Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs NN
Simul, 28b (1903) (exhibition), Manchester ENG, Dec-10
King's Gambit: General (C30)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 88 times; par: 32 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 47 more Lasker/NN games
+ sac: 9.Nxd4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-31-03  skakmiv: What a game!
Mar-31-03  GregorMendel: Whoa on earth could Lasker have calculated the Queen and Knight sacrifice? That's amazing!
Mar-31-03  ughaibu: Do you think he did calculate it? I would guess that it was intuitive. I dont see how he could win if black plays 16....Bh5?
Apr-01-03  crafty: 16. ... ♗h5 17. g4 ♗xg4 18. ♗e3 dxe3 19. d4+ ♔xe4 20. ♘f6+ =   (eval 0.00; depth 12 ply; 500M nodes)
Apr-01-03  ughaibu: I rather suspect that this was a miscalculation, that Lasker forgot that capturing the knight would remove black's pawn from e5 and allow the king to escape there. Presumably it was played in a simul(?)
Oct-13-03  Bears092: 16... Be2
Oct-13-03  ughaibu: If 16.....Be2 how about 17.h4?
Oct-14-03  Cyphelium: 16. -Be2 17. h4 Bxf1 18. hxg5 Bxd3! 19. Bf4+ Kxe4 and now 20. Re1+ Kxf5 certainly lose but 21. Ne7+ d5 22. Re1+ Be2 23. Rxe2+ Kd3 is interesting. I've only given this a brief look, but I fail to see anything for white. Perhaps there is something, either now or later?
Oct-14-03  ughaibu: Cyphelium: After 18....Bd3 how about Nf6?
Oct-14-03  doreshk: something similar to
Zukertort vs NN, 1877
Oct-14-03  tricloc: CM8000 gives 16...Be2 as solidly winning for black (-5.59).
Oct-15-03  Cyphelium: ughaibu> I'll just let that bishop take care of everything as usual: (16. Be2 17. h4 Bxf1 18. hxg5 Bxd3) 19. Nf6 Bxe4 and black seems to escape, for instance 20. Bf4+ Kxf5 or 20. Bxe4 Nxf6.
Nov-02-03  ughaibu: Cyphelium: In your lines the weakness of d3 is conspicuous so how about 16.h4 instead of c3?
Nov-02-03  Cyphelium: ughaibu> It's interesting. I think white has a draw.

16. h4 Bxc2 17. hxg5 Bxd3 18. Bf4+ Kxe4 19. Ne7+ (covering f5, 19. Nf6++ Kxf5 20. Bd2+ (20. Bxd6+ Ke6) Kg6 is not convincing) 19.- d5 20. Rae1+ Be2 21. Rxe2+ Kd3 22. Rd2+ Kc4 23. Rc2+

and now 23.- Kb4 loses, for example 24. Bd2+ Ka4 25. Nxd5 (threatening 26. b3+ Ka3 27. Bb4 mate or if 25.- a5 26. b3+ Ka3 27. Bc1 mate)25. -Qxd5 26. Bxd5 threatening mate on b3 and if 26.- b4 then 27. gxh6 wins a piece.

So black must play 23.- Kd3 and then white can take the perpetual, but that seems to be all.

Nov-02-03  totoma: Very interesting game by Lasker, he began to attack as seldom he did
Apr-06-04  nikolaas: It seems to me that after 16....♗h5 white draws:
17.♗e3 dxe3 18.d4+ ♔xe4 19.♘f6+ ♔d3 20.♗e4+ ♔c4 21.♗d5+
Oct-16-04  Apocalypse79: Black has made a blunder.. g5pawn was last defence line.
Jan-09-05  oxxo: a highly dubious win there by Lasker.. for my liking.. That's why we don't have a record of him launching an attack like this on Steinitz and such, I guess.
Feb-28-08  stupidiot21: wow just wow
Feb-28-08  brankat: <that's why we don't have a record of him launching an attack like this on Steinitz and such, I guess.>

You don't play like this against Steinitz and such. But it's done in simuls regularly. Dr.Lasker knew full well what he was doing.

May-28-08  JG27Pyth: One imagines NN here as a local bloke, a Red Devils supporter naturally, just off work he's wearing his greasy mechanic's overalls, has a pint in hand as he plays, and with each unlikely move Lasker makes he mutters with increasing dismay... "Wot's this!? izzee off 'is cholla?"

If you aren't familiar with the charming local dialect/accent known as Mancunian, do give a listen...

This is a bbc link to "speak Mancunian in 10 minutes" (it's really under 2 minutes long.)

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <oxxo: a highly dubious win there by Lasker.. for my liking.. That's why we don't have a record of him launching an attack like this on Steinitz and such, I guess.>

Not exactly like this, no. But he did manage some very attractive combinations against Steinitz.

Lasker vs Steinitz, 1895

Steinitz vs Lasker, 1899

Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: What was the point of 16...g4 ? Black must have realized that there was a threat of mate on f4, or he wouldn't have played 15...Bh3. (He would have done something like move his ♖ on a1, which is en prise, or else played Be2.) But no, he went and removed the ♙ defending f4.
Sep-16-09  WhiteRook48: NN keeps getting bashed by queen sacs
Nov-27-14  TheFocus: From a simul in Manchester, England on December 10, 1903.

Lasker scored +17=10-1.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
poodle's favorite games
by poodle
queen sacrifice
by dippel
Mitz Moshe's favorite games
by Mitz Moshe
thesonicvision's favorite short games
by thesonicvision
pixing's favorite games
by pixing
Games that are fun to analyse.
by Cyphelium
World Champions
by clifton
Lasker brilliancy
from Learning collection by prashla
by lonchaney
queen sack
from shr0pshire's favorite games by shr0pshire
Lasker gives up Queen and Knight.
from EVERYONE loves the King's Gambit by Backward Development
easy win + others
by hartkoka
Game collection: M
by zentovic
from chess strategems vii - under construction by gauer
Lasker Rush
from Isamaru's favorite games by Isamaru
2...d6 3....nc6 unusual sac game study the mate!
from KGD- Different Lines by takattack
NN's worst defeats
by Sibahi
imag's favorite games
by imag
chillosoph's favorite games
by chillosoph
from lasker best games by brager
plus 53 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC