chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Gyula Sax vs Ljubomir Ljubojevic
"Sacs and Violence" (game of the day Sep-18-2009)
Phillips & Drew Kings (1980), London ENG, rd 4, Apr-13
Sicilian Defense: French. Alapin Variation Haag Attack (B40)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Sax/Ljubojevic games
sac: 15...Ncxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-18-09  think: Wow. Horrible opening choice by White. 5. Bd3 without Bc2 later dooms his DSB for the rest of the game. Moving his Queen to e2 and then e4 with no benefit? 12. Rd1? What happened here?
Sep-18-09  squlpt: Lol. Good game, and like the pun
Sep-18-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  sfm: With 14.-,hxg4! Black seems to have a won game, so 14.g4 could be the decisive mistake. After 15.h5 White must have expected only 15.-,Nf8. With 15.-,Ncxe5!! black demonstrates the weakness in White's position. Lovely ending move, bringing Bc8 into the game with more threats than White can handle.
Sep-18-09  Starf1re: I love chessgames.com but the games of the day have been awful all week. Why make a blunderfest GOTD?
Sep-18-09  Starf1re: Ugh I will try to provide a little insight into this monstrosity by highlighting the major mistakes.

5) d3 ???
better was b5+ or c4

8) Qe4 ??
better still b5

12) rd1 ???
Engine prefers re1 evaluating e1 approximately equal, rd1 about -1

13) h4 ???
13) ...h5 ??
Engine strongly prefers cxe4, initiating the attack

14) g4 ????

18) qf1 ?????? dropping a piece, from -3 to -7 eval. 18) ...b5?? Stronger was the immediate qxe5!

Sep-18-09  Olavi: The score is wrong. It must be 12.Re1, of course, as given everywhere else.
Sep-18-09  Garech: Yes, it is 12. Re1 - a gret game from Ljubojevic; I have made a youtube video about it using Fritz for analysis, if you are interested please check out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-cH...

thanks!

Sep-18-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Thanks for the video, <Garech>. I really enjoyed watching it. :D
Sep-18-09  gilbav: It's my pun
Sep-18-09  gilbav: I love this game.
Sep-18-09  JohnBoy: Sorry <Starf1re> - this is a really fun game. Two true brawlers going at it. Sax tries to knock Ljubo off the board from move 1. L watches S swinging wildly, slaps the h5 thrust aside, and butchers his opponent.

As a martial artist, I can appreciate this. It is easy to panic or get flustered with someone coming at my face.

In pre-engine days, lots of lines were played that are now seen to be of questionable soundness. The idea was often to get the opponent off balance, rather than to play a perfect chess game.

CG needs to correct the score!

Sep-18-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I guess it's the pun and not the game that becomes the GOTD-in which case why not call it the POTD?
Sep-18-09  Funicular: I loved the pun. To reply to starf1re, i'll just quote some people

"Starf1re: I love chessgames.com but the games of the day have been awful all week. Why make a blunderfest GOTD?"

“Chess is a fairy tale of 1001 blunders [...] The blunders are all there on the board, waiting to be made”

(Savielly Tartakower)

“Without error there can be no brilliancy”
(Emanuel Lasker)

“What would Chess be without silly mistakes?”
(Kurt Richter)

Even though a game might be highly flawed, its always lovely to see how mistakes are punished. When you see stuff like b5, I think you can´t do nothing but smile. I know because i smiled when i saw it and im sure so many others did as well

Its just my opinion

Cheers from buenos aires

Sep-18-09  WhiteRook48: actually more like 8 million blunders
Sep-18-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: There's nothing much wrong with 5.Bd3 -- the Canadian-Scottish-Israeli IM Danny Kopec used to prefer move orders like 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bd3 -- which was good for shock value, at least. But his basic idea was to build up a structure similar to the King's Indian attack, but with c3 and Bd3-c2 instead of g3 and Bg2.

White lost this one a little later on, though the Kopec system is always vulnerable to forceful play by black.

Sep-18-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: <gilbav: It's my pun> It certainly is and thanks for it. It's a good example of the rare triple pun.

For those who don't know, you can submit ideas for the Game of the Day (with accompanying pun) here: Pun Submission Page

You can vote on current pun ideas here: Pun Voting Booth

May the best pun win, as did today. Thank you.

Sep-18-09  Jim Bartle: Talking Heads did a song with a very similar title: "Sax and Violins."
Sep-18-09  Starf1re: Earlier comments were wrong, scorecard has been corrected, please ignore. Good game better pun.
Sep-18-09  zdigyigy: GM Sax could probably simul the whole lot of us and not drop a point....
Sep-18-09  newzild: Like <Funicular>, I also smiled when I saw 18...b5 - but unlike <sfm>, not because it activates the Bc8. I smiled because of the threat 19...Bf6 or 19...Bd6, winning a piece.
Sep-18-09  TheBish: <Jim Bartle: Talking Head did a song with a very similar title: "Sax and Violins.">

Jim, you stole my thunder! I didn't know there was a song title with that name, but I'm not surprised. I was just going to suggest, an even better title would be "Sax and Violins."

Nov-30-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: As to the move order used by Sax, the true Kopec system (as noted by Domdaniel and practised by Kopec since at least the mid 1970s) is probably safer than what went in this game.

White can get himself into a world of hurt if he plays to 'win' a pawn with 5.cxd4 cxd4 6.Qa4+ Nc6 7.Bb5 Bd7 8.Bxc6 Bxc6 9.Qxd4, leaving his opponent the happy choice of 9....Qxd4 or 9....Bxf3. Opening Explorer

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 65
from Chess Title Contenders (Kopec/Pritchett) by Qindarka
71 of 200 Modern Brilliancies (1984) by Kevin Wicker
from Fredthebear labeled 125 Minis & 300 Destruktors by fredthebear
September 18: Sacs and Violence
from Game of the Day 2009 by Phony Benoni
Phillips & Drew Kings 1980
by Tabanus
71
from 200 Modern Brilliancies (Wicker) by fredthebear
Games to analyse
by SwitchingQuylthulg
Grandmaster Secrets: Winning Quickly at Chess 1
by Sonny Rollins
Games to analyse
by Jaredfchess
Round Four, Game #23
from London Phillips & Drew 1980 by suenteus po 147
71
from 200 Modern Brilliancies (Wicker) by Chessdreamer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC