chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Rudolf Spielmann vs Siegbert Tarrasch
Maehrisch-Ostrau (1923), Ostrava CSR, rd 11, Jul-14
King's Gambit: Falkbeer Countergambit. Charousek Gambit Main Line (C32)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 49 times; par: 30 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Spielmann/Tarrasch games
sac: 8...O-O PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-15-04  morphy234: 25. ... GxF6

great opening of a file, and wins!

Sep-15-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  meloncio: And before, 8. ... 0-0!! A classical sacrifice for development.
Sep-26-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: You know, after 12.Bxh1, it looked to me that *both* players were losing!
Feb-28-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: The Handbuch of those days had it that 7....Bf5 was bad because of 8. g4.

So much for another footnote !

Jan-03-06  Frankly: Courageous 8th move by Tarrasch seems to be the last word on the subject, according to Batsford's Modern Chess Openings.
Mar-23-07  Dr. Siggy: Tarrasch's 8... 0-0!!! is one of the most amazing sacrifices I've ever seen in my patzer's life! Was it the result of his previous homework or just made by him over the board? Who knows? At first sight, it seems it was the former; but, judging for what we can read in Tarrasch's everlasting classic "The Game of Chees" (for instance, about the Center Game), the latter is not impossible at all!...

After this crushing game, no one else ventured to play 8. g4? ever again. It has been replaced by 8. Nc3 Qe7 9. Be3, which is a bit of a tough nut to crack. Masters of Kasparov's stature even go to the point of claiming that White always gets the better of it, a statement which I find very hard to agree with.

Allow me to prove my point by showing you another very lengthy analysis I've made with "Fritz 5.32" help: - 9...Bxe3 10. Qxe3 Nxc3! 11. Qxe7+ Kxe7 12. bxc3, and now:

(I) 12... Be4(?!) (as usually recommended by "Lady Theory") doesn't seem to be good enough for Black to achieve full equality: after 13. c4 Bxf3 (splitting White's pawns, but...) 14. gxf3 Nd7 15. Kd2 Kd6 16. Bd3 g6(?!) ("Fritz 5.32" choice!...) 17. f5! Rhe8 18. Rab1 b6 19. h4! Nf6 20. Rhe1 c6 21. dxc6 Kxc6 22. Kc3 Rad8 23. f4! Kd6 24. a4! Rxe1 25. Rxe1 Re8 26. Rxe8 Nxe8 27. fxg6 fxg6 28. f5! gxf5 29. Bxf5 h6 30. Kd4 Nf6 31. Bh3!, the truth is that White reaches a Bishop vs. Knight ending with a clear (albeit small) plus;

(II) 12... Bxc2(!?) (recommended many years ago by Pachman) seems to be a much, much better option for Black: in fact, after 13. Kd2 Ba4! 14. Rb1 Nd7! 15. Bd3 Nc5 16. Rhe1+ Kf8! 17. Bb5 Bxb5 18. Rxb5 b6 19. Nd4 Re8 20. Rbb1 a6! 21. Nb3 Nxb3+! 22. axb3 a5! 23. Kd3 h5! 24. Kd4 Rh6! 25. Rbd1 Rg6 26. Rxe8+ Kxe8 27. g3 h4!, Black gets a Rook ending which is (at the very least) drawn.

Mar-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: < Dr. Siggy > I had not seen this game before. As you do, I have great admiration for Tarrasch: Praeceptor Germaniae et Praeceptor Mundi. Certainly an all time great chess player even if never world champion. Along with a modern "The Game of Chess" I have a magnificent edition of "Dreihundert Schach Partien" published in 1928, certainly one of the best pieces among my chess books. Paul Albert
Mar-27-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Dr Siggy> 13....Ba4 may well be an improvement over the following game: http://chessgames.com/perl/chessgam...
May-30-08  sneaky pete: Spielmann in Kagans Neueste Schachnachrichten:

7... Lc8-f5!
Das ist die hochbedeutsame Neuerung. Bis dahin berücksichtigte man nur 7... Lf2+ 8.Kd1 Dxd5+ (wiederum der vorzeitige Rückgewinn des Bauern) 9.Sfd2!, was freilich für Weiß günstig aussieht. Wie schwer übrigens die Idee von 7... Lf5 zu erkennen ist, geht daraus hervor, das Bilguers Handbuch diesen Zug als fehlerhaft wegen des figurengewinnes 8.g4 .. bezeichnet. Ich zog auch

8.g2-g4? ..
nicht aus Habsucht, sondern weil ich fürchtete, sonst in Positionsnachteil zu kommen. Nach 8.Sc3 De7 9.Le3 Lxe3 (9... Sxc3 10.Lxc5 ..) 10.Dxe3 Sxc3 11.Dxe7+ Kxe7 12.bxc Le4! gewinnt Schwarz entweder den Bauern d5 oder zerreißt mittels .. Lxf3 gxf3 .. auch noch die Bauern des weißen Königsflügels und bringt seinen Springer später nach c5. In beiden Fällen behält Schwarz das bessere Endspiel, was freilich das kleinere Uebel gewesen wäre, denn nun bricht mein Spiel überraschend schnell zusammen.

Dr. Tarrasch gewann in glänzendem Angriffsstil und erhielt mit Recht einen Schönheitspreis. Auch der Ausgang dieser Partie entmutigte mich. Vielleicht hätte ich mit 8.Sc3 .. statt 8.g4 .. mit Mühe und Not Remis erreichen können, aber man spielt doch nicht Königsgambit, um schließlich in ein schlecht stehendes Endspiel einzulenken. Das überhaupt ein so verstecktes Figurenopfer möglich gewesen ist, beweist, daß die Anlage der weißen Partie unmöglich gesund sein kann. "Ich lasse mit mir nicht Schindluder treiben", sagte Dr. Tarrasch nach Beendigung der Partie. Ein hartes Wort eines Artzes! Das Königsgambit ist krank, schwerkrank!

Oct-08-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Though <Emanuel Lasker> won this tournament, <Tarrasch> garnered the brilliancy prize for this game.

<Spielmann>, the "Last Knight of the King's Gambit," was so stunned by the result that he wrote a sardonic article entitled "At the Head of the King's Gambit, the Sickness Unto Death."

Jun-22-14  King.Arthur.Brazil: By this time Tarrasch is aged 61. It is rare to mantain such kind of beautiful chess, including tatics, by this age. Fantastic black game!
Mar-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Alex Schindler: Wow, 8...0-0 has some characteristics of aggressive king's gambit play for *white*, but it still comes as a bolt from the blue. Reminds me of the Muzio Gambit and other positions that trade a minor piece for pressure down the F file -- here, though, the sacrifice doesn't actually open up the rook's file, or assemble a battery-- rather, it dares white to spend a tempo taking the the piece and allowing deadly pressure down the e-file instead.

It's easy to regain most of the sacrificed material with a double attack on the queen and rook (Nf2, discovering a rook attack on the queen and making deadly use of the lovely c5 bishop), but the wonderful thing about this sac is that even after winning the exchange on h1 to partially equalize material, the attack continues with devasting force.

Jun-15-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  dernier loup de T: Rien que cette seule partie extraordinaire justifie que Tarrasch a continué à jouer après 1914... On a longtemps parlé à propos d'elle d'une réfutation décisive du gambit du roi, tellement la contre-attaque du docteur est fulgurante et percutante.
Jun-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <dernier loup de T: Rien que cette seule partie extraordinaire justifie que Tarrasch a continué à jouer après 1914... On a longtemps parlé à propos d'elle d'une réfutation décisive du gambit du roi, tellement la contre-attaque du docteur est fulgurante et percutante.>

Agreed. My own belief is that White only gets a good game in the King's Gambit if he gives up a piece very early, normally by ♗ or ♘xf7.

If Black can castle he stands much better.

Here Tarrasch plays with tremendous éclat and his opponent is poleaxed.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Gambits (good position vs material superiority).
from Opening themes. by jpetersen46321
Game 52
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by isfsam
Siegbert Tarrasch's Best Games
by KingG
Chapter 7: King's Gambit Game 16
from Chess Openings: T&P, Section 1 by Infohunter by fredthebear
Game 52
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by AdrianP
lazintata's misc
by lazintata
King's gambit, Falkbeer countergambit
from Skandinavn / Chigorn for Black Compiled by katar by fredthebear
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 52
from Garry Kasparov on My Great Predecessors Part 1 by MetalPlastic
Game 52
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Falkbeer A with sac of bishop Tarrash !!!!!!
from What the Falkbeer Act BLACK WIN by Acephalic
Game 52
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by demirchess
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Contribution to opening theory
from Les Prix de Beauté aux Echecs (II) by Sleeping kitten
Mährisch-Ostrau 1923
by suenteus po 147
Game 52
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Wrong Way!
by darkjuva
Game 52
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC