chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert James Fischer vs Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian
"Mad TV" (game of the day Jul-20-2015)
Fischer - Petrosian Candidates Final (1971), Buenos Aires ARG, rd 7, Oct-19
Sicilian Defense: Kan. Modern Variation (B42)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 54 times; par: 59 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 28 more Fischer/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-23-15  Chessman1504: This is a game that highlights Fischer's true strengths. It left an indelible impression on me, simply because it let me see how well-rounded Fischer really was. Petrosian was no slouch, so such a "straightforward" game must be the work of a chess genius.
Jul-23-15  RookFile: As I recall, some said that 29.....d4 was a mistake. Not hard to understand why Petrosian played it, he didn't want the king to go to d4. White's bishop became a real menace after 29....d4, though.
Jul-23-15  Chessman1504: Yes, the activity of the bishop proves decisive in short order.
Sep-06-15  rea: I was somewhat dumfounded to learn that the loser of this game is merely the first of 3 grandmasters to be named Tigran Petrosian . . .
Dec-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: <rea>, sorry for the late response, but it doesn't surprise me. According to legend, Petrosian became such a great hero in Armenia after winning the world championship that a woman who gave birth to triplets named them Tigran, Vartan and Petros.
Dec-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <rea: I was somewhat dumfounded to learn that the loser of this game is merely the first of 3 grandmasters to be named Tigran Petrosian...>

The loser of this game is the second-highest Elo rated Tigran Petrosian in history.

Dec-16-16  Howard: Uhhhhhh....who was the highest-rated? Or is that a dumb question?
Dec-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Howard> at 2671 the highest-rated Tigran Petrosian is Tigran Levonovich Petrosian
Dec-16-16  Howard: Well...what if you adjust for something commonly referred to as "rating inflation" ?
Dec-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Howard>. That's a good idea. I shall look forward to your results.
Dec-16-16  RookFile: Regardless of what some rating says, not a doubt in the world who the strongest of the 3 was.
Jan-07-17  The Boomerang: Unbelievable postional masterclass from Fischer...the good knight versus bad bishop is a lesson for the ages and transcends chess.
Jan-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: Independently of how many GM's jumped into La Plata River after Fischer played 22.Nxd7, there are clear evident reasons why that would be a very strong move. In the position Fischer had achieved just before he made the exchange, he had two united pawns on the queen side against one, so he could force a passed pawn. Petrosian had a weak and central pawn, that becomes more and more a liability as pieces are exchanged. After the exchange Fischer has then what is roughly the equivalent of an extra passed pawn, and a bishop that has clear diagonals to both flanks. Not only that, he gets to place both his rooks on the open files. So Fischer's move follows the traditional understanding of chess endgames.
Jan-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: It seems to me that the best defense for black after the piece exchange of move 22 is to advance and attack with his d pawn. If he waits white will centralize his King and advance his queenside pawns and quickly slaughter black.
Jul-27-17  Toribio3: Controlling the seventh rank is the theme of the game!
Jul-27-17  sudoplatov: Looks a bit like Tarrasch crushing someone like Walbrodt or von Scheve. Sort of like: 1. get better Pawn Structure, 2. get Bishop vs Knight, 3. Go for Ending. 4. Mate
Sep-20-18  N.O.F. NAJDORF: It amazes me that Fischer's opponents very rarely made any effort to exchange a knight for his king's bishop and allowed him to use it with decisive effect.

Another example of an opponent playing ... d4 and providing Fischer's bishop with the c4 square is the sixth game of the 1972 World Championship match.

May-02-19  N.O.F. NAJDORF: 'where was the point of no return for Petrosian ? In other words, when was the game lost for good ?'

I think Petrosian's two positional mistakes were on moves 6 and 10, because they left him with two isolated pawns and Fischer's overwhelming attack resulted from Black's inability to defend them.

Jul-12-19  N.O.F. NAJDORF: Other match games in which Fischer's king's bishop outplayed Black's knight:

Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971

Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971

Fischer vs Spassky, 1972

Jul-12-19  Petrosianic: <N.O.F. NAJDORF>: <I think Petrosian's two positional mistakes were on moves 6 and 10, because they left him with two isolated pawns and Fischer's overwhelming attack resulted from Black's inability to defend them.>

Well, the position after Move 6 (and also after Move 7, for that matter) was identical to this game, won by Petrosian.

Spassky vs Petrosian, 1969

Fischer varied with 8. c4 (instead of 8. Nd2).

Maybe 10...exd5 is the mistake. Annotators have tried to explain it, but I still prefer Qxd5 or Nxd5.

Jul-12-19  RookFile: I think 1....c5 was the mistake. The Petrov would have been a good choice.
Jul-12-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: There was an annotator who would certainly have agreed: his acerbic comment on Petrosian's collapse at the end of his unsuccessful title defence in 1969 was that, if Petrosian had retained the nerve to bore his audiences by playing the Petroff, he might have retained his championship.
Jul-12-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: <perf> Bob Wade, wasn't it?
Jul-13-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Retireborn>, could not recall for sure, but I believe you are correct.
Jul-13-19  DWINS: <Howard: A mystery for me regarding this game is exactly where was the point of no return for Petrosian ? In other words, when was the game lost for good ?>

This is a difficult question to answer. Robert Byrne says, "Black's only chance to hold this game is 20...Rxe1+ 21.Rxe1 Ne8. Then the king can hold e7 and the knight c7 to keep the rook out, and Black can hope for ... N-c7-e6 and ... K-e7-d6."

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 13)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Bishop v Knight: the verdict (Steve Mayer)
by hms123
12
from 125 Greatest Chess Games by mattgumm
beating the kan
from fav Capablanca & Fischer games by guoduke
Endgames Studies
by rodrigochaves
Game 81
from Golden Dozen (Chernev) by Qindarka
book: Bishop v Knight: the verdict (Steve Mayer)
by Baby Hawk
OneArmedScissor's favorite games
by OneArmedScissor
Fischer - Petrosian Candidates Final (1971)
from Whitefish, MT is up FTB's alley! by fredthebear
(B42) Sicilian, Kan, 34 moves, 1-0
from vaskolon's PAUL MORPHY'S GAMES by vaskolon
estrategias 2 de suetin
by LESTRADAR
Game 24
from Keres, Nei - 4 x 25 by Chessdreamer
July 20: Mad TV
from Game of the Day 2015 by Phony Benoni
Exchanges
from Positional Chess Handbook II by Del ToRo
third element in a absolut seventh
from Who did it first? by lonchaney
Bjelica_125
by Gottschalk
Sicilian Defense: Kan. Modern Variation
from MKD's Sicilian Defense White Compiled by MKD by fredthebear
p. 42
from Stean's Simple Chess by raydot
The Greatest Ever Chess Endgames
by K9Empress
CHESS GENIUS
by Lohika
Fischer's lecture
from 51a2 Black IQP on d5 by whiteshark
plus 244 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC