chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Anatoly Karpov vs Garry Kasparov
"Rated G" (game of the day Mar-26-2011)
Linares (1993), Linares ESP, rd 10, Mar-09
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation (E86)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 82 times; par: 40 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess

explore this opening
find similar games 192 more Karpov/Kasparov games
sac: 22...c3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Picture from this game:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3jCUDl...

Jun-22-15  RookFile: Karpov was right about the promotion. Making the move correctly was Kaparov's problem. The fact that another queen was not instantly available should have been his problem, not Karpov's.
Jul-05-15  SpiritedReposte: More like rated X! Just nasty play from Kasparov.
Sep-06-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <14...b4!> When playing dxe5? it was rumoured that Karpov missed this. Kasparov was more to the point: <"Did he expect me to resign?"> !!
Sep-06-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Notagm: How about 18Qxb4, not only winning a pawn, but more importantly, putting the Queen on a better square>

The tactical justification of the second pawn sacrifice is based on hard-to see- moves, <18...c5! 19.Bxc5 Nxc5!>


click for larger view

which is a -again- puzzle in itself.

Sep-16-15  Rookiepawn: <Notagm: How about 18Qxb4, not only winning a pawn, but more importantly, putting the Queen on a better square>

The problem seems to be the lost of control on e3, a jump of the BN there would threaten too many things: the WR on e1 and c2. That's why W tries to get rid of it first with 18. h3.

Feb-27-16  yurikvelo: 14.f4? - decisive Karpov mistake.
15.Nb1? only shortened lose

full game multiPV: http://pastebin.com/5q9bhvXv

<How about 18Qxb4, not only winning a pawn, but more importantly, putting the Queen on a better square> 18. .. Ne3! and white cannot prevent Nc2+ "fork":
19. Rd2 Nc2+ 20. Rxc2 Rxc2
Black have R vs NP.
Furthemore black force exchange of black Bishop (at a6) for white Rook h1. Estimated is +M39

Dec-02-17  Saniyat24: One of the best puns, for sure...!
Dec-02-17  Saniyat24: ha ha 19.Qg1...only Karpov can think of this...!
Dec-02-17  Howard: For the record, Inside Chess stated back in 1989 that Karpov knew "how to use the first rank better than anyone--past or present".

Whether his 19.Qg1 move is a valid example of that, may be debatable though. But I can recall at least several instances of Karpov making a strong first-rank move.

Game 9 of Karpov-Spassky is a very typical example! Remember how he retreated a knight to b1 in that game ?!

Dec-02-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: How about L Christiansen vs Karpov, 1993?
Dec-02-17  Howard: You may be overlooking one little thing...it was Christiansen who effectively utilized the first rank in that game---it certainly wasn't Karpov!
Dec-02-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: You may be overlooking one little thing - irony.
Dec-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Interesting event in this game, and it turned into a <cg> Holiday Puzzle clue:

< " ... In this game Kasparov intended to play 24...cxd1=Q+ but without a second queen handy, he pointed to the black pawn and said "Ferz!" (Russian for the queen chess piece). According to some accounts, Karpov then cheekily played QxN, pointing to the pawn and saying "Slon!" (Russian for elephant, i.e. bishop). The clocks were stopped, and an arbiter quickly located a second queen. Karpov was given an extra two minutes as Kasparov's play was a technical infraction, but Kasparov won in a few more moves." >

(2017, #48)

Dec-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: Kasparov's play was not an infraction, though. It just makes clear that the FIDE are a bunch of jerks for not supplying a second Queen during a WCC.

Let's say Brasil plays the final against Germany, and they have to wait for a second ball for a while, when something happens to the ball in play.

It's completely ridiculous.

Dec-21-17  Olavi: <WorstPlayerEver: It just makes clear that the FIDE are a bunch of jerks for not supplying a second Queen during a WCC.>

When did the FIDE do that?

Dec-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: <Olavi>

I was kidding. Karpov had muffled the second Queen just after he realized what was going to happen.

Dec-21-17  Olavi: That's better ;-)
Sep-07-18  Caleb554: leka: I think you are not correct in your comparison of today's crop of players to that of older generations.

Radjabov beat Kasparov when he was 15 or 16. Carlsen drew with Kasparov and was seriously pressing him in a rapid game when he was 13. Computers have bought a lot more new possibilities into chess and the current generation of players are strongest ever because of that.

Carlsen,Giri, Caruana, So, Nakamura, Grischuk, Karjakin etc became grandmasters at a very young age ranging from 12-15. They were beating grand-masters before they got into their teens. Computers have made it possible to learn all the chess theory and strategy very very quickly. Something one got after decades of serious study is now readily accessible to all. In that sense Capa, Kasparov or Lasker or not stronger than today's players.

Even if they study and work very hard, I think they all would be rated in between 2750-2800, and it all depends on over the board play. It is not because they are not talented, but because chess players today, can see and understand 100's of positions within a few hours, can try many different opening ideas. In the good old days, people studied a position for lot more hours and days.

Dec-10-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: < RookFile: Karpov was right about the promotion. Making the move correctly was Kaparov's problem. The fact that another queen was not instantly available should have been his problem, not Karpov's. >

This would make a great cartoon in a chess book annotating the game while relating the story... ♔asparov stands up and announces..
"A ♕ueen! A ♕ueen! Half my ♔ingdom for a ♕ueen!"

Dec-10-18  ChessHigherCat: Karpov must have lost his kryogenic kool after 22...c3
Apr-12-19  Fanques Fair: 14-... , b4 !! is an incredible piece of preparation by Kasparov ! If White accepts the second pawn sacrifice there follows 15-Qxb4 , c5 ! , 16-Bxc5, Nxc5! and now if White takes Black's lady 17-Rxd8, Rxd8! the threat of any of the knights playing the fork Nd3+ forces 18-Nc1 , Bf8! , with White underdeveloped and his Queen harassed with gains of tempo : 19- Qb5, Ba6 !, or 19 - Qb6, Bb7.


click for larger view

Apr-12-19  Granny O Doul: <Kasparov's play was not an infraction, though. It just makes clear that the FIDE are a bunch of jerks for not supplying a second Queen during a WCC> A strong event, for sure, but this was not a WCC.
Jul-30-19  The Boomerang: Caleb554

"sen,Giri, Caruana, So, Nakamura, Grischuk, Karjakin etc became grandmasters at a very young age ranging from 12-15. They were beating grand-masters before they got into their teens. Computers have made it possible to learn all the chess theory and strategy very very quickly. Something one got after decades of serious study is now readily accessible to all. In that sense Capa, Kasparov or Lasker or not stronger than today's players.

Even if they study and work very hard, I think they all would be rated in between 2750-2800, and it all depends on over the board play. It is not because they are not talented, but because chess players today, can see and understand 100's of positions within a few hours, can try many different opening ideas. In the good old days, people studied a position for lot more hours and days"

So that group of players if playing in the 80s and 90s would be equal to Kasparov?

You said they are even stronger. But let's think relative strength and ability. Not absolute strength with the added elo from todaya super computers.

Id say none of them would equal Garry except for Carlsen.

Aug-27-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: The arrangement of White's pieces after 22...c3 is mind-blowing; hard to believe they belong to Karpov. Had I the White pieces, would have played until checkmate. The game's lost anyway, and the mating patterns are rare and amazing.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
KID Saemisch (E86) 0-1 GK's most dominating victory over Karpov
from Briefly Mostly A-D-E by fredthebear
KID Saemisch (E86) 0-1 GK's most dominating victory over Karpov
from KP ef3g45 Holder overs by fredthebear
working on
by wwm
Karpov vs. the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by niazidarwish
CLUB Line (black): King's Indian
by lomez
senakash's favorite games garry
by senakash
Partidas
by damafe
THE GAME THAT NEED TONS OF ANALYSIS !!!
by indoknight
Sacrifice and Initiative (Sokolov)
by Friedeggsof
Tim Krabbe's
by W O C E
Pawn Structure and Tactical Battle (after 12.cxb5?)
from Chessmaster games by Scardini
Karpov is simply overwhelmed
from The Greatest Games of all Time by JoseTigranTalFischer
#25. score 85 Unmissable-the famous slaughter over AK
from 100 Best Chess Games of the 20th Century, RANKED by SirChrislov
March 26: Rated G
from Game of the Day 2011 by Phony Benoni
Game 38
from Modern Chess 4 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
100 best games of 20th century by Andrew Soltis
by nakul1964
Hilarious games
by gazzawhite

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC