chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Anatoly Karpov vs Garry Kasparov
Kasparov - Karpov World Championship Match (1987), Seville ESP, rd 9, Nov-04
Gruenfeld Defense: Exchange. Seville Variation (D87)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 192 more Karpov/Kasparov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-15-05  weepingwarrior: The Spassky Variation found it's way back to Karpov's Opening against Kasparov, who dubbed this " The Seville Variation" "Thanks Kasparov, for not only disrespecting Spassky, but also for being so self centered. At least Korchnoi is still active. Your retired!
Apr-27-06  thom: 57. ♕b7+ not ♕c7+
Apr-27-06  blingice: Yes, that does seem wrong.
Apr-27-06  scriabin369: Is 26. e5 ... possibly followed by 27. Ne6 ... 28. Qc1 ...

The plan being that Karpov may have to sac his pawn... though it may not actually be taken... gaining at least an attack on the out of position king

Sep-09-07  nelech: instead of 26 Nd5? 26 Nd3!was winning : 26 ...Nb6 27 Qd2 Kg7 25 Qb2+ Kg8 29 Qb3+ Kh8 30 Rf7
Oct-20-08  Brown: <nelech> Great find! Did you happen to look at 26..Qa3, because I think after the exchange of queens, white will put a rook on f7 with some pressure, but perhaps not enough to win. A long endgame will ensue, with white maybe a pawn up.
Jun-28-09  WhiteRook48: practically the entire match was contested after 14 Kxf1
Jun-30-09  Knight13: <practically the entire match was contested after 14 Kxf1> Until it became a drawn rook endgame on move 62.
Jun-25-13  csmath: Here Kasparov employed new approach with 14. ... cxd4 not happy with the way 5th and 7th game went even though he himself now thinks that 14. ... Qd6 was actually better.

But the real stinker here is the move they did not analize in his camp 21. ... e5?! in his typical active approach to defence.

This could have cost him the game. Kasparov himself has no comment for 24. ... Qd6 even though he had another (perhaps better) option 24. ... Qe7.

By the way on 26. Nd3! as suggested black is not forced to play 26. ... Nb6. Even if so 26. ... Nb6 27. Qd2+ Kg8 29.Qb3+ black does not have to play 29. ... Kh8? but rather 29. ... Nc4 which is what Kasparov suggested in his book on "Modern Chess - Part 3."

Nevertheless because of exposed kind black position is very difficult to hold and perhaps it is strategically lost but there was a possibility. Black would be forced to give a pawn and the best he could hope for is to enter rooks ending that way. Whether that would have been enough to win it is hard to say.

Karpov was surely relentless in those types of situations.

Aug-10-13  csmath: <The Spassky Variation found it's way back to Karpov's Opening against Kasparov, who dubbed this " The Seville Variation" "Thanks Kasparov, for not only disrespecting Spassky, but also for being so self centered. At least Korchnoi is still active. Your retired!>

I did not notice this originally but ...
I think it is really unwarranted comment, excuse me. Spassky did not invent "Spassky" variation either, it has been played by Tolush and Gligoric before Spassky and surely all of the richness of the variation has been expanded to these days.

Most of the times the variation names are given because of certain important events. In this case Sevilla match for WC was one of the greatest WC matches in the history of chess and thus this variation is rightly so christened with the proper name.

Dec-05-13  jrofrano: <csmath> Please provide a game where Bxf7 was played before Karpov played it in this world championship. I was unable to find anything other than some game between two guys I've never heard of Michaelsen and Wegner.
Dec-05-13  RedShield: See Spassky vs Korchnoi, 1955.

In <Kasparov vs Karpov 1986-1987>, Garry notes in Game 5:

<The capture on f7 surprised me, of course. All of us Soviet players grew up on <Kurs Debyutov> by Panov and Estrin, where in black on white it was written that 13.Bxf7+ (after the exchange of pawns on d4) 'does not give any advantage', and 'Black's position fully compensates for the sacrificed pawn'. The same verdict was given by Botvinnik and Estrin in their monograph on the Grunfeld Defence (1979) and by Karpov himself in the Yugoslav <Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings> (1976).>

Dec-13-13  jrofrano: <RedShield> I found that game a few days ago as well. Thanks for the information!
Aug-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: From what I remember, Karpov's score with the 12.Bxf7+ Seville variation is pretty bad.
Aug-18-15  Nerwal: <From what I remember, Karpov's score with the 12.Bxf7+ Seville variation is pretty bad.>

Well, games 5 and 11 of the Seville match were decided by terrible blunders. Karpov's best game in this line is probably the Belfort one (Karpov vs Kasparov, 1988).

Aug-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Nerwal: <From what I remember, Karpov's score with the 12.Bxf7+ Seville variation is pretty bad.> Well, games 5 and 11 of the Seville match were decided by terrible blunders. Karpov's best game in this line is probably the Belfort one (Karpov vs Kasparov, 1988).>

So what was Karpov's score with the Bxf7+ Grunfeld?

Jul-03-20  Howard: The final position was a win for White according to Stockfish ? That’s news to me.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC