chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs David Janowski
Hastings (1895), Hastings ENG, rd 6, Aug-12
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation. Normal Line (D55)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Richard Teichmann.      [15 more games annotated by Teichmann]

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Lasker/Janowski games
sac: 35.Rxc8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: One of my favorite games from the Hastings tournament, and a harbinger of things to come for Lasker and Janowski.
Sep-14-06  Whitehat1963: What happens if 33...Qxb5?
Sep-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <whitehat1963> I'd play 34. Rxc8+
Sep-14-06  Whitehat1963: Fair enough, but why does, according to Teichmann, 33. Nb5 leave black "defenseless"?
Jan-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Whitehat1963> White is threatening the pawn at d5 and also a knight fork at d6. I don't see a decent defense, e.g. 33...Rd7? 34. Bxf5 or 33...Rf6 34. Nd6 and Black has nothing better than ...Rxd6.
Jun-07-10  YoungEd: It's interesting that Teichmann's annotations really don't give any variations at all, but speak to general prinicples and considerations. I wonder if he played more by principles than by concrete analysis.
Jun-07-10  Boomie: <YoungEd: It's interesting that Teichmann's annotations really don't give any variations at all, but speak to general prinicples and considerations. I wonder if he played more by principles than by concrete analysis.>

Teichmann was known as a capable analyst and he achieved many fine results in major tournaments. His greatest success was Game Collection: Karlsbad 1911 where he finished clear 1st ahead of Rubinstein and other great players.

So he was quite capable and comfortable with "concrete analysis". Personally I prefer the descriptive style as it better reveals how GMs think. I can always load the position into my engine if I want to "pour concrete".

Jun-08-10  YoungEd: Hi, <Boomie>,
Teichmann was of course an astute tactician and calculator; all great players are, and he was indeed great. I still think it's interesting to ask where he fit in along an imaginary "principles-calculations" continuum. We might say that Kotov is an example of one strongly on the side of the "calculations" end of the continuum, whereas perhaps Edward Lasker or Steintiz would be more on the "principles" side (at least, judging from their writings). I agree that the type of commentary given here is more helpful to one like myself.
Jun-08-10  Boomie: <YoungEd: I agree that the type of commentary given here is more helpful to one like myself.>

I would go even farther and say it is more helpful to everyone. If we have a question about a move not played, we can always work it out for ourselves. Or we can leave a question here and the CG analysts will eventually respond.

You will find that those game analysts that include alternate lines are all too frequently wrong. Even the "immortals" like Morphy make mistakes (games annotated by Morphy). By the way, this collection is well worth playing over. Morphy learned chess by studying these games. Game Collection: WCC Index [La Bourdonnais-McDonnell 1834]

The chess computer has removed the need to include lines in analysis. Most analysis today is taken from the engines and nobody dares publish without checking lines with an engine. Besides most of us will not understand the meaning of a line without some description.

Jun-08-10  Marmot PFL: Even with the IQP black seemed fine until he started pushing the f and g pawns. Positional suicide.
Oct-06-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <a harbinger of things to come> This fine turn of phrase was brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
Game #30
from Lasker JNCC by chestofgold
Notes by R. Teichmann
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by fredthebear
harbinger
from keypusher's bookmarked games by keypusher
Hastings 1895
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Notes by R. Teichmann; direct attack on K & pressure on IQP
from yPawn Levers, Rollers, Bones, Forks, + , Promos by fredthebear
Notes by R. Teichmann; direct attack on K & pressure on IQP
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
Game #30
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
bengalcat47's favorite games4
by bengalcat47
geometric mistakes
from Treasure's Ark by Gottschalk
Game #30
from John Nunn's Chess Course by vantheanh
Hastings 1895
by Benzol
Game #30
from JNCC Games by pqmatagi


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC