Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Bent Larsen vs Robert James Fischer
Fischer - Larsen Candidates Semifinal (1971), Denver, CO USA, rd 2, Jul-08
English Opening: Symmetrical Variation. General (A30)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 82 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Larsen/Fischer games
sac: 38...Bxb5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: FSR is right, a Maroczy Bind if I ever saw one!
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: From after White's 5th move through White's 14th move, play is identical, move for move, with Nunn vs P Van der Sterren, 1974 and Nunn vs Igor Ivanov, 1987, both of which reached the Maroczy Bind through the "normal" Accelerated Dragon move order.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Everett: < notyetagm: <notyetagm: What a tremendous game by Fischer this is.> Indeed.>


The shock here is that <neverwillbeagoodplayer> did not shout after every move in typically overwrought fashion.

Or did he?

Mar-28-17  Dave12: 17..Qe5. Fischer violates one of the very basic principles of chess and puts his queen in a middle board danger. Like saying, Mr Larsen, do your work and don't relly on intuition.
Jun-11-17  RookFile: I knows that Fischer won, but if I was shown the position after white's 17th move I would say that white had a crushing advantage. You're right that Fischer saw more deeply into the specifics of the situation.
Jun-27-17  Howard: So, did Larsen ever have a won position ?
Jun-28-17  4tmac: No. Even Piket line 28. Re3! does not win with the 30...d5! improvement. (in fact, the complete Piket line may not win at all but I'm not sure about that) Well played game. 37. Bc4? may lose, not sure, doesn't matter after 38. Rc1?
Jun-29-17  4tmac: 3 comments/questions: (1) all six Taimanov games had a sealed move? (2) no Larsen game, including this one, had a sealed move? (3) the only one LIVE picture from either match (photo from actual game "in progress") was the CL&R cover from Larsen match?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: I think it's true that all six Taimanov games had a sealed move (and the second game had two.) Not sure about the Larsen match.
Jun-29-17  Howard: As far as the comment three comments above this one, are you referring to some analysis that Agur did in a late-1987 issue of Chess Life?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Picture of Fischer v Taimanov 1971 (both complaining about the noise).

It is from this game.

Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971

This position with Fischer to play.

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Same picture but with more details.

Jun-30-17  4tmac: <Retireborn> Taimanov match had 7 adjournments in 6 games! Thems were the days! (although a couple were resigned before resumption) <Howard> 28Re3! was a better try: 28. Re3! Rg8 29. Bxf5+ Kh6 30. Bh3 d5! 30..d5! was better than 30..Rg7 from an interview(?) (don't think Larsen ever had a win) 17..Qe5! Good Game!
Jun-30-17  4tmac: Thanks <Sally Simpson> Great picture! Good article and various views of the Norm theater. When you are playing the Taimanov Sicilian, you need to focus!
Jul-16-18  Howard: Is it possible that Larsen should NOT have taken the f5 pawn on Move 28? Offhand, one might suspect that just leaving the pawn alone--for the time being--might have made it more difficult for Fischer to activate his rooks.

Granted, Fischer would be a pawn up, but it'd be a doubled one.

Jun-03-19  ZonszeinP: This game was lost around the 5th hour of play. I understand that Larsen suffered from diabetes (altough I don't know whether that was already the case at the time)

If he did suffered from it
.I wonder how someone can stand such pressure without losing focus Especially againts such a formidable opponent

Jun-25-20  Howard: Some engine analysis around Move 28 would be helpful.
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Howard:

Some engine analysis around Move 28 would be helpful.>

1) +0.24 (37 ply) 28.Re3 Rg8 29.Bxf5+ Kh6 30.Bh3 d5 31.cxd5 Bxd5 32.Re5 Rd8 33.Rxe7 Rge8 34.Rxe8 Rxe8 35.Kg1 Re1+ 36.Kf2 Ra1 37.Ke3 Kg7 38.g3 Ra2 39.Rf2 Rxa3+ 40.Kd4 Bc6 41.Bg2 Bxg2 42.Rxg2 b6 43.Rb2 a5 44.Kd5 Re3 45.Kc6 Re4 46.bxa5 bxa5 47.Ra2 Re5 48.Ra3 Kg6 49.Kd6 f6 50.h4 Kf5 51.Kc6 Kg6 52.Kb6

2) +0.08 (36 ply) 28.Bxf5+ Kh6 29.a4 Bxa4 30.Re3 Rg8 31.Be4 Bc6 32.Rxf7 Bxe4 33.Rxe4 Rg7 34.Rf5 e5 35.g4 b5 36.cxb5 axb5 37.h4 d5 38.Rh5+ Kg6 39.Re1 Kf7 40.Rf5+ Kg8 41.Kg2 Rxg4+ 42.Kh3 Rg7 43.Rexe5 Rc8 44.Rg5 Rc4 45.Rxd5 Rxb4 46.Rxg7+ Kxg7 47.Rd6 Kh7 48.Rb6 Rd4 49.Rb7+ Kh6 50.Kg2

3) =0.00 (36 ply) 28.Rxf5 Kg7 29.Rg5+ Kf6 30.Rf5+ Kg7

Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <RookFile: I knows that Fischer won, but if I was shown the position after white's 17th move I would say that white had a crushing advantage. You're right that Fischer saw more deeply into the specifics of the situation.>

At 33-ply Stockfish considered Fischer's Qe5 best:

1) +0.38 (33 ply) 17...Qe5 18.Rad1 Ng4 19.Bxg4 gxf5 20.exf5 Qxc3 21.Qxc3 Bxc3 22.c5 Be5 23.Bf3 Bc6 24.Bxc6 Rxc6 25.Rf3 Kg7 26.Rh3 Rh8 27.g4 Rcc8 28.Kg2 f6 29.Kf3 Kf7 30.Rd2 Kg7 31.Rd5 Kf7 32.Rd1 dxc5 33.bxc5 Bb2 34.Rd3 a5 35.Ke4 a4

Jun-26-20  Howard: Thanks very very much for the engine analysis.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I'm baffled that so much kibitzing here is about Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971.
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <offramp:

I'm baffled that so much kibitzing here is about Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971.>

One "6-0" tends to look like another.

May-21-21  Petrosianic: I'm baffled that someone who seems to be against it would not only have nothing to say about this game, but would provide a link to the game he doesn't want to talk about.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: playing through Fischer 1970-72 is like listening to the Beatles.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Petrosianic: I'm baffled that someone who seems to be against it would not only have nothing to say about this game, but would provide a link to the game he doesn't want to talk about.>

I am not <against it>. I am <baffled> by it. I could not figure out why this kibitzing was here, and I gave a link to people of a place where I think that the kibitzing <REALLY REALLY> does have an appropriate place.

There was a load of kibitzing about Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971 and I directed people to Fischer vs Taimanov, 1971.

As I've said, some kibitzing is like <the Undertaker> in WWE. You never know when or where or why or <how> he'll turn up, but he usually does.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
English Opening: Symmetrical (A30) 0-1 BF's Q is asking for it
from yDiagonals Dice & Slice Fredthebear by fredthebear
White cant move his bishop
from DrChopper's study games 3 by DrChopper
22: 37..Ra4 in Pandolfini's "Bobby Fischer's Outrageous Moves"
from Publications by Year and Unconfirmed Source 20 by fredthebear
English Opening: Symmetrical (A30) 0-1 B supports R+
from yCheckmate # Fredthebear Mating Patterns by hought67
22: 37..Ra4
from Pandolfini's "Bobby Fischer's Outrageous Moves" by blingice
Bobby Fischer's Path To World Champion
by LionHeart40
147 inf011 m2
from Finales de Fischer 1 by pepechuy
Larsen vs. Fisher 0-1
from hammering's favorite games by hammering
Game 85
from Veliki majstori saha 30 FISCHER (II) -Marovic by Chessdreamer
Ending: R+B (of same colour)
by Baby Hawk
Candidates, Denver CO 1971 Round #2
from Bobby Fischer: Selected Games from 1955-1992 by wanabe2000
Bobby Fischer
by funnyfamilystar
Game 96
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
from JohnO.O's favorite moves by JohnO.O
# expected
from fav Capablanca & Fischer games by guoduke
58a_Middlegames w/o NN (Knight-less)
by whiteshark

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC