chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Efim Geller vs Tigran V Petrosian
Amsterdam Candidates (1956), Amsterdam NED, rd 1, Mar-27
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Bernstein Defense (E58)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [25151 more games annotated by Stockfish]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 40 more Geller/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-04-03  Resignation Trap: 44...Rc4? was a blunder which made White's win easy. 44...Rc5 was a tougher defense.
Mar-27-06  Resignation Trap: Petrosian's 9...Qc7 was rather rare, but 9...dxc4 10.Bxc4 Qc7 was tried many times at Zurich 1953.

Geller criticized his 10.Qc2, suggesting an immediate 10.a4 and 11.Ba3 instead.

11.cxd5?! allows Black to cramp his opponent with 11...c4! Geller should have tried 11.Ne5.

13...Bg4?! is the first of Petrosian's second-rate moves, and Geller recommended 13...Re8, to be followed by ...g6 and ...Bf5 as a better idea for Black.

16...Nc6?! is inferior to 16...b6 17.a4 Rae8 18.Ba3 Rf6 19.Rfe1 Qf7 20.Nf1 Rfe6 according to Max Euwe.

After 26.e5 White's space advantage is apparent; what was once a weak e-pawn is now a thorn in Black's side.

Geller's 27.Nf1! (threstening 28.Ne3) and 29.Qc1! seriously endanger the Armenian's queen.

With 29...Nxd4, Black gets three pawns for his piece, but the piece prevails.

With 39.Ne3? Geller overlooked a simpler win with 39.Ne7+ and 40.Nxf5, but he had only a few seconds left on his clock to make it to move 40.

The game was adjourned after Black's 40th move and some spectators were surprised to see the game resumed, for Black is lost. His 44...Rc4?? was the final nail in his coffin.

Sep-11-07  skakmiv: <16...Nc6?! is inferior to 16...b6 17.a4 Rae8 18.Ba3 Rf6 19.Rfe1 Qf7 20.Nf1 Rfe6 according to Max Euwe.>

What's the point of 16...b6?

Sep-17-08  PolishPentium: Instead of the text move or the suggested Rc5, why not 44...Rf8, which pins the N?
Jun-23-13  zydeco: Does white have any advantage if black doesn't take the pawn on f3? I'd probably play something like ....Qf7, Nd8, Rg6, Ne6, maybe f4, and the position's so blocked up that white can't do much: black just has to keep an eye on possible breakthroughs with g4 or a5. It's hard to believe that Petrosian really thought he could win with the knight sacrifice on d4.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round One, Game One
from WCC Index [Candidates Tournament, 1956] by Resignation Trap
Geller beats the world champions and pretenders
by ughaibu
Round 1 1956.03.27
from Amsterdam Candidates 1956 by Tabanus
Game 86
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by skisuitof12
Game 86
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Qindarka
Game 86
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Okavango
only one word - brutality!
from sbevan's favorite games by sbevan
NID: Normal. Bernstein Def (E58) 1-0 Notes by Stockfish
from Cowboys and Indians of Lore by fredthebear
Blockade or breakthrough?
from The Application of Chess Theory by xajik
Blockade or breakthrough?
from The Application of Chess Theory by nakul1964
Blockade or breakthrough?
from The Application of Chess Theory by Benzol
gell over petros
from lis great games by gmlisowitz

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC