chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Janowski vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910), Berlin GER, rd 8, Nov-27
Queen Pawn Game: Colle System (D04)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Janowski/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-19-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Lasker walks a tightrope - when a queen and knight are hovering around your king you are always close to disaster.
Sep-28-06  karik: I wonder why Lasker didn't claim draw. Threefold repetition after moves 49 51 and 61. Well, he did win, though.
Apr-12-07  GrandPatzerSCL: I don't know if the three-fold was put into practice then.
Apr-13-07  TrueFiendish: Janowski should have claimed the draw, but it would have been easy to miss.
Mar-02-08  Knight13: Janowski should be winning at move 32, but he "oversights" too much so he paid the price.
Jul-07-08  JimmyVermeer: karik, I don't wonder why Lasker didn't claim the draw, but I DO wonder why Janowski didn't! I was surprised the 3fold repetition didn't occur sooner. Mark Weeks gives the ending 88 Ke7 Nf5+ 89 Resigns. Perhaps he believed he could win if he broke the pattern. For this arrogance, Janowski deserved to lose the game.
Aug-22-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  wwall: 61.Qd6+ Kb7 is a three-fold repetition of the position, so it should have been a draw.

Instead of 66.Qa8+, White had a perpetual check after 66.Qc8+. Black can't play 66.Kd5? 68.Qg8+ Kc5 (67...Qe6?? 68.Nc7+) 68.Qxb3, winning th knight. So Black must play 66...Kb6 67.Qd8+ Kc5 68.Qc8+ and draw.

Instead of 68.Kh3, perhaps 68.Kg1 Qe3+ 69.Kg2 Nd2 70.Qd5+ Ke7 71.Qd6+ Kf7 72.Nd4 with more resistance.

Instead of 70.Qb7+, perhaps 70.Qh8 Qf6 71.Qh7+ Qf7 72.Qh4+.

Instead of 72.Qf2, perhaps 72.Qb7+ Qf7 73.Qb6 Qd7 74.Nd6.

Instead of 73.Qa7+, perhaps 73.Qb6 Nd2 74.Qa7+ Kh6 75.Qf2 Ne4 76.Qe3+ Ng5 77.Qxe5 Nf3+ 78.Kg2 Nxe5, but this probably wins for Black.

Instead of 74.Qf7, perhaps 74.Qf2+. If 74...Nc5, then 75.Nd4 Ne4 76.Qf8+ Kh7 77.Qf7+ Qg7 78.Qxg7+ Kxg7 79.Nb3 Nc3 80.Kg2 Nxa4 81.Nf3 may draw. Stronger for Black may be 74...Qh5+ 75.Kg2 Qd5+ 76.Kg1 Qd1+ 77.Kg2 Qd2 78.Nd6 Qxf2+ 79.Kxf2 Nc5, threatening 80...b3.

Instead of 77.Qxe3, if 77.Qf7??, then 77...Nf3+ 78.Kg2 Qe2+ 79.Kh3 (79.Kh1 Qh2 mate) Ng5 mate.

Instead of 79...Kg5, 79...g5 looks stronger.

Instead of 82...Ke3, stronger seems 82...g5+ 83.Kh5 (83.Kh3 Ke4) 83...Ne5.

Instead of 85.Kf6, if 85.Nc5, then 85...Ne5+ 86.Kf5 Nxg4! 87.Kxg4 b3 wins.

Jul-26-12  King.Arthur.Brazil: After 30.Qd5+ Kf8 white could play: 31.Bxg7+! (if ...Kxg7 Nf5+ wins the Q, if Qxg7 32.Qxc5+ Ke8 33.Qc6+ etc. Black has ill Bishop and white N has c4 and e3 to play and 1P ahead. Maybe Janowsky loved checks...!
Apr-14-14  zanzibar: Investigating double adjournments I came across a contemporaneous ref to this game of interest:

http://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=...

Nov 30 SF Call reporting Nov 29 Berlin, 1910

<CHESS MASTERS RESUME PLAY

BERLIN, Nov. 29. Play was resumed today in the eighth game of the championship chess match between D. Janowski and Manuel Lasker. This game was adjourned last evening, when Janowski seemed to have a chance of winning, but in the play today Lasker equalized matters and when second adjournment was declared it was, expected a draw will eventually result. The score: Lasker 4, Janowski 0, drawn 3.>

I'm interested in exactly what moves the game was adjourned at... any ideas? Refs would be most appreciated.

(These conditions affect play and are more interesting to me than exact day the game took place on, btw. For example, was newspaper assessment accurate? Etc.)

Apr-15-14  Karpova: <zanzibar>

In a short note on p. 6 of the 'Pester Lloyd' of 1910.11.28, Dr. Emanuel Lasker reports that the game was adjourned after 34 moves (<34...g6> to be exact, according to 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.12.01, p. 9). In the 'Pester Lloyd' of 1910.11.30, p. 9, Dr. Lasker notes that the game was adjourned after 66 moves (<66.Qa8+> to be exact, according to 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.12.03, p. 8).

Apr-15-14  zanzibar: Thanks <Karpova>, I'll use that information to walk through the game.

By the way, what were typical conditions of play? For instance time conditions, and rules of adjournment. Did they use signed moves?

There isn't much on these details on the match page, but they could have a hand in Janowski's purported "erratic" play. I'm curious...

Apr-15-14  zanzibar: I think the answer to my sealed move question is "yes".

According to Oxford Companion sealed moves were introduced in the 1878 Paris tournament, and so it's natural to think the practice was widely adopted shortly thereafter.

Apr-15-14  zanzibar: Guided by <Karpova>'s links in the match link I think I've answered the questions I asked above. Winter's Chess Note's actually has a published version of the conditions. See:

Lasker-Janowski World Championship Match (1910)

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Janowski gives up draw-to lose
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
We both need a shave...
from What a strange long trip.... We veered Offramp by fredthebear
Game #90
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
Game #90
from Lasker JNCC by chestofgold
January, p. 5; February, p. 28 [Game 8 / 2044]
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni
Game #90
from JNCC Games by pqmatagi
Game #90
from John Nunn's Chess Course copy by fredthebear
Game #90
from John Nunn's Chess Course by vantheanh
Longest ever victory by Black in WC.
from Marathon WC games by rcs784
memorable moments from the world chess champs.
by kibitzwc
Game 8, Lasker leads 5-0 (6 1/2-1 1/2)
from 1910 World Chess Championship (second one) by Penguincw
We both need a shave...
from What a strange long trip.... by offramp
lasker best games
by brager
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
72
from Veliki majstori saha 7 LASKER (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC