Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Viktor Korchnoi vs Anatoly Karpov
"Pop the Korch" (game of the day May-12-2018)
Karpov - Korchnoi World Championship Match (1981), Merano ITA, rd 9, Oct-24
Queen's Gambit Declined: Uhlmann Variation (D30)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 33 times; par: 77 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 120 more Korchnoi/Karpov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-06-15  Olavi: The older move 7... b6 is analyzed in connection with other games - Petrosian - Portisch, I think. It's also fully playable; 7...dxc4 gives no winning chances if white isn't overambitious, so also Karpov used 7...b6 later.

It's the staggering simplicity of 7...dxc4 that is so much appreciated, I think, in a position where it was considered bad.

Oct-09-17  Howard: Just looked at the CL issue from early 1982 which analyzed this particular game.

It stated that according to Najdorf, 7...dxc4 had probably never been tried before up until then.

Just a bit hard to believe. It looks like a fairly obvious move, and it's surprising that no one had previously given it a go.

But, hey, Karpov won a very good game here!

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Howard> I undertook the radical expedient of checking Opening Explorer. Forintos played 7....dxc4 back in 1962, but missed the key ...Nc6 followup.

Portisch vs G Forintos, 1962

There are fewer examples of the position after 7.Rc1 than you might expect; usually White plays e2-e3 earlier.

There are more comprehensive databases out that there I haven't checked.

Oct-10-17  Howard: And, according to Kasparov's MGP, 7...dxc4 was tried in at least a few subsequent games post-1981. Don't know though if that move has, perhaps, been superseded by a different one.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: I do believe this GOTD is for <thegoodanarchist>.
May-12-18  Saniyat24: Check it out, <thegoodanarchist> no junk today...!
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: This game's a beaut!

<offramp> Nice post from 6 years ago!

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <CIO> Yes, and I appreciate it too! This is a fantastic positional struggle between two of the greatest masters of heavy-piece endings the world has ever known
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Saniyat > yes, we got a great one today !
May-12-18  cormier:

click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4: d 23 dpa

1. -+ (-1.69): 37.Rf2 Rf5 38.Rxf5 Qxf5 39.Qa1 Rc8 40.Qe1 Rc2 41.d5 Qxd5 42.Qe8+ Kh7 43.Qe4+ Qxe4 44.Rxe4 Rxb2 45.Ra4 Rb5 46.Kf2 g5 47.Ke2 Kg6 48.Kd3 Rb2 49.Rxa5 Rxh2 50.Ke3 h5 51.Rd5 Rb2 52.Rd3 Kf5 53.Kf3 Rb5 54.Ra3 h4 55.gxh4 gxh4

2. -+ (-5.90): 37.Rd1 Re2 38.Qf3 Rde8 39.Raa1 R8e3 40.Qg4 a4 41.Qc8+ Re8 42.Qh3 Qxb2 43.Rab1 Qc2 44.Qf1 a3 45.Qf3 a2 46.Rbc1 Qb2 47.Qc6 Rd8 48.Qf3 Rd2 49.Rf1 Qxd4+ 50.Kh1 f6 51.Ra1 Qb2 52.Kg1 Rxh2 53.Rfe1 Rc2 54.Qe4 Qb6+ 55.Qe3 Qxe3+ 56.Rxe3 Rdd2

May-12-18  cormier:

click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4
<33.Qc2> a5 34.Rxa4 Rc8 35.Rc4 Rxc4 36.Qxc4 Rb5 37.Rd2 Qb7 38.Qe2 Qb6 39.Qg2 Rb4 40.Qf2 Qc6 41.Qe2 g6 42.h4 Qb6 43.Qf2 Kg7 44.Kh2 a4 45.Qe2 Kg8 46.Qf2 Rb3 47.Rc2 Kg7 48.Kh3 Qd8 49.Rc4 a3 50.bxa3 Rxa3 51.Qg2 = / + (-0.67) Depth: 24

May-12-18  cormier:

click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4: d 24 dpa

1. = (-0.14): 23.Rc4 Rd6 24.Qc3 Nc6 25.Ba4 Rc8 26.Bc2 f5 27.Ba4 a6 28.Rc5 b6 29.Bxc6 Rdxc6 30.Rxc6 Rxc6 31.Qd3 b5 32.b3 Qd5 33.Re1 Kf7 34.Rd1 Qe4 35.Qxe4 fxe4 36.Re1 Rc2 37.a3 Rb2 38.Rxe4 Rb1+ 39.Kg2 Rxb3

2. = (-0.16): 23.Rc5 Rd6 24.Qc3 Nd5 25.Bxd5 Rxd5 26.Rc7 Qa4 27.Rd2 Qxa2 28.Rxb7 Qa6 29.Rc7 Qb6 30.Rc5 a5 31.b3 Qa6 32.f3 Qb6 33.Rxd5 Rxd5 34.Kg2 Qb7 35.Rc2 Rb5 36.Qc8+ Qxc8 37.Rxc8+ Kh7 38.Rc3 Rb4 39.Rc7

Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: I would have played 44.Kg1 just to see if my 1750 rated opponent played 44...Qxa8 instead of 44...Rd1.

But I'm not Korchnoi, obviously.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: Karpov could have ended this game more quickly and prettily.

click for larger view

After the self-pinning 41...Rc2! White could resign on the spot, since after the forced 42.Qf1 Black nets queen for rook with 42...Rc1.

May-14-18  Troller: Well, White resigned after two forced moves anyway, so maybe not a big deal. When one sees a clear win, no need to look for anything else. A very fine effort by Black in this game.
May-14-18  Howard: Seems pretty surprising that no one has pointed out 41...Rc2! before, but it indeed seems to force the win...even though Black's position is already completely won anyway.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Howard,

"Seems pretty surprising that no one has pointed out 41...Rc2! before."

Eggman had actually mentioned before in 2005.

Korchnoi vs Karpov, 1981 (kibitz #20)

If 41...Rc2 was the only way to win then Karpov, then at his ultimate peak would have played it.

click for larger view

Here he slipped in 41...g6 knowing the only defence was 42.Qf1 and he must not take the a8 Rook (42...Qxa8) because then 43.Qxf7+ is a perpetual. If Black tries to avoid it 43...Kh8 44. Qf6+ Kg8?? 45.Qxg6+ and White wins.

Korchnoi could have sealed on move 41, but rather than seal and resign he went for this trap (41.QB1+ what else?) . Karpov coldly decided to play on to do the 42...Qc5+ 43...Qd4+ manoeuvre.

41...Rc2 would have been a neat wrap up but Karpov rarely played to the gallery if he saw a clear and simple way before hand. He would not have lost any sleep about not playing or missing 41...Rc2. The text is what he saw coming and played it.

Premium Chessgames Member
  woldsmandriffield: Watson notwithstanding, 19 Rxc6 bxc6 20 Rc1 looks very tough to break down. 23 Rcd3 was also passive and 23 Rc5 Rd6 24 Qc3 might have been tried.

The manner in which Karpov took over the Queenside and then struck in the centre with ..e5 is impressive.

Jan-02-19  Howard: Your line looks rather obvious to anyone playing White, so that in itself makes it suspect.

Kasparov's MGP probably refutes it--but I'm not home right now. Remind me to ....

Jan-04-19  Howard: On second thought...

Kasparov gives a favorable impression of that line, plus he also states that Korchnoi thought for awhile on his move here.

Jan-07-19  Howard: Kramnik--among others--stated that Karpov was an expert at petite combinations--that is, just two-or-three movers.

This game, in my view, is an excellent case. Witness his 30...b6 move, followed by b5.

Apr-29-19  Howard: What if Korchnoi had played 38.Kg2 in response to Karpov's backwards queen move ? I don't see how Karpov would have preceded.
Apr-30-19  Granny O Doul: On 38. Kg2, ...Re1 looks extremely strong.

As for the Informant vote, world championship players seemed always to get a bit more respect. For an ordinary GM to be voted 5th or 6th best game was always quite something. Probably it was somewhat easier for an outsider to make the top TN's list. That's my feeling based on my own incomplete recollection.

May-02-19  Howard: You're right ! Thanks ! Missed that move for some reason.
May-09-19  Howard: Kasparov explains in MGP why 39.Qe1 would still have, nevertheless, lost, but judging from his analysis, that move would have been a harder nut for Karpov to crack. It would certainly have been a better try than meekly taking the a5-pawn, which is what Korchnoi did.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
A game trainer tomohawk recommended
from Select Games by lioric
10 anti isolani 19..Qd6
from 100 Chess Masters Trade Secrets -Soltis by takchess
1981 Winner: Anatoly Karpov
from Best of the Best by Penguincw
Game: 18....Queen's Gambit
from Chess: The Art of Logical Thinking by howardb86
Isolani Strategy
by kenilworthian
My Favourite Human Games
by Saturos
Game 84
from On My Great Predecessors 5 (Kasparov) by isfsam
Game: 18....Queen's Gambit
from Chess: The Art of Logical Thinking by Patca63
Jarocadar's favorite games
by Jarocadar
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 4
by 0ZeR0
m2g9-Karpov wins-not by fork,but by pin
from WC-Korchnoi-Karpov:rivals to the death by kevin86
Volume 32 (7...dxc4)
from Chess Informant Most Important Novelty winners by Chessdreamer
Game 84 in Garry Kasparov on My Great Predecessors, Part 5
from Fictional Atticus Finch Subpoenaed Fredthebear by fredthebear
from OMGP V by keypusher
Anatoly Karpov
by blues66
1981: Anatoly Karpov
from Chess Oscars by hscer
Combatting the isolani by simplification 2
from Game collection: IQP by MicheleLiguori
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by Jorome23
p.42, "Isolated Pawns"
from Watson's Mastering the Chess Openings I, Ch. 3 by tyimfi
Game 84
from On My Great Predecessors 5 (Kasparov) by Gutierrev
plus 80 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC