Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mark Hebden vs John Nunn
London m/1 (1979)
King's Gambit: Accepted. Abbazia Defense (C36)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Hebden/Nunn games
sac: 24...Rb3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-02-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: Nice smothered mate threat by Nunn.
Jan-02-06  Holden: There's no stopping the smothered mate.

<Sneaky> should have this game in his "crazy rooks" collection. 24...Rb3! 0-1

Jan-02-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: The position after 18.Rxa7 is quite entertaining,just look how many pins there are! all centered around the Knight on c7,a real tense position.
Jan-02-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: The exchange sac 23...Rxf3!! leads to a winning position,no matter what white does.
Jan-02-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: In fact I'm giving 24...Rb3!! This game is a forgotten brilliancy.
Jan-03-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: See J Kinlay vs Nunn, 1977 another brilliancy by Nunn with the Abbazia defense.
Jan-06-06  Castle In The Sky: Nunn ends the game with a nice example of the "windmill."
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The Abbazia Defence, the Windmill and the Stoke-Adams Attack.
Jan-06-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: I guess its not a forced smothered mate,so windmill is the best definition of the ending.
Feb-14-06  MorphyMatt: <Timothy Glenn Forney> Not a forced mate? not 27. ♔g1 ♘h3++ 28. ♔h1 ♕g1+! 29. ♖xg1 ♘f2#?
Feb-14-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: Its not a forced 'smothered' mate,the King can go to f1 then mate,follows,so technically its not a smothered mate.Its a windmill as <Castle In The Sky> points out.If you look at my first kibitz I said that.
Feb-15-06  notyetagm: <MorphyMatt> I agree with you: this is a forced smothered mate. It is in fact called <Philidor's Legacy>.

The variation with ♔f1 ♕f2# is almost always part of this mating pattern. This threat is what forces the White king to go into the h1-corner from where he is then dragged out by the knight check on f2 to face the dreaded ... ♘h3++ double check.

Feb-15-06  notyetagm: 24 ... ♖b3!, attacking the White b6-queen defender to <REMOVE THE GUARD> of the critical d4-square.

If the d4-square (not the d4-pawn!) falls to the Black d7-queen, then Nunn will be able to play the standard Philidor's Legacy smothered mate: ... ♕d4+, ... ♘f2+, ... ♘h3++, ... ♕g1+, ... ♘f2#.

So Nunn attacks the defender (White b6-queen) with a non-attacker (Black f3-rook) from a square not in the defensive complex (b3-square) and dominates the defending queen, controlling all of the squares that the White queen needs to occupy in order to defend the d4-checking/mating focal point: b4, b6, c5, and d6.

White chooses to meet the threat to his queen by <CAPTURING> the attacking rook (25 ♕x♖) but this allows the smothered mate discussed previously.

Feb-15-06  notyetagm: The more I think about it the more I realize that the ending combination is clearly not a windmill. One discovered check does not a windmill make.

<A windmill is a series of discovered checks.> For example, see the incredible windmill played by Torre against Emmanuel Lasker(!) in Carlos Torre vs Lasker, 1925. In that game the windmill consists of the <series> of discovered checks 27 ♖g7xf7+, 29 ♖g7xb7+, and 31 ♖g7-g5+, each of these rook moves being a discovered check of the Black h8-king by the White f6-bishop.

Feb-15-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: <notyetagm> What you are calling a "windmill" I call a "see-saw",a windmill is done with a ♗ and ♘.A see-saw check is with the ♗ and ♖.As in--A Kupferstich vs J Andreassen, 1953 This famous game is an example of a windmill--D Byrne vs Fischer, 1956 In the Nunn game it is not forced the ♔ can go to f1,stopping the smothered mate to just a normal mate with ♘ and a ♔.
Feb-15-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: The person who really deserves the smothered mate named after him is Greco, since he had the first documented game with one.
May-08-07  twin phoenix: i don't understand why white doesn't try to win the exchange on move 17 Nxa8? what am i missing?
May-31-07  Timothy Glenn Forney: You are right 17.Nxa8 is winning.
Sep-28-08  smocard: What about Nxe6?
Nxe6 Qxe6 Ng5 Bxg5 Bd6 (or Bxg5 if you wish) etc.
Nxe6 fxe6 Bxc4 Rxf4 Ne5 etc.
Sep-28-08  smocard: Oops, forgot to mention...
Nxe6 fxe6 Bxc4 Nxc4 Ng5
Nov-19-09  Smothered Mate: too bad...

Hebden resigned instead of letting me happen.

Sep-05-14  Christoforus Polacco: <Timothy Glenn Forney> In your absurdity definition ''the smothered mate'' not exist at all :)) But maybe you are right :) It's not forced mate ... because Hebden resigned before checkmate :)

The smothered mate idea is that the player is not a suicide and don't want to make ritual Japanese harakiri (seppuku) :)

The most interesting move in this spectacular game in ''good, old style'' is 21.... Kh8 :) Anticipation for weakness of center ?

Sep-05-14  hcgflynn: I thought white is winning after 21. - Kh8.

22. Ng5 or 22. Ne5 seems good. (Or else I'm blind.)

Nov-07-14  Christoforus Polacco: <hcgflynn>
Probably 21....Kh8 it was very psychological move :) Nunn gave his opponent the chance to make error ... :)
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
from:Brutal Attacking Chess by Timothy Glenn Forney
from Collection of Collections- Tactics by takchess
KGA. Abbazia Defense (C36) 0-1 Nh3+ leads to Philidor's Legacy
from yKnights Add Spice I Gives Fredthebear Heartburn by fredthebear
KGA. Abbazia Defense (C36) 0-1 Philidor's Legacy is coming!
from Black Attacks f2 Annoyed Fredthebear ECO B, C by fredthebear
Smothered Mate? see my kibitz.
from Brutal Attacking Chess by Timothy Glenn Forney
from Gambit Grimoire by Timothy Glenn Forney
Game 195
from Understanding Chess Middlegames (Nunn) by isfsam
24 ... Rb3! attacking the White b6-queen defender of d4
KGA. Abbazia Defense (C36) 0-1 Nh3+ leads to Philidor's Legacy
from Attacks a2/a7, b2/b7 and c2/c7 ECO C by FTB by Del ToRo
24 ... Rb3! attacking the White b6-queen defender of d4
Game 195
from Understanding Chess Middlegames (Nunn) by edwin.n.walker
Philidor's Legacy
by sneaky pete
ervindr's Favorit 2
by ervindr
King's Gambit Accepted, Abbazia Defense
from KING'S GAMBIT MODERN (... d5 : Falkbeer, Abazzia by gambitfan
Not a Pierce - but a good choice for black
from Pierce Gambit by Ybrevo

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC