Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Howard Staunton vs NN
"The Big NN of the End" (game of the day Jun-27-2007)
Unknown (1855)
King's Gambit: Accepted. Greco Gambit Calabrese Gambit (C38)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 30 more Staunton/NN games
sac: 10.Ne5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-27-07  mrbiggs: <nyap> 16. Bd6++

I'm a fan of the King's Gambit, and I really liked this game.

Jun-27-07  not yet a patzer: <Thank you, mrbiggs>

Yes, what a King's Gambit; blowing up the King side of the board. The Staunton games are fun because his opponents did not seem to have the pat answers for his openings that players do today. I particularly enjoy his Sicilian games as black and the "primitive" responses of white.

Jun-27-07  sneaky pete: From The Chess-Player's Handbook, 1847, page 251:

14... Ke7

(If he venture 14... Kd8, you play 15.Qxg5 and win; so also, if he move 14... Kf8, you may take the P. with Q.B. (15.Bxf4 ..), leaving your Queen <en prise>, and if he capture either Q. or B., you mate him next move.)

15.Qe2 Bg4

(Should he risk 15... Be6, you would exchange Bishops, then check with your Queen at c4, and afterwards, by playing her to b4, you must gain the advantage.)

16.Qd3 Nbd7
17.Qd4 Nh5

He ought to win.

Would Staunton play this line in 1855, if he knew it was bad and had published the refutation 8 years earlier in what, as Keene writes, "immediately became the standard textbook of English chessplayers"?

Jun-27-07  jkiipli: what happens after 18..Nxc4?
Jun-27-07  geigermuller: <what happens after 18..Nxc4?> I guess 19. Qc7+ is fatal after 18. ... Nxc4.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <TheAlchemist: *** In the 1800s masters often played under such rules, that the opponent had [the privilege] to choose the square the master had to give him mate from (before the game) ***.>

That is a very remarkable condition, of which I had not previously heard. When such a condition was applied, did the master's opponent (presumably the ubiquitous "NN") get to choose any square at all as the required mating square? It occurs to me that if the game came down to an otherwise trivially winning K+P versus lone K ending, the master could only win if the designated square were on the a-, b-, g- or h-file and/or on the 1st, 2nd, 7th or 8th rank. It seems that if any of the 16 squares in the expanded center (c3 by c6 by f6 by f3) were chosen as the required mating square, such a condition could present major (possibly insuperable) difficulties for the master in many otherwise easily won positions.

Jun-27-07  tatarch: Looks like NN had a draw at move 24 with Ke7 instead of Kc7. We should all be grateful to NN for enabling so many 'brilliant' 19th century games for us to enjoy.
Jun-27-07  tatarch: Well, I guess it could get complicated with 25.Qg5+ after 24...Ke7. Black would lose the Knight, and then assuming he could force a trade of queens he would have a rook but be down a couple passed pawns. So I retract my statement, I still think white should win in that line.

What's white's continuation after 24...Kc5? I assume there's a mating pattern that must follow...

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The position after move eight is comical:White has three pieces developed and black has zero. Even at this point,NN deservs to be nameless.
Jun-27-07  twin phoenix: gotta Love the kings gambit! but the truly fantastic move (at least to me) is 15. BxF4!! smashing all resistance. hope i get to play that move someday! this is the era of chess i love. sack everything and mate the king. wish i could play like that but unfortunately when i'm playing well i am entirely too stoic, just finding my opponents mistakes not forcing his capitulation as here. Judging from this game Staunton deserves to have the pieces named after him!
Jun-27-07  eaglewing: <tatarch: What's white's continuation after 24...Kc5? > Good question! I wonder, too.

I see chasing like 24...Kc5 25 Na4+ Kxc4 26 b3+ Kb4 27 c3+ Ka5 but now? Nearly mate is not enough. Someone cares to enlighten us?

Jun-27-07  soughzin: On the game posted I don't see how white has enough after 10.0-0 Kg8. White is ahead in development but the black king is off the f file and white has no way to control the a2-g7 diagonal. What did you have in mind here?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessmensch: The same day this appeared as GOTD Chessbase posted the following page: It discusses the Fedorov-Kasparov Corus game in 2001: Fedorov vs Kasparov, 2001. Now, that's chess! Compare it to this merry-go-round.
Jun-27-07  OBIT: Oh, stop making excuses for the master. No doubt he saw 29. b3+ is a mate in 3 with Black's moves all forced, so he didn't look for anything else.
Jun-27-07  Crowaholic: <not yet a patzer: Can someone please tell me why 15..Ke7? Why not 15..Nxh5!>

Because of 16. Bd6 checkmate. This was already mentioned, but I want to point out that this is the key to understanding why 14. ..Ke7! is so much better than ..Kf8? - Kf8 gives White a tempo to play 15. Bxg4! and Black can take neither bishop nor queen or else the other piece delivers mate on the a3-f8 diagonal. But after

14. ..Ke7! 15. Bxg4?? Nxh5, the g4 bishop cannot checkmate, and the queen is lost for nothing. So White must retreat the queen and has insufficient compensation for the sacrificed knight.

By the way, according to the Spike engine, a much better choice than 17. Rd1 would have been 17. Qh4 (+6.08 @ 14 ply vs. only +0.76 @ 14 ply after 17. Rd1 Ne5 18. Qh2 Nxc4, instead of the move played in the game, with the main line 19. Qc7+ Bd7 20. Qxd7+ Kf8 21. Qxb7 etc.).

Another mistake seems to have been 23. Qg7+ where Black could ostensibly have won with sharp play after 23. ..Kd6 24. Qh6+ Kc5!.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Neddy: A tremendous game!
But I think white made an error on move 25...Nd7.
I think if 25...Bd7, and then 26Qxe5+
this allows 26...Kc8 and black would
achieve equality.
Jun-29-07  execve: Why not 9. Bg4
Oct-05-07  nimh: Rybka 2.4 mp, AMD X2 2.01GHz, 10 min per move, threshold 0.25.

Staunton 8 mistakes:
6.hxg5 -1.01 (6.Nc3 -0.54)
10.Ne5 -1.66 (10.e5 -0.12)
13.e6 -2.28 (13.Bd2 -1.54)
14.exf7+ -3.05 (14.Qxf7+ -2.18)
17.Rd1 0.51 (17.Qh4 4.98)
18.Qh2 0.00 (18.f8Q+ 0.52)
21.Rd8+ 0.17 (21.Bxg8 1.67)
23.Qg7+ -3.71 (23.Qg5+ 0.22)

NN 6 mistakes:
9...c6 -0.12 (9...Nc6 -1.04)
14...Kf8 4.73 (14...Ke7 -3.05)
18...Qxg5 1.64 (18...Nxc4 0.00)
24...Kc7 -0.40 (24...Kc5 -3.77)
25...Nd7 0.00 (25...Qd7 -0.43)
26...Kb6 #3 (26...Ne5 0.00)

Premium Chessgames Member
  amadeus: Entertaining game, even if you are not an NN fan :)

Staunton's annotations, otoh, are quite poor. From the Chess-Player's Handbook:

On 17.Rd1: "Better, as the afterplay shows, than castling".

And the complete explanation, after 18...Qxg5: "If White had castled in the previous move, this Bishop would have been taken with a check."

<Staunton> -1

Apr-24-09  WhiteRook48: 26...Ne5 was better
Dec-05-10  Tigranny: Any reason why NN didn't capture the queen on move 15?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sastre: If 15...Nxh5 then 16.Bd6#.
Feb-02-13  Cemoblanca: NN, or The Boy Who Wouldn't Grow Up! :D
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheTamale: A rock-'em-sock-'em game, lots of fun. It's interesting to see <nimh's> post above, giving the Rybka assessment. To me it looks as if Staunton has NN on the ropes for most of the game, but according to Rybka, Staunton is blundering at a greater rate than NN!

Oh well, there's always blunder severity to consider. And, as Tartakower used to say, the game is won by the player who makes the next to last mistake.

Sep-21-15  The Kings Domain: It's as if black allowed himself to lose. Love the hunt for black's king across the board. Impressive win by Staunton.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
KGA Greco Gambit Calabrese Gambit (C38) 1-0 King walk
from NN Needs Fredthe... Reinfeld, Chernev, Horowitz, by fredthebear
A rock-'em-sock-'em game, lots of fun! Deluxe decoy sacrifices!
from yFredthebear's Pawn Trimmers and Mowers by fredthebear
A brilliant King's gambit and a King hunt(GOTD)..
from Collections in Idleness 2 by kishchess
Tactical melee by Staunton in KG
from attacking lessons by prashla
Inspired play from one of the grand old men of chess!
from Entertaining Favorites by Whitehat1963
Staunton smoking out Blacks King
from The King-Hunt by greatdane
A brilliant King's gambit and a King hunt(GOTD)..
from Collections in Idleness 2 by Trigonometrist
A rock-'em-sock-'em game, lots of fun! Deluxe decoy sacrifices!
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by trh6upsz
10.Ne5!! This game is a BLAST!!
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by Del ToRo
Chess Prehistory
by Joe Stanley
Tactical melee by Staunton in KG
from attacking lessons by isfsam
assorted Good games
by rbaglini
Destruction sacrifices
by outplayer
positional sacrifices
by zatara
June 27: The Big NN of the End
from Game of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
27.6% - 21.4%
from Blunderchecked games I by nimh

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC