Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Chessgames premium membership fee will increase to $39 per year effective June 15, 2023. Enroll Now!

Robert James Fischer vs Bent Larsen
"Down The Exchange" (game of the day Aug-16-2018)
Fischer - Larsen Candidates Semifinal (1971), Denver, CO USA, rd 5, Jul-18
Sicilian Defense: Fischer-Sozin Attack. Leonhardt Variation (B88)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 40 times; par: 73 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Fischer/Larsen games
sac: 21.Rxe6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-07-09  Eyal: <Garech: Fischer vs T Hartwell, 1964>

I noticed this game (actually already a while ago, when I was going over all of Fischer's games against the Dragon), but didn't include it for the same reason as the game vs. Redolfi - the "sacrifice" (or simply blunder) is incorrect, Fischer was in a losing position for quite a while, but got lucky when his opponent made an awful blunder (here, 41...Rb4??). To paraphrase his famous "sac, sac, mate" commment on the 1958 game vs. Larsen, that was more like - "pry open the h file, sac, sac... ooops - I'm down an exchange with no compensation, ooops - there goes another exchange, well - luckily he missed mate in 4".

But the game vs. Reyes is very nice - somehow I missed it in the "survey". Btw, like most of the other games I went over, when you look at it with an engine, as far as the engine is concerned it's not "really" a sac (or at least not a "speculative" one) in the sense that 12...Rxc3 is considered to be the best move and to give Black a clear, "objective" advantage. As for your question about the game collections - no, I don't think you have to be a premium member to make them.

Nov-09-09  Garech: Another one, this time most of the middlegamme down the exchange due to an early oversight, I think.

Minic vs Fischer, 1967

Nov-10-09  Garech: Also, it would be a travesty to forget this one, although it's an example of one of those where it leads to almost immediate vicroty:

Fischer vs Spassky, 1972

Nov-11-09  Garech: A very creative one that leads to a winning position some ten moves later:

Fischer vs S Hamann, 1968

Nov-11-09  Eyal: <I actually had a quick look at all the KID and Sicilian wins by now, so here are the remaining candidate games that I found:

A Pomar-Salamanca vs Fischer, 1966

<Minic vs Fischer, 1967>

<Fischer vs S Hamann, 1968>

R Byrne vs Fischer, 1971>

Nov-11-09  Eyal: In the Minic vs Fischer game, btw, the sac seems pretty sound although not decisive. In fact, I think that's the only sac of those I've seen so far that truly belongs to the "speculative" or long-term positional class - rather than being a blunder, part of a forcing combination, or leading immediately to a clear advantage.
Nov-16-09  Garech: This is a nice one that leads to a winning position, although I haven't analysed it with Fritz but it certainly looks like it was the strongest move:

Fischer vs H Camara, 1970

Nov-16-09  Eduardo Leon: <Garech>, in the Fischer-Camera game, the exchange sacrifice was justified by the fact that black hadn't castled. He lost a precious tempo by playing 10... ♕a5 only to retreat the queen later with 14... ♕c7. Instead, 10... 0-0 would have been better.
Nov-17-09  Garech: A blitz game, but nonetheless - still a nice one:

R Byrne vs Fischer, 1971

Jan-11-10  Garech: <Reshevsky vs Fischer, 1961;

An accidental one! (I think). But still, he wins!

Oct-29-10  BobCrisp: From a ringside report by a <Robert Sandberg> which appeared in the September 1971 <BCM>:

<The observer looks on with fascination as Larsen, the supreme tactician, is outplayed at every turn. As incredible as it may seem, he is simply no competition for Fischer. He sets up solid positions, with sound strategic goals, and then loses his way, his attention diverted by a tactical flurry. One senses in position after position, that Larsen has run out of ideas. Fischer's chess simply does not allow Larsen to demonstrate the beautiful chess which he has repeatedly demonstrated in recent tournaments. When insightful moves are made, they are generally Fischer's; when tactical skirmishes occur, they are to Fischer's advantage; when the endgame is reached, it is always Larsen struggling to hold on. In the fifth game, Larsen played perhaps ten moves in a dead lost position, uncomprehending. When the game was over, as Fischer was receiving an enthusiastic handshake from one of the judges and rolling applause from the audience, Larsen looked out into the crowd with a pinched, drawn expression, bewildered, confused, and then shambled off, the picture of defeat. With all regard for Fischer's remarkable play, what a sad sight it was to see this other great player so humbled.>

Oct-29-10  parisattack: <BobCrisp: From a ringside report by a <Robert Sandberg> which appeared in the September 1971 <BCM>:>

I watched this match live and can indeed attest that by the third game almost everyone saw 6-0 as a foregone conclusion.

Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Garech>: Looking at the board after 24. c4 the power of piece centralisation is blindingly clear. I wonder what an engine eval of that position would be, seeing as objectively speaking he is one pawn down in material. Great game in any case.>

<<Eyal>: A good engine should recognize a big advantage for White without problems. My own Fritz 10 (which is already a bit outdated) recommends immediately 21.Rxe6 as the best move by far for White, and evaluates the resulting position at about +1 in his favor.>

To bring the discussion about engine evals somewhat up to date, Rybka (Deep Rybka 4 w32.exe dated 5-24-10) evaluates the position as [+0.94] at d=22. Likewise Houdini (Houdini_15_w32.exe dated 12-15-10) evaluates the position as [+0.42] at d=26, and Stockfish (stockfish-201-32-ja.exe dated 1-08-11) evaluates the position as [+1.41], d=35. So all 3 engines evaluate white’s position as being better and all 3 engines suggest that black’s best move is 24...a5.

And, yes, great game in any case.

Apr-10-14  thegoodanarchist: Fischer plays the Fischer Attack... and wins
Apr-10-14  thegoodanarchist: And by move 40 it is HOPELESS for BL but he keeps fighting until the bitter end.
Mar-11-15  PJs Studio: By move 25. White is already in a much better position. After 25. Ra7 blacks pieces are left defending material with little mobility. Regardless of the exchange sacrifice, white wasn't "losing".
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Maybe: "All Bent out of shape"?
Aug-16-18  7he5haman: Is 25...Bc5 26.Bxc5 Rxc5 a better try for Black?

If 27.a3?! Rb8! 28.Bxf7+ Kg7! And Black will win the b-pawn If 27.Rb7! Rcc8 28.b3! And Black still has problems

Aug-16-18  AlicesKnight: A few days ago we had a title "One pawn is not enough" - Wade and O'Connell comment at the end of this game; "One pawn IS enough"....
Aug-16-18  Atking: Each time I see this game I'm deeply impressed. Fischer gives the feeling that the slightest mistake will be fatal.
Aug-16-18  Ironmanth: Masterful maneuvering!
Aug-16-18  Howard: It's been pointed out before that Larsen had good drawing chances in Games 5 and 6, but he chose to go down fighting rather than just quietly back out of the match by playing for draws.

In other words, he was trying to get at least one win under his belt before inevitably losing the match.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: As Levy noted, Larsen was an outstanding practical player who realised that to take draws would be merely pushing Fischer one step closer to the inevitable end; to Larsen's credit, it was never in his nature to go quietly, but as with Bogoljubov in his matches with Alekhine, Larsen's optimism foundered in the face of brilliant judgement backed by superb calculation.
Jul-22-19  N.O.F. NAJDORF: It's uncanny how often players with the black pieces allowed Fischer to dominate the game by placing his king's bishop on c4.

In fact, Fischer did that during his first game with Larsen:

Fischer vs Larsen, 1958

Jul-22-19  N.O.F. NAJDORF: In their 1958 encounter, the bishop retreated to b3 and Larsen didn't take the opportunity to exchange it for his queen's bishop.

It's as if none of Fischer's opponents could grasp the fact that they had to remove his king's bishop in order to minimize his attacking chances.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Sicillian Sozin
by chocaholic
Candidates semifinals Game #5
from Road to the Championship - Bobby Fischer by Fischer of Men
bamanator69's favorite games
by bamanator69
Game 93
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by AdrianP
by yahooman
Hektor's favorite games
by Hektor
Best Chess Games of All Time
by Timothy Glenn Forney
from chernev's games by chessBeaGL
Round 5
from Fischer's 20 consecutive wins by Franz the Stampede
Game 97
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by AdrianP
from Sicillian by Phoenix JS
Fischer Favorites
by atrifix
najdorf games
by russbunn
2B+P > R+B
from Uneven Material by Gypsy
3p vs 3p
from Endgames Kibitzed by FENfiend
1: 43. a6
from Pandolfini's "Bobby Fischer's Outrageous Moves" by blingice
Aimles Larsen
from bitko's 2nd collection by bitko
Round 5
from WCC Index [Fischer-Larsen 1971] by Hesam7
Bobby Fischer's Outrageous Chess Moves
by mobiegobie
K + PP vs K + PP: outside passed P; typical winning position.
from Endgame themes. by Dr. Siggy
plus 102 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC