Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Geza Maroczy vs Emanuel Lasker
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 7, Mar-25
Alekhine Defense: Scandinavian Variation (B02)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 38 times; par: 52 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Maroczy/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
May-30-03  Benjamin Lau: "Lasker the Classicist as Hypermodernist."

The first (I think) and one of the only chessgames Lasker played from the hypermodern side.

May-30-03  aulero: Obviously 1...Nf6 was a successful psychological trick, Maroczy rejected the challenge and the opening became a French.

There is nothing of hypermodern in the Lasker's play. The game is indeed a good illustration of Lasker main feature: the tactical skill. Just look at the position after the 19th move. Who can imagine that White lost the game and only 10 moves after?

Maroczy, a very strong master, started an attack with 20.f5, but Lasker quickly and easily refuted it. Yes, Lasker has been the most resourceful player of history.

May-30-03  ughaibu: Lasker's game with Tartakower at St. Petersburg 1909 has been described as hypermodern although played before hypermodernism was codified.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Maroczy's 23Bxf5? is horrible. What was he thinking?
May-30-03  drukenknight: calli means 22 Bxf5. Is that so bad? Count the connected pawns. The same. Count the passed pawns, the same. Is the game so lost?

What about 23 Qb3?

in the opening Marcozy loses time with 5 Ne2 I guess he is worried about the pin. But he could get a sort of Albin Chatard attack (french defense) by transposition w/ 5 h4 Bb4 6 Bg5

because of his 5th move, the whole game he is playing w/ his QR still on its original square while laskers has moved. I havent studied the whole game to see if there was a way to catch up in development.

May-30-03  Benjamin Lau: <aulero>, good eye. I didn't see how it became French. But I still kind of get a hypermodern vibe from this game for some reason, maybe because of the knights hiding behind the pawns. <ugahibu>, I can't find the 1909 game. Is it in the database?
May-30-03  ughaibu: BenjaminLau: No I cant find it here either. I think you can get all Lasker's games here:
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <drukenknight> Bxf5 not only eliminates the weakness at e6, but actually creates a strong point where the pawn controls e4. Black plays the rook to e4 attacking d4 isolated pawn. Soon white's game collapses. A positional blunder!

On 23 Qb3 then be6 threatening Na4. This is why Maroczy played Nf4 first. His 25 Nh4 was also bad, but its probably lost anyway.

May-31-03  drukenknight: Calli: 23 Qb3 Be6 24 Nf6+
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: 24. Nf6+ gxf6 - just loses the knight. I don't see anything there.
Jun-02-03  drukenknight: calli: our line continues with 24...d5
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Then 24...Bf7 and the d5 pawn is pinned.
Jun-06-03  drukenknight: 25 Rg1 if I am remembering this correctly, I dont have enuf time to set this up, this is what I remember from the other day.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Still don't see it. 25. Rg1 Bc5 (attacking the rook) 26. Rd1(virtually forced because of Bxd5) 26... Nb4 followed by N or B takes at d5. Black is whole piece up and he has the attack too. Try it out, White is busted in this line.
Dec-02-04  kostich in time: Once more, Lasker the hypnotist, psyching the master of defence into trying a premature attack.
Dec-02-04  euripides: As <Calli> says, 22 Bxf5 is positionally bad. But if 22 Nc3 Black may have the option of 22 ...Ncxd4 e.g. 23 Nxd4 Bc5 and I think Black ends up winning material because of the threats of discovery by Bc6+.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <ughaibu>

I am three + years late to the conversation, but here is the Tartakower-Lasker 1909 game.

Tartakower vs Lasker, 1909

Doesn't strike me as hypermodern from the Black side. But this 1924 effort does.

Tartakower vs Lasker, 1924

There is also this interesting game that you linked to long ago.

Blackburne vs Lasker, 1899

Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Has anyone noticed that Lasker did not make a single move with his Queen during this game?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Infohunter: <GrahamClayton: Has anyone noticed that Lasker did not make a single move with his Queen during this game?>

I noticed that back in 1981, when I first played this game over.

Feb-11-09  JG27Pyth: Lasker was such a peculiar chess player. He never ceases to surprise me.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <aulero: Obviously 1...Nf6 was a successful psychological trick, Maroczy rejected the challenge and the opening became a French.>

Soltis points out that Lasker had a sensible reason for playing 1....Nf6 -- this game from Round 2: Maroczy vs Alekhine, 1924

<kostich in time: Once more, Lasker the hypnotist, psyching the master of defence into trying a premature attack. >

How? Did the sight of the French Defense send Maroczy into paroxysms of aggression? Doesn't look like it.

Repertoire Explorer: Geza Maroczy (white)

Dec-13-14  Ulhumbrus: Instead of 14 exf6, 14 b3 keeps the N on b6 out of play
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Morning: Fascinating how a single good defensive move changes the complexion of the entire game. After 21...Bd6!, Black has developed all 7 of his pieces to useful squares, while White suddenly has zero attacking chances, two pieces undeveloped, and weak squares all over the King side. 22.Bxf5 makes everything worse, turning the Re8 into the most powerful piece on the board, and it seems appropriate that it should have the final word.

Incidentally, it probably wasn't a good idea to give Lasker Rook odds, either. You don't think that Ra1 actually exists, do you?

May-28-15  ToTheDeath: 20.f5?? just horrible. Lasker refuted it like a Rhino batting away a fly.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Book of Samurai's favorite games 2
by Book of Samurai
Alekhine Def., Scandinavian/French (B02) 0-1Rook interference!
from yCommunity P-K4 Combined by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 83
from Wonders and Curiosities of Chess (Chernev) by Qindarka
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
Fredthebear labeled 125 Minis & 300 Destruktors
by fredthebear
lasker best games
by brager
Round 7 March 25th
from New York 1924 by JoseTigranTalFischer
April, p. 86 [Game 71 / 4533]
from American Chess Bulletin 1924 by Phony Benoni
Round 7 March 25th
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by StoppedClock
Game 27
from World Champion - Lasker (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Game #36
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
from deniznba's favorite games by deniznba
#197 - Lasker's queen stays at home
from "Wonders and Curiosities of Chess" - Pt 1 by GrahamClayton

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC