chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Deep Thought (Computer)
New York (1989), New York, NY USA, rd 2, Oct-22
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Central Variation. Modern Defense (D20)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Kasparov/Deep Thought game
sac: 16.Nc7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-02-04  acirce: <They are no match for the human brain.>

Tell that to Kasparov and Kramnik.

Dec-02-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I can't do it myself but I think that by playing known anti-computer lines that nearly all GMs can beat computers. Why they don't play these lines is a mystery to me. We must all know the lines that I mean; the ones that either close up the position completely or those that offer a piece on g5 with a pawn on h4 before you've castled, thus opening up the h-file. They really can do it - GMs I mean.
Why don't they do it - well, where else is chess sponsorship coming from?
Jan-03-05  Jaymthegenius: I play 1.a3 on Yahoo! at times because they use computers to cheat alot, and 1.a3 is an anti-computer move.
Jan-03-05  Bobsterman3000: Well, at least Deep Thought did manage to inflict doubled A-Pawns on Garry.

LOL

Jan-28-05  Jaymthegenius: In youre profile you say "Kasperov is best of all time!, get over" I disagree, as Kasparov has lost to Karpov, Anand, Ivanchuck, and Kramink in the past. I think it would be better to say Kramnik, Polgar, Karpov, Leko, Svidler, Larsen, Kasparov, Anand, and Ivanchuck are the best of all time, and the fact that Kramnik is world champion but Kasparov is highest rated player proves how flawed the ELO system is.
Jan-28-05  square dance: <jaymthegenius> you moron, kasparov has also beaten all of those people too.
Jun-04-05  Knight13: Hey man. This game is played in 1989. At that time computers weren't strong enought to beat GMs.
Sep-27-05  Averageguy: Why not 18.dxc6 Bxa3 19.cxb7+ K moves 20. bxa8Q ? I know that 18.Bxc6+ wins, but I was just wondering.
Sep-27-05  stephenw: <Knight13> Not true about computers not defeating GMs. See Larsen vs Deep Thought, 1989
Sep-27-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Interesting interview with Kasparov in the Harvard Business Review (Coutu, Diane L., April 1, 2005, Vol. 83, Issue 4, p. 49)
Mar-27-06  vesivialvy93: i think the best dedicate chess computers of today's can play as good as deep thought (tasc r30 or mephisto atlanta)
Jun-15-08  iccsumant: < Jaymthegenius: In youre profile you say "Kasperov is best of all time!, get over" I disagree, as Kasparov has lost to Karpov, Anand, Ivanchuck, and Kramink in the past. I think it would be better to say Kramnik, Polgar, Karpov, Leko, Svidler, Larsen, Kasparov, Anand, and Ivanchuck are the best of all time, and the fact that Kramnik is world champion but Kasparov is highest rated player proves how flawed the ELO system is.>

Hmmm...you seem like a genius...are you showing off that you just memorized a bunch of leading grandmaster names or a super genius trying to make a conclusion that Kasparov is not the strongest of all time?

Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  JointheArmy: What a beating.
Jul-04-11  SetNoEscapeOn: Chessmaster's introduction to this game:

<The World Champion was invited to New York to face off with the world's leading main-frame computer program in a two-game exhibition at the Marshall Chess Club. The first game was a typical grandmaster crush, as Deep Thought was tied down to defense of the King pawn. In this, the second game, Kasparov opens the game up tactically and shows how a hesitant computer can be hung out to dry.>

Jul-07-12  HeadCrunch: A brilliant work of art by Kasparov against a fumbling Computer.
Jul-07-12  kingfu: Black sacrificed his Queen for positional beauty. Chess Computer programs have come a long way since then.
Jul-07-12  RookFile: Well, the fumbling computer was probably 2500 FIDE. Kasparov just smashed it as he would any other GM that strength, but the rest of us would not have done as well against Deep Thought.
Jul-07-12  Jim Bartle: How would white win after 12...a6?
Dec-16-12  Conrad93: 2500 FIDE. Err... Wrong! Robert Byrne (a brilliant GM) said he had to play the best game in his last ten years in order to defeat Deep Thought.
Dec-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Jim Bartle>
<How would white win after 12...a6?> I wasn't able to find an immediate win either, but White probably continues in gambit style: 12...a6 13. Rg1 Nf6 14. Be2 Bxe2 (looks safest) 15. Kxe2. White has a big lead in development in exchange for a pawn and a shattered kingside.
Jun-14-14  Shams: The two games of this mini-match are the "we'll always have Paris" of man vs machine play.

-----

<SetNoEscapeOn> <Chessmaster's introduction to this game:

<The World Champion was invited to New York to face off with the world's leading main-frame computer program in a two-game exhibition at the Marshall Chess Club. The first game was a typical grandmaster crush, as Deep Thought was tied down to defense of the King pawn.>>

Strange comment given that Deep Thought's king pawn left the board on move 4 in that game:

Deep Thought vs Kasparov, 1989

Jul-15-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zhbugnoimt: I love reading over past comments from years like 2004, where people still thought people could always get engines. The engines have progressed more than us humans in the past 11 years! More correctly, though, the programmers are progressing faster than the chess players.
May-31-17  Xonatron: Zhbugnoimt, I agree. I love these comments now that years have past by!
May-31-17  Xonatron: Stockfish 8 (after 6m20s) finally shows mate in 43 in the final position. It continues to narrow it down. After 9m40s it shows mate in 23. All with 37... Rc5. In years to come, it will be interesting to compare this analysis.
May-31-17  Xonatron: By helping it with moves, I got Stockfish 8 to solve mate in 22 at the end of this game, with 37... Rc2+.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Will humans defeate Artificial Intelligence?
from Man vs. Machine by neverfallen
QGA Central Var. Modern Def (D20) 1-0 A good old fashioned whip
from 7 Comes Before 11 Starting @12:00 FTB's time by fredthebear
Queen's Gambit Accepted - Kasparov Deep Blue
from Favorite games by KFitzgerald
Riesgos en GDA
from Attack with 1 d4 by DIEGOGG
Riesgos en GDA
from Attack with 1 d4 by fredthebear
Kasparov The Killer!!
by chezstartz
Kasparov's brilliant win against Deep Thought
from Kansas Player's Collection of Good Games by Kansas Player
boxing Helena
by lonchaney
woodenbishop's favorite games #2
by woodenbishop
VaselineTopLove's favorite games - part 3
by VaselineTopLove
1989
from Computer - GM games 1963-2002 by biglo
Kasparov DT 1-0 37 drag. BRA!!!!!!!!!!!
from xfer's favorite games 2008 by xfer
Garry Kasparov vs Deep Thought (Computer)
from kasparov and his moves by Durateston


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC