chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert James Fischer vs Dragoljub Minic
Vinkovci (1968), Vinkovci YUG, rd 6, Sep-14
King's Gambit: Accepted. Bishop's Gambit (C33)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 32 times; par: 39 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Fischer/Minic games
sac: 20.Ne5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-20-11  Garech: Interesting notes above about which variations Fischer was busting. Some of the lines he discussed transpose to the bishop's gambit, but as <AylerKupp> points out the main focus was 3.Nf3

Ironically enough, the main purpose of 3.Bc4 is to prevent (or at least hinder) an immediate d5 push from black which, if one is following Fischer's 'refutation', is not a move you are going to play any time soon anyway!

Dec-20-11  King Death: < Garech:...Ironically enough, the main purpose of 3.Bc4 is to prevent (or at least hinder) an immediate d5 push from black...>

Not that it always used to stop them in the good old days though: J Schulten vs Morphy, 1857.

Dec-20-11  Lil Swine: <beatgiant:(Hey! Who was that kibbitzer who said Fischer never used smothered mate?)>

i remember there was a smothered mate line for Fischer in " the game of the century", somewhere involving the knight sac

Dec-20-11  Shams: <King Death><Gareth> In his '64 simul tour, Fischer met <3.Bc4 d5> with the bishop capture <4.Bxd5>, now disfavored since Black must surrender the bishop pair.

Fischer vs W Nyman, 1964

I don't know if Bronstein was the first to play <exd5> in such positions, but I think he showed the way.

Dec-20-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: According to Opening Explorer, 3...f5 kicks White's ass. But since only four of the 47 games with that move have been played in the last 40 years, that might have to be taken with a grain of salt.
Dec-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams: <King Death><Gareth> In his '64 simul tour, Fischer met <3.Bc4 d5> with the bishop capture <4.Bxd5>, now disfavored since Black must surrender the bishop pair.>

You mean White.

<I don't know if Bronstein was the first to play <exd5> in such positions>

Nah, NN kicked Staunton's ass with it 170 years ago. NN vs Staunton, 1841

Dec-21-11  Shams: <FSR> Yes, read <White> for <Black>, thanks.

I think this is one of the earlier "modern" games in this line: Bronstein vs Tseshkovsky, 1978

Thanks for the link. I love seeing Staunton die horribly against gambit play. <NN> was in rare form in that game, really good play. I wonder what <NN>'s best career game is considered to be?

Dec-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robed.Bishop: Let's face it, or at least I will: if Fischer busted the gambit, he did so only for players with his vision. For a mere mortal like me, he gave me some excellent insight into one variation that should improve my chances of winning, though it certainly won't guarantee me a win.
Dec-21-11  King Death: That NN has one long career. I don't know why, because his numbers are miserable. Hell man, I could win 20 or so games against some of those players.
Jan-17-13  leka: This Fischer Minic game the move 20.knight e5!!!! is one of te best of Fischer.Even the computers have to thik it.All the others Fischer famous moves against Larsen rook e5! Benkö rook f6! Gligoric rook f6! D.Byrne bishop e6! these moves computer solved under second thinking time
Jan-17-13  RookFile: Fischer knew better than most the power of that bishop on b3.
Jan-17-13  tonsillolith: What is the purpose of <18. g3>? I would have thought it better to play Kg1 immediately.
Jan-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <tonsillolith> 18.g3 is to drive the Black Queen off the f-file, allowing White to attack the f7-square. Fischer had Ne5 in mind when he played g3.
Sep-05-13  Kinghunt: <leka> I guess you're technically correct in that it's not quite an instant find, but on my laptop, Stockfish 4 finds 20. Ne5 in less than two seconds (roughly 1.2 seconds). There are very few moves that machines do not see almost at once.

The following are the only games in this database I am aware of where the computers cannot find a clear win:

Karjakin vs Anand, 2006 24...Nc7!

Short vs Timman, 1991 31. Kh2!

Topalov vs Shirov, 1998 47...Bh3!

Bronstein vs Ljubojevic, 1973 22. Rxc5!

There may be others, but I am not aware of them.

Mar-05-14  SpiritedReposte: For tactics and wild complications I study Tal, Kasparov, Aronian.

For crystal clear ideas and strategy it's Capablanca and Karpov.

For a mix of both its Fischer.

Mar-11-14  tranquilsimplicity: <Nemesistic> I don't wish to be rude but your post seems ambiguous. At first when I read it, I got the impression that it was the 2350 Elo player that played White. But when I read on and you mentioned that he played ...d6. I understood it to mean that he (2350) played the Fischer defence (obviously as Black). Then you concluded that Fischer was a crackpot and that Fischer's defence ..d6, is not a bust to the KG. So I was left wondering whether you were the player with the White or Black pieces. And you added that "..you won't be playing it again"; so I wondered, the KG or ..d6 Fischer defence?

I am a KG player with White. I love this opening and was simply curious to find out the experiences of others when employing or facing the Gambit. However I agree with you regarding Fischer. And I also reject the idea that ..d6 is a bust to the KG. #

Mar-25-14  estrick: Fischer offered some analysis of this opening in Chess Informant 6/301.

He gave his 8th move, Qe2, a "?!" and after 8. ...Be7, 9. c4 Nc7 said the position was equal.

He offers an improvement by way of:

8. c4 Nf6
9. Nf6 Qxf6
10. 0-0 Be7
11. d4 Nd7
12. Qe2! g5
13. Nxg5 Qxg5
14. Bxf4

with a big advantage for White

Mar-26-14  estrick: Checked Fischer's improvement against the silicon.

Fritz actually rates the move Fischer played in the game, 8. Qe2, as tied for best with 8. 0-0, at +0.23. The "improvement," 8. c4, is rated sixth best with an evaluation of -0.21.

8. ...Nf6 is Black's best move. But 9. Nxf6+ is evaluated at -0.33 while 9. Qe2 is given an evaluation of 0.01

9. ...Qxf6 is Black's best choice.
10. 0-0 is White's 3rd best choice here (-0.55). Best is 10. d4 (-0.22).

Fritz says that 10. ...Be7 is Black's 3rd best move, with an evaluation of -0.29. Black's best choices are Na6 & Be6, which both get evaluations of -0.53, a difference of 0.24

11. ...Bg4 is evaluated at -0.33, while ...Nd7 is given +0.10 in favor of White, a difference of 0.43

Instead of 12. ...g5, Nf8 is evaluated at -0.06 which is 0.77 points better than the move Fischer makes Black play here.

13. ...Qxg5 is clearly a bad move.
13. ...Qxd4+ is far and away the best move in this position, with an evaluation of +0.71, a 1.86 point difference.

After 14. Bxf4, White is indeed much better, with an evaluation of +2.57 at 19 ply.

However, Fischer's analysis has Black playing much inferior moves four moves in a row.

8. c4 Nf6
9. Nf6 Qxf6
10. 0-0 Be7
11. d4 Nd7
12. Qe2! g5
13. Nxg5 Qxg5
14. Bxf4

Jan-02-18  Petrosianic: Black is still doing fairly well up to 19...Bh3. It looks nice to win an exchange, but the Rook white loses is immediately replaced by another. So White has as many attackers as before, but Black is down one defender (his QR isn't able to help in the defense). Unless I were playing a much weaker player, I'd probably play 19...Be6. White will still have a small edge do to the isolated KP that will result, but Black's in no danger of getting rolled, and may well be able to defend that game.
Jan-02-18  Petrosianic: do = due
Oct-10-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mountain1: My family are from Vinkovci
Oct-10-18  Ironmanth: Dangerous gamble by Black; classic!
Oct-10-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Petrosianic: do = due>

dew doo!

Oct-10-18  Jack Kerouac: Since we are relying on silicone analysis here, I checked my Chess Challenger 10 from 1982 and it thought bishop to B3 was the winning move. *Smirk*..(Google that machine..)
Feb-24-19  SeanAzarin: Yet more proof that the pin is mightier than the sword. Especially when the piece is pinned to the King.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 71
from book: Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by Baby Hawk
fischer 1
from great attack games by emilio martinez
Gambito de Rey
by Chessdreamer
Vinkovci 1968
from Bobby Fischer: Selected Games from 1955-1992 by fernando.laroca
Game 71
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by AdrianP
Game 71
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by howardb86
KGA Bishop's Gambit (C33) 1-0 Pin f7 & pile on w/Q
from x( C33 ) Fredthebear's K i n g B's G a m b i t by fredthebear
Game 37
from Veliki majstori saha 30 FISCHER (II) -Marovic by Chessdreamer
jMisc Games
by jungol
Game 71
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by demirchess
KG Accepted. Bishop's Gambit (C33) 1-0 Pin f7 & pile on w/Q
from yAttacks and Sacs of f7 Vol. IV by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Fischer Favorites
by atrifix
Game 71
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by Knightf7mate
Fischerman's Friend
from The Best Chess Games (part 3) by Dr Esenville
Brooklyn Bobby
by chocobonbon
a Fischer game for noah
from Noah's Collection by sorokahdeen
KGA
from relue's favorite games by relue
Fischer has a nice trap at the end
from KGA- Bishop Gambit by takattack
Bjelica_125
by Gottschalk

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC