Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Cohn vs Geza Maroczy
London (1899), London ENG, rd 5, Jun-05
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense. Rio de Janeiro Variation (C67)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 2 more W Cohn/Maroczy games
sac: 24...Rxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: A fine comeback win for Maroczy. The commentary on this game in the Tournament Book, however, is little short of pathetic.

Maroczy played the Berlin Defense to Cohn's Ruy Lopez, and got much the worst of the opening. With his unfortunate 15...Bb4 (15...Rf8 was best), Marozcy was in trouble. Cohn's clever 16. Ne4 was a fine exchange sacrifice which Maroczy wisely declined (if 16...BxR 17. Bf5 would be powerful for White), but he was nonetheless probably lost after 17...Be7 (he might have tried 17...Qe8).

However, after achieving a won game through fine play, Cohn began seeing ghosts and playing tentatively. He engaged in a long misguided effort to win Maroczy's pawn at a7 with 18. Be3 (18. Qe3 or 18. BxB would both have maintained his edge). He followed this up another poor move (21. c4 instead of 21. Nc5) and the win was gone. Then, still operating under his delusion of winning Maroczy's a pawn, Cohn erred with 24. Qb2 (24. Nxd6 still left him with a slightly better game) allowing Maroczy to come to life with a brilliant exchange sacrifice (24...RxB). If anything, Maroczy--who picked up a Bishop plus a pawn and the attack for his sacrificed Rook--now had the somewhat better chances.

The Tournament Book concluded that Cohn's game was lost after Maroczy's exchange sacrifice. In fact, what remained was a very unbalanced position. Fritz gives Black only a slight edge, and I would venture to say that Magnus Carlsen would have won the position after 25...Rxf4 from either side.

But Cohn's remaining play was feeble. His 26. Qe2 was silly (26. h3 protecting the vulnerable g pawn was indicated), and after Maroczy missed the powerful 27...e5, Cohn gave White two connected passed pawns in the center with 28. cxd5 (28. Kh1 protecting the King was much better). Even then, Cohn probably was not lost.

The game essentially ended with Cohn's suicidal 29. Nd3. Although the Tournament Book has no problem with this move, it in fact hands Maroczy a lethal pin through Cohn's Rook. Fritz' evaluation of the position before 29. Nd3 was (-0.53). After this blunder (29. Rf1 being best) Fritz rates the game as (-7.22). In other words, this was the losing move in this game.

After his blunder on move 29, Cohn seemed hell-bent on creating a help-mate position. His remaining play is otherwise inexplicable, and his 34. RxB walked into a forced mate.

Maroczy's opening play in this game was not good, but with a few glitches, his play after move 15 was inspired. He defended well when Cohn had the edge, and his exchange sacrifice on move 24 was clearly the highlight of the game. While he missed 27...e5 (his 27...Qb6 gave Cohn equal chances), from then on he ruthlessly exploited every one of Cohn's mistakes.

This win moved Maroczy into a tie for first place in the tournament with Janowski (who drew this round with Showalter) at 4.5 points apiece in five games.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The Two Chess Careers of Geza Maroczy
by Resignation Trap
Round Five, June 5th
from London 1899 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Round Five, June 5th
from London 1899 by suenteus po 147

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC