chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Ernst Falkbeer vs Johann Jacob Loewenthal
Birmingham (1858), London ENG, Sep-17
Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid. Spielmann Attack (C26)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Falkbeer/Loewenthal games
sac: 25.Rxf6+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-17-05  InspiredByMorphy: Incredible game! Falkbeer's play is genius, sacking a bishop (24.Bxh6!)immediately followed by a rook (25.Rxf6!) to leave blacks king in a hopelessy exposed position. I think Morphy would have enjoyed watching this game.
Jan-17-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: 33 e5!! is necessary to keep the combination going, but it occurs 9 moves later.
Oct-08-07  Antiochus: Unbelievable!!
Feb-17-16  zanzibar: Are the colors wrong for this game?

FWIW- <CG> agrees with <Chessbase>.

But I believe the original source is from Staunton, 1859, where the game is given as

<Falkbeer--Loewenthal>

<019/032 <Falkbeer -- Loewenthal (39) 1-0 > Queen's Knight Opening - Played 9/17 (Fri) at St. George's Club>

from <Chess Player's Chronicle v1 S3 (1859) p19/32>

Feb-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: <z> Does NOT agree with Chessbase Big 2002, which has this as the second game of the match, played on 17 September with Loewenthal winning as White.
Feb-13-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: I intend to go into this in greater detail, but, for now, the nub of the problem is that <CPC 1859> gives Falkbeer vs Loewenthal, 1858 (p.17) followed by this game (p.19) with the note (p.20):

<These two games form part of the match played at the Birmingham tournament between the two above-mentioned champions, and were played on the 16th and 17th September.>

Although the games carry no further detail, it has seemed a reasonable assumption that they represent games 1 and 2 of the final. A belief apparently reinforced since the next number of <CPC> gives two further games, Falkbeer vs Loewenthal, 1858 (p.73) and Falkbeer vs Loewenthal, 1858 (p.74) as <Game III> and <Game IV>, respectively.

And yet the final began on Monday, September 13th, according to the <Era> of September 19th, p.5,: <The Birmingham Tournament.- The concluding round in this protracted contest was commenced at the St George's Chess Club, on Monday, between Herren Falkbeer and Lowenthal. Up to this time four games have been played, of which each have won one, and two have been drawn.>

Suffice to say, something's got to give.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
p8riot's Sacrifices
by p8riot
24-
from Game collection: TIM by mughug
Just because I like these games doesnt mean that
by xeroxmachine
pre-Steinitz Era2: 1861 or before
by Antiochus
Chessman1's favorite games 3
by Chessman1
Bishop+Rook sac...
from Collections in Idleness 5 by Trigonometrist
Bishop+Rook sac...
from Collections in Idleness 5 by xajik
Final (C.P.C, 1859, p.19)
from Birmingham 1858 by MissScarlett
Bishop+Rook sac...
from Collections in Idleness 5 by kishchess

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC