Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Anatoly Karpov vs Mikhail Tal
"Reynolds' Wrap" (game of the day Jul-09-2018)
Bugojno (1980), Bugojno BIH, rd 8, May-??
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran. Reynolds' Variation (D48)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 31 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Karpov/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-04-09  totololo: I checked the link
1. It is only a partial library as major tournaments are missing - where Fischer participated and there is literature here to support the crosscheck.

2. I look in 1953/54 in 3 international tournaments : Hastings,Zurich,Bucharest . Generally, more then 75% of the inter-russian games are short draws under 20 moves ....Doesn't seem to through games but relaxed play. - Ferocious with the other participants -

3. Bled '61 - Fischer second behind world Champion Tal . Fischer scores 3.5/4 against the russian delegation to make sure that he can reach the podium..... Tal was preparing his re-match with Botvinnik - excellent form but Fischer still won the game. 3. Havana65/66, Soussa missing
4. Still a lot of short draws in other int tournamnets ( in the western EU . It seems that the rules were very relaxed in the participation in Eastern Europe)

I read in these pages about a chinese sportif accepting proudly the pre-arangement for political reasons in a badmington match.... same should apply to "Russia with love" era.

I understand now Soljenitzn.... more I read more I start to believe that Keres was under high pressure to stay low in WC .... It will be interesting to see what Spassky and Kortchnoi living in France and Switzerland have to say ... if they would want to talk about old wounds. I sincerly hope that this is over. Mr. Kasparov who is not anymore involved in the competition could tell more about present day practice...

Who will be the reporter to make such interesting interviews? Just a suggestion. Cleaning the plates....

In conclusion clear draws where done , full points difficult to say , not enough information - tournament continue digging

Jun-11-09  euripides: <Something was clearly amiss with Tal in this tournament.> Jon Speelman says that Tal suffered a bereavement between his 1979 interzonal triumph and his subsequent failure in the candidates' matches against Polugaevsky (in the series that led up to Karpov-Korchnoi 1981). I'm not sure of the exact dates.
Jun-11-09  Granny O Doul: Yes, Tal lost his brother not long before his '80 match with Polu.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Odd statistic, in the database Tal v. Karpov is 19 draws and one win (classical chess), this being the only decisive game. Looks drawish without much material on the board, but Karpov eliminates the black pawn cover and commits regicide.
Feb-06-15  carpovius: wow! very good conspiracy theories produced by totololo. congrats!! plz, keep digging!!! the way to a psychiatric clinic...

i hope2see+ kibitz about chess itself:)

Premium Chessgames Member
  profK: I would also suggest that 19 draws of of 20 games defies probability. Perhaps Tal was one of Karpov's heroes.
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Did Tal ever take so many short draws in another tournament?>

To my knowledge he played quite many short draws in his very last tournament, due to poor health. But he won his last game.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Curses! Foiled Again!
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This is the Reynolds Variation. "Reynolds Wrap" is a type of organic cling-film made from solidified vitreous humour and used to protect food.
Jul-09-18  Granny O Doul: CHC--I assume you meant 13. Ne5, though you say 13. Nd5 in one place, and 13. Ne4 in another. Beyond that, I'm not computer savvy so I don't know, but it seems like too tiny a difference in eval to worry about.

I seem to recall from Gligoric's annotations that 14. Re1 was the TN.

Maybe after a few drinks Tal said the game was prearranged, but once he was drunk, he admitted it was legit.

Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <Granny O Doul: CHC--I assume you meant 13. Ne5"

Right, sorry, a picture speaks a thousand words:

click for larger view

13. Ne5

I won't claim to have included a mistake in notation because that's the only way anybody ever answers, but it's true!

Anyway, if SF rates that as more favorable than castling, why does it recommend castling?

Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: Corrected version of original post:

ChessHigherCat: Can any computer-savvy kibbitzer please explain this to me: I thought 13. Ne5 looked interesting so I asked SF and it says:

1) +0.12 (20 ply) 13.Ne5 Qe7 14.Nxd3 b4 15.Ne2 Qxe4 16.O-O

Then I asked for its recommendation for move 13 and it says to castle, even though the advantage is smaller:

1) +0.08 (28 ply) 13.O-O Bb7 14.Re1 Be7

This raises a number of questions, such as:


Wa dat?

Wudda ^%$@?

I would greatly appreciate any light you may shed on any of the foregoing queries.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <ChessHigherCat: ...
1) +0.12 (20 ply) 13.Ne5 Qe7 14.Nxd3 b4 15.Ne2 Qxe4 16.O-O

Then I asked for its recommendation for move 13 and it says to castle, even though the advantage is smaller:

1) +0.08 (28 ply) 13.O-O Bb7 14.Re1 Be7 ...>

Surely it is the difference in the number of ply.

For 13.Ne5 SF had a look up to 20 ply and gauged it as +0.12.

THEN it had a look right along to 28 ply. Its evaluation changed - at that horizon 13.Ne5 no longer looked as good as 13.0-0, and it revised its whole opinion of White's position slightly downward.

Jul-09-18  Autoreparaturwerkbau: It is interesting how huge the difference between correct <26...Red8> (eval. +0,58) and actually played <26...Rcd8> (eval. +2,29) is in terms of evaluation and how small it seems as in "it's irrelevant which rook i put on d8, isnt it?".

Far from irrelevant, it turns out.

Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <offramp> Many thanks to the associated members of the Bearded Leprechaun Think Tank, a non-non-prophet organization.
Jul-09-18  Howard: Yes, 14.Re1 was a TN according to Gligoric's Game of the Month column.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Howard: Yes, 14.Re1 was a TN according to Gligoric's Game of the Month column>

It was also his Lock of the Week. Remind me to look that up.

Jul-09-18  Howard: How do you mean "Lock of the Week" ?
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <offramp> a TN = 1/5 of a lock at room temperature
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: From what I remember Gligo used to give tips on upcoming games based on rating, past performance, age and (I could never figure this out) wind resistance.

A week before this game he predicted a resounding 1-0 to Karpov. It was his Lock of the Week.

Jul-09-18  cormier: Analysis by Houdini 4: d 24 dpa

<1. + / = (0.50): 26...g5> 27.Nd3 Nd5 28.a5+ Ka7 29.a6 Bc6 30.Ne5 Ne3 31.Rd3 Nc4 32.Bc5+ Ka8 33.Nxc6 Rxc6 34.Rd5 f6 35.Bd4 Ne3 36.Rc5 Rd6 37.Bxe3 Rxe3 38.a7 Re8 39.Rxb5 Rd7 40.Rb6 f5 41.Rb5 Rf8 42.Raa5 g4 43.Rxf5 Rxf5 44.Rxf5 gxf3 45.Rxf3 Kxa7 46.Rf6 Kb7 47.Kf2 Rd2+

2. + / = (0.61): 26...Red8 27.axb5 g5 28.Be5 Rxd1+ 29.Rxd1 gxf4 30.Bxf6 Kxb5 31.h4 Rc5 32.Bg5 Bc8 33.Bxf4 Be6 34.Rb1+ Kc6 35.Kf2 Rc2+ 36.Kg3 Re2 37.Rb8 Bf5 38.Rg8 Bg6 39.Bg5 h5 40.Rc8+ Kd6 41.Bf6 Bh7

Jul-09-18  cunctatorg: Mikhail Tal was in super-form from, say, 1976 until the strongest Montreal Tournament (back in 1979) but his play suffered a very serious decline soon after that; as an example he had been defeated by Lev Polugaevski, during their Candidates' match at 1980 by 3-0... You can also see that his performance during this Bugojno tournament was quite mediocre. A kibitzer wrote something about his brother's death (?), someone else could speculate something about his fragile health or even a combination of these causes bu the bottom line is that obviously Tal's play suffered a heaviest decline that year.

Mikhail Tal was a greatest player and his play had been enriched and improved during his life but Anatoly Karpov's only real rival was Victor Korchnoi at the seventies and Garry Kasparov at the eighties and nineties...

Jul-10-18  Howard: Regarding Tal's lackluster 1980 results (after being ranked #2 at the beginning of the year!) were also attributable to his mother's death that year--not just that of his brother.

In fact, he wasn't even in the world's top-15 at the beginning of 1981.

Karpov, incidentally, also had a subpar 1980---for a WC, at least.

Nov-08-19  cunctatorg: What is the meaning of the acronym TN?

Chessical acronyms aside, there aren't today such greatest and fascinating players as Kasparov, Karpov, Tal and Korchnoi, not to mention RJF...

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <cunctatorg>
TN = "theoretical novelty" i.e. the first time a certain move appeared in a certain position in master play.

As for "greatest and fascinating" characters, there is certainly no shortage of very strong players with colorful human foibles today, but maybe we don't have the perspective yet to be able to mythologize them.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
1980 Winner: Anatoly Karpov
from Best of the Best by Penguincw
Meran and Chigorin Variations
from Play the Queen's Gambit (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by Psihadal
"Chess Genius Karpov" - Victor Baturinsky
by Karpova
July 9: Reynolds' Wrap
from Game of the Day 2018 by Phony Benoni
The tactician outplayed!!
from Simply Karpov!!, Simply Superb!! by Open Defence
It takes one to know one...
from Having fun with the QP by yiotta
Karpov Tournament Champion - I
by amadeus
Power Chess - Karpov
by Anatoly21
Meran and Chigorin Variations
from Play the Queen's Gambit (Marovic) by Chessdreamr by fredthebear
Game 80
from On My Great Predecessors 5 (Kasparov) by isfsam
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by SantGG
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by Patca63
Semi Slav : Meran
by ISeth
1980#7 Karpov simply plays spectacularly
from Notable Chessgames of the 1980's by Jaredfchess
Book of Samurai's favorite games 8
by Book of Samurai
Anatoly Karpov
by blues66
from Anatoly Karpov - My Best 300 Games by Incremental
Anatoli Karpov beat Mikhail Tal 1 to 0, with 19 draws
from Karpov vs. the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
from Anatoly Karpov - My Best 300 Games by jakaiden
plus 33 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC