chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Miguel Najdorf vs Alexander Kotov
Saltsj÷baden Interzonal (1948), Stockholm SWE, rd 4, Jul-20
Neo-GrŘnfeld Defense: Delayed Exchange Variation (D74)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Najdorf/Kotov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-22-05  aragorn69: 51.g5?? appears to be one of the worst mistakes made by a top-grandmaster in a basic ending.
Jan-27-06  Addicted73: Candidate in front. f4,g4 followed by f5 simply win.
Jan-14-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Gideon Stňhlberg's tournament book has this ending (after 70...Ke7):

71.Ke5 Kf7 72.h5 h6 73.g6+ Kg8 Remis.

May-09-14  kereru: 51.g5 wasn't the best but the real blunder was 55.Ke4?? Giving away the 5th rank and the opposition is incomprehensible.

White could still have won after 51.g5, e.g. 52.f4 Kf7 53.Kd6 Ke8 54.Ke6 Kf8 55.Kf6 Kg8 56.Ke7 Kg7 57.h4 Kg8 58.h5! etc.

Jul-08-14  kereru: I take that back, the game was still winnable after 55.Ke4?, which still deserves a question mark.

After this the win depended on using the tempo correctly with the h-pawn. 65.h3?? was the move which finally gave the win away, 65.h4 still works.

Jul-08-14  Poulsen: <kereru><65.h3?? was the move which finally gave the win away, 65.h4 still works.>

All can be checked in endgame databases. I have not checked, but you might be right.

Never the less I think that <Addicted73> is right about <Candidate in front>. It's a simple rule - easy to remember - even under timepressure - and it works in most cases in pure pawn endgames.

However here it will properly require some precision. If both g-pawns are gone, white must off course not give his f-pawn to win the black h-pawn, if black can control h8 or gain sideopposition.

Jul-10-14  kereru: Would need the 7-man tablebases on the supercomputer at Lomonosov University for that...

But anyway they had it all worked out before engines and tablebases. Page 42 of Euwe & Hopper's "Guide to Chess Endings":

http://books.google.com/books?id=WY...

Oct-03-17  erony: I agree with kereru (also Euwe & Hopper !) except on one point : 51 g5 is not inferior to 51 f4, it would even be the only plan if the white Rook-pawn had already moved !
Oct-04-17  Straclonoor: First of all - after 7-pieces position appears (48.Kxd4) on the board white win.

Here is variation from Lomonosov TB7

48... Kf8 49. Ke5 Kf7 50. f3 h6 51. f4 h5 52. h4 Ke7 53. f5 gxf5 54. Kxf5 Kd7 55. Kg5 Ke7 56. Kxh5 Kf7 57. g4 Ke7 58. g5 Kf7 59. g6+ Kf6 60. Kh6 Ke6 61. g7 Kd6 62. g8=Q Kc6 63. Qg5 Kb6 64. h5 Ka6 65. Qc5 Kb7 66. Kg6 Kb8 67. Qe7 Ka8 68. h6 Kb8 69. h7 Ka8 70. h8=Q#

Second - <65.h3?? was the move which finally gave the win away, 65.h4 still works.>

Yes, but not 65.h4 only wins (in 28 moves) - Kd4, d3, e3, f3 also wins in 30-32 moves.

Oct-05-17  erony: In pratical terms, ...h6 is very bad. The only chance is to keep this pawn in h7, like "every russian school-boy knows" and what Kotov did.

The other moves than 65 h4! are only waste of time and have no interest at all. What is crucial is the reciprocal zugzwang Ke4, Pf4,g5,h4 / Kd6, Pg6,h7.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
3p vs 2p
from Endgames Kibitzed by FENfiend
Endgames in progress
by FENfiend
1948 Saltsj÷baden interzonal
by jww
Saltsj÷baden Interzonal 1948
by Tabanus
3:2||
from 29p_PAWN endgames by whiteshark
3:2||
from 29p_PAWN endgames by Patca63


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC