Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Karl Mayerhofer vs Daniel Harrwitz
London Chess Club t (1851), London ENG
Italian Game: Italian Variation (C50)  ·  1-0



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 165 more games of Harrwitz
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-21-05  Knight13: If you cannot see the game, change the Java Viewer to Sjkbase, MistyBeach or Chess Tutor.

It's funny that Checks in the endgame is so important for Black that he needs to make a check every moove he sees a possible check! You know why. Because White is winning and Black wants to avoid the pawn from promoting by making as much checks and stopping it as possible.

Good game.

Mar-04-16  zanzibar: What's the source of this game?

It is important, since I think it's likely the somewhat famous Mayerhofer win in the <Cup Tourney> aka <London Chess Club Tournament (1851)> (the "other" London tournament).

According to the last supplemental chapter in the German translation of Stauton's <London (1851)> tournament book, this win caused Harrwitz to drop out of the "other" tournament, conceding victory to Anderssen (as far as Harrwitz was concerned that is).

Several years later Staunton referenced this in his infamous <retreating general> diatribe against Harrwitz, found on p180 of <Chess Player's Chronicle v15 (1854)>



Be it remembered that the facts, of which we have given a cursory notice, are not unimportant, as they establish a kind of prima facie evidence, that Herr Harrwitz is a <retreating general>. We have, indeed, for some time been acquainted with his Fabian accomplishments; but, as others are perhaps hardly aware of them, we shall only remark that his behaviour, on the occasion that we have alluded to, was to have been expected from the player, who tried every means in his power to avoid finishing his first match with Mr. Staunton ; ... who <fled even after the loss of a single game, from the scrambling affair of the same year at the London Chess club>, whose whole life, in short, has been devoted to the illustration of the character of the "Runaway Apprentice."


Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <What's the source of this game?>

<Bell's Life for London>, November 23rd 1851, p.5, as cited here:

Briefly but pointedly annotated by George Walker.

After 9...Be6: <Harrwitz plays unlike himself; so weak and shivering.>

Upon 24.Bxh4: <Harrwitz has been fairly out-generalled. We wonder whether he had the head-ache or the heart-affection! When we were of his age we suffered more than once under the latter affliction, but never stooped to plead same in paltry excuse when licked at chess.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Sorry, the correct link is

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
R+ P vs. R+P
from Instructive chess endgames I by Jaredfchess
R+ P vs. R+P
from Instructive chess endgames I by wwall
Bell's Life, 1851.11.23, p.5
from London Chess Club Cup 1851 by MissScarlett

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC