chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs David Janowski
Hastings (1895), Hastings ENG, rd 6, Aug-12
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation. Normal Line (D55)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [26825 more games annotated by Stockfish]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Lasker/Janowski games
sac: 35.Rxc8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: One of my favorite games from the Hastings tournament, and a harbinger of things to come for Lasker and Janowski.
Sep-14-06  Whitehat1963: What happens if 33...Qxb5?
Sep-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <whitehat1963> I'd play 34. Rxc8+
Sep-14-06  Whitehat1963: Fair enough, but why does, according to Teichmann, 33. Nb5 leave black "defenseless"?
Jan-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Whitehat1963> White is threatening the pawn at d5 and also a knight fork at d6. I don't see a decent defense, e.g. 33...Rd7? 34. Bxf5 or 33...Rf6 34. Nd6 and Black has nothing better than ...Rxd6.
Jun-07-10  YoungEd: It's interesting that Teichmann's annotations really don't give any variations at all, but speak to general prinicples and considerations. I wonder if he played more by principles than by concrete analysis.
Jun-07-10  Boomie: <YoungEd: It's interesting that Teichmann's annotations really don't give any variations at all, but speak to general prinicples and considerations. I wonder if he played more by principles than by concrete analysis.>

Teichmann was known as a capable analyst and he achieved many fine results in major tournaments. His greatest success was Game Collection: Karlsbad 1911 where he finished clear 1st ahead of Rubinstein and other great players.

So he was quite capable and comfortable with "concrete analysis". Personally I prefer the descriptive style as it better reveals how GMs think. I can always load the position into my engine if I want to "pour concrete".

Jun-08-10  YoungEd: Hi, <Boomie>,
Teichmann was of course an astute tactician and calculator; all great players are, and he was indeed great. I still think it's interesting to ask where he fit in along an imaginary "principles-calculations" continuum. We might say that Kotov is an example of one strongly on the side of the "calculations" end of the continuum, whereas perhaps Edward Lasker or Steintiz would be more on the "principles" side (at least, judging from their writings). I agree that the type of commentary given here is more helpful to one like myself.
Jun-08-10  Boomie: <YoungEd: I agree that the type of commentary given here is more helpful to one like myself.>

I would go even farther and say it is more helpful to everyone. If we have a question about a move not played, we can always work it out for ourselves. Or we can leave a question here and the CG analysts will eventually respond.

You will find that those game analysts that include alternate lines are all too frequently wrong. Even the "immortals" like Morphy make mistakes (games annotated by Morphy). By the way, this collection is well worth playing over. Morphy learned chess by studying these games. Game Collection: WCC Index [La Bourdonnais-McDonnell 1834]

The chess computer has removed the need to include lines in analysis. Most analysis today is taken from the engines and nobody dares publish without checking lines with an engine. Besides most of us will not understand the meaning of a line without some description.

Jun-08-10  Marmot PFL: Even with the IQP black seemed fine until he started pushing the f and g pawns. Positional suicide.
Oct-06-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <a harbinger of things to come> This fine turn of phrase was brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.
Dec-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: Nice game showing the strain on pieces when pawns are moved - and how that strain can result in piece configurations that are tactically exploitable.
Dec-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: Interesting how White's 16th through 20th moves are all retreats, but that refocus the attack after Black's weakening moves, rather than abandoning it, a style I've heard called "typical Petrosian" by Tony Miles.
Dec-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <scutigera: Interesting how White's 16th through 20th moves are all retreats, but that refocus the attack after Black's weakening moves, rather than abandoning it, a style I've heard called "typical Petrosian" by Tony Miles.>

Letting your opponent destroy his own position was also typical Petrosian.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game #30
from JNCC Games by pqmatagi
Game #30
from John Nunn's Chess Course copy by ChessMessKnight
bengalcat47's favorite games4
by bengalcat47
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
Game #30
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
Notes by R. Teichmann; direct attack on K & pressure on IQP
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
Game #30
from Lasker JNCC by chestofgold
Notes by R. Teichmann; direct attack on K & pressure on IQP
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
Notes by R. Teichmann; direct attack on K & pressure on IQP
from Strategic Planning Helped Fredthebear Get In/Awa by fredthebear
Notes by R. Teichmann
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by mneuwirth
Hastings 1895
by Benzol
Hastings 1895
by JoseTigranTalFischer
harbinger
from keypusher's bookmarked games by keypusher
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
geometric mistakes
from Treasure's Ark by Gottschalk

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC