Jan-06-08  JimmyVermeer: No wonder Staunton got it wrong - he died 21 years before this game was even played, so how could he have known what the moves were going to be? He doesn't give the date, so maybe it was another Tchigorin vs. another Lasker, and every move was identical except that one. A more plausible theory is that Staunton's book was edited some time afterwards and the new writer was careless in copying down the moves.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: This tournament was a clash of generations (23-year-old Pillsbury and 27-year-old Lasker against 45-year-old Chigorin and 59-year-old Steinitz) but also a clash of openings. Chigorin tried the Evans Gambit four times in this tournament, scoring a draw, two losses and a lone victory when Steinitz blundered in a winning position. Chigorin only dabbled in the Evans after this tournament, and after a famous loss to Pillsbury at London four years later he abandoned it altogether.

Chigorin vs Pillsbury, 1899

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: The position after <25.Qa2>

click for larger view

is on Madagascar miniature sheet no.1810

Mar-13-10  Ulhumbrus: 23...c4 answers the threat of 24 Qe2 which will otherwise fork the B on e6 and the pawn on a6.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <keypusher: ... Chigorin tried the Evans Gambit four times in this tournament, scoring a draw, two losses and a lone victory when Steinitz blundered in a winning position.>

I have not find the Chigorin-Steinitz you reference in the database; is it here?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Gypsy> Chigorin vs Steinitz, 1896

Were you searching for it as an 1895 game?

St. Petersburg 1895-96 (1895)

Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Phony Benoni> Thx friend!

<Were you searching for it as an 1895 game?> Yup, that was the problem.

Jul-11-13  master of defence: Why not 18.Qxg7?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <master of defence: Why not 18.Qxg7?>

If <18.Qxg7 Kd7>, then White is still a pawn down and soon will be on defensive. (i) Immediately, White needs to deals with the pinned unprotected knight on c3. (ii) Black K is safe on d7, while White K is safe no more on the account of the open g-file.

Jul-15-13  RookFile: This is one reason why Lasker was stronger than Steinitz. Lasker had a defense to the Evans Gambit, while Steinitz routinely get slapped around.
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <RookFile> Out of curiousity, I checked Steinitz's record in the Evans Gambit, (with White and Black) seeing as you say he got "slapped around." Out of the 48 games in the database, Steinitz won 24 games, lost 14, and drew 10.

With Black, he won 16 games while losing 13.

Maybe you need to revise your talking points?


Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: I had to delete my prior post.

Mea culpa.

There are two ECO codes for the Evans Gambit. (C51 C52)

Lasker has <16> games in the database with the Evans.

The overall totals are: 9 wins 6 losses 1 draw.

With White: 4 wins 3 losses 1 draw

With Black: 5 wins 3 losses 0 draws

Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Steinitz overall record with the Evans Gambit (C51 C52):

52 wins 25 losses 17 draws.

With White: 19 wins 3 losses 1 draw.

With Black: 33 wins 22 losses 16 draws.

Jul-16-13  JoergWalter: Sreinitz considered the Evans as a real challenge.
Aug-27-13  jerseybob: I remember George Koltanowski showing this game on his late-60's TV show. Lasker's play seemed effortless and magic; of course it was neither, but Kolty made it seem so.
Nov-18-14  Ke2: this is the "bust to the evans gambit", or at least this particular move order (6.d4 is better than 6.O-O)
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <CowardlyKnight: I imagine he was thinking of something in the lines of 26. Nxd5 Qxd5 27. Rxc4 Rg7 28. Rc1.>

Unfortunately Black has 27....Qxg2#. :-) But of course you're right, Chigorin surely had something like that in mind.

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < playground player: And he didn't even bother to castle...>

I am no chess master, but isn't 22...O-O-O considered castling?

Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: What a crushing game. And there is really crushing cute stuff behind the scenes here e.g.

On 18 Qxg7 black has Kd7 !!

click for larger view

122: Mikhail Chigorin - Emanuel Lasker 0-1 3.0, St. Petersburg 1895/96

click for larger view

Analysis by Stockfish 14:

1. -+ (-5.43): 19.Qg3 Qg8 20.Qf3 Qg4 21.Qxg4 Bxg4 22.Nxd5 Bxa1 23.Nf6+ Ke6 24.Nxg4 h5 25.Bg5 hxg4 26.Rxa1 Rhb8 27.Rc1 Rb5 28.f4 gxf3 29.h4 fxg2 30.Kxg2 Rg8

which is a King move that reminds me of a favourite game classic of mine Sowray vs Rogers because I witnessed a post-mortem analysis of them both and was amazed by the abstract comments of Rogers of deciding where to attack - Qside or Kside

P J Sowray vs I Rogers, 1985

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
from Frank124c's Favorite Games--Themes by frank124c
Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense (C52) 0-1Black owns the open lines
from Captain's Crunch Munched by Fredthebear by fredthebear
from 30 Moves Or Less (1857-2018) by Rio Mike
Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense
from ANNOTATED GAMES GTM by gambitfan
Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense (C52) 0-1Black owns the open lines
from Lasker Approved, Fredthebear Applauds by fredthebear
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense
from PLAYER "X" PLAYS VARIATION "X" by gambitfan
from How to Defend in Chess by Colin Crouch game coll by Patca63
Evans Gambit. Lasker Defense (C52) 0-1Black owns the open lines
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
Game 43
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Game 191
from The Golden Treasury of Chess Part 1(Games 1-250) by biglo
Emanuel Lasker's Best Games
by alip
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
Game 43
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Game 43
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by StoppedClock
g2 Rook Sac
from Black wins by Halfpricemidge
Game 43
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by demirchess
Game 55
from World Champion - Lasker (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 5
by 0ZeR0

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC