chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Anatoly Karpov vs Boris Spassky
Karpov - Spassky Candidates Semifinal (1974), Leningrad URS, rd 3, Apr-17
King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation. General (E91)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 90 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 42 more Karpov/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-29-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sastre: <55...Nf6 56.d7 Bxa5 57.Re8 Nxd7 58.Re4+ Kxf5 59.Re7+ Kf4 60.Rxd7 b6 61.Ra7> wins.
Nov-29-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: if 55...Nf6 even 56 d7 wins, but Karpov probably would play the more accurate 56 Re6 first, tying up Black completely.

There is no preventing d7 and Re8, as White has Re4+ if the knight moves, picking up a piece with discovery next move.

Nov-29-10  BarcelonaFirenze: Spassky said that, in his opinion, Fischer would have beaten Karpov had he played in 1975...
Jan-04-11  M.D. Wilson: Spassky also said that Karpov would have won the rematch in 1978.
Jan-04-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: If one is interested in opinions,
lets see what Botvinnik said about the Larsen match:

"It is hard to say how their match will end, but it is clear that such an easy victory as in Vancouver (against Taimanov) will not be given to Fischer. I think Larsen has unpleasant surprises in store for him, all the more since having dealt with Taimanov thus (a 6-0 victory), Fischer will want to do just the same to Larsen and this is impossible." -- Mikhail Botvinnik

Funny thing, I bet Botvinnik thought
he had a "winning" prediction, after
all it had never been done before.
(well, except for Fischer in the previous match)

Ahhhh opinons, 100% accurate.
(I wonder how many predicted Fischer would go 6-0, 6-0? (heh, heh) My guess would be none.

Amazing how many unplayed games Fischer has lost.

Jan-04-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Perhaps a little jealousy on the part of Botvinnik?
Jan-21-11  M.D. Wilson: No one gave Alekhine a chance in 1927 either, and look what happened there.
Jan-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: I'm sure Alekhine-Euwe World Championship Match (1935) also made the chessbookies go wild.
Aug-22-12  Everett: <tamar: Karpov turned into a large spider in these type positions, laying elaborate traps.>

Nicely said. I like it.

Another indication of Karpov's style was shown with his 30.Bxg5. Even if the piece sac was unsound, Karpov feels his position is strong enough to deal with the pseudo-active N on d4.

That is what made Karpov so great. He offered his opponents only semblances of activity and the initiative.

Aug-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Karpov had his limitations.Kasparov exploited these but so would've Fischer..
Aug-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: And for the 1000th time, the Spassky Karpov played in the 70's was NOT the same 60's model.
Mar-03-15  falso contacto: then I started playing 1.d4.
Mar-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Sneaky: I'm sure Alekhine-Euwe World Championship Match (1935) also made the chessbookies go wild.>

In 1935 in England the bookmakers spoke about little else.

Apr-08-16  Everett: <Aug-22-12 harrylime: And for the 1000th time, the Spassky Karpov played in the 70's was NOT the same 60's model.>

That's right, both Fischer and Karpov did not play the 64-69 Spassky. Keres, Geller, Tal, Korchnoi and Larsen did, and each were beaten. Most of Spassky's match victories weren't even close, '68 in particular.

Apr-09-16  ewan14: Boris Spassky's best years were 1961 ( 2nd 1961 ussr champiobship ) to 1969

He had to qualify for the 1963 championship
and then after it win the ridiculous tournament of
Six

Apr-09-16  Howard: It was seven players, not six (don't know why it was an odd number, though).

Spassky finished clear first with a +2 score, despite the fact that he started out with -2 after four rounds!

Apr-09-16  Atking: 25...f6 Black should hold this position
Apr-10-16  Everett: <ewan> Spassky didn't need to win it, just top 3. USSR Zonal (1964) But yes, it was a ridiculous field, almost as tough as the US championship, haha.
Apr-10-16  Howard: True---the top three players advanced, so taking first place wasn't really essential...

...but you gotta hand it to Spassky! He could have hardly gotten off to a worse start in the first four rounds, but he nevertheless finished clear first.

Normally though, a final score of +2 would not have sufficed for clear first in a 12-game event, but that was the case here.

Apr-10-16  ewan14: Kholmov was robbed of his rightful interzonal place because of Smyslov

per Korchnoi

Apr-18-16  Everett: <...but you gotta hand it to Spassky! He could have hardly gotten off to a worse start in the first four rounds, but he nevertheless finished clear first.>

No, clear first did not matter to the others who made <top 3>. So I don't <hand it to Spassky>. It didn't matter.

Apr-27-16  Howard: Maybe first place in that event didn't count much more than third....but I still say Spassky deserved tremendous credit for making such a tremendous comeback.

I will concede one point though....Spassky's final score of 7/12 would normally have not been good enough for clear first. But this exceptionally strong event was one where no one was really able to rack up a substantial plus-score, but Spassky's point-total just happened to be better than everyone else's, so he somewhat "accidentally" ended up in clear first.

Sep-20-17  edubueno: Esta partida de BS es menos entendible que la número 2.
Jan-05-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: So what is black's compensation after 30.exf5? When black plays an eventual ...e4 Ra3 seems to guard against all threats. Ra3 protects the knight and removes the rook from the a1 h8 diagonal.

Was Spassky just trying to mix it up?

Oct-22-20  lentil: Amusing final position. B has no defense against 56 Re4+ Kxf5 then a discovered check to win either the N or B.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
58
from OMGP V by keypusher
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by KingG
Game 58
from On My Great Predecessors 5 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Candidates Semi-Finals Game #3
from Road to the Championship - Anatoli Karpov by suenteus po 147
33
from Anatoly Karpov - My Best 300 Games by Incremental
Match Karpov!
by amadeus
Game 58
from book: Kasparov's O.M.G.P. part 5 by Baby Hawk
Game 58
from On My Great Predecessors 5 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
How Karpov Wins 2nd Edition
by SantGG
Anatoly Karpov
by blues66
KID. Orthodox Variation. General (E91) 1-0 Notes by Stockfish
from Cowboys and Indians More by fredthebear
33.
from Anatoly Karpov - My 300 Best Games by YuanTi
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by Jorome23
Devious chess
by GrahamClayton
positional sacs
by obrit
Game 3
from WCC Index [Karpov-Spassky 1974] by Hesam7
Karpov vs. the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
33
from Anatoly Karpov - My Best 300 Games by webbing1947
Book of Samurai's favorite games 7
by Book of Samurai
Instructive Karpov Games
by Billy Ray Valentine
plus 26 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC