Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Frank Marshall vs Rudolf Swiderski
Monte Carlo (1904), Monte Carlo MNC, rd 8, Feb-16
French Defense: Exchange. Monte Carlo Variation (C01)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Marshall/Swiderski games
sac: 28.Rd1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-22-05  be3292: Gee <mrvocab>, I lived in Japan for a year, and I thought that tsuji meant when you run for the back door because the husband is coming in the front door, and you discover there is no back door. Tsuji!
Feb-22-05  erikcu: Welcome to the OK coral. I was looking for a total coral with the bishop at first, but then realized that the king could just take that knight. I'm glad this was a bit easier than yesterday's.
Feb-22-05  erikcu: Yeah, wow I just looked at the whole game. What a sucker punch. What is that term for getting hung by your own rope?
Feb-22-05  Backward Development: Yeah, too bad I recognize this one from "Combinations: The Heart of Chess." A Classic example of "A Sting in The Tail"
Feb-22-05  your brilliance: <ericku> Perhaps the term you seek is "hoist by his own petard." A petard was an explosive filled metal cone attached to city walls and gates to bring them down. If you got stuck on your own petard in the process of attaching it to the enemy's gates, you were indeed in deep yogurt!
Feb-22-05  Nickisimo: That really stinks when you think you have a clever tactic only to realize that it didn't quite work out the way you'd hoped. Poor Swiderski.
Feb-22-05  MoonlitKnight: The notation on move 28 could have read "Set a trap which my opponent fell into."
Feb-22-05  EyesofBlue: Stop the world I want to get off.... actually got one right.
Feb-22-05  Shubes82: I have seen a decent amount of position like this, involving the knight venturing to the edge of the board to grab a piece. It is usually against 1700 rated players or less, as they fail to calculate far enough to see exactly how things will turn out. My advice would be careful calculation when attempting any manuever than puts a knight at any edge of the baord, epecially deep in enemy territory. I expected better from Swiderski!
Feb-22-05  kevin86: There is an endgame trap where a bishop can completely lock in a knight:When the knight is on a side square-and the bishop is three squares away,the bishop can guard all 4 of the knights possible move eg.♗d4-opposing ♘a4 or d1

This game is a variation of the theme.

It looks like blacks calvary flew into a piece of flypaper-how's that for a mixed metaphor?

Feb-22-05  Seraphina: In this case it seemed fairly "obvious". Of course, there are GMs who simply stop calculating far enough (I think there is a Timman-Karpov game with that theme in it)... Anyway, Schues, Swiderski has had time now to mull over his error!
Feb-22-05  notyetagm: 32 c4 and 33 ♔e2 and the trapped knight goes bye-bye.
Feb-22-05  notyetagm: <You've got to be really careful when you leave a knight at the edge of the board or with no retreat at the end of a tactical sequence.> If the knight gets trapped, then you may end up losing material. Marshall's opponent thinks he has won a pawn but ends losing a knight, not a good trade.
Feb-22-05  MindlessOne: such a simple endgame idea. This one was almost too easy
Feb-22-05  sinthetiq: neat trap!
Feb-22-05  aw1988: <Looks like Swideski calculated exactly 3 moves deep before deciding on 29. Qxg2+.> I couldn't agree more.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beenthere240: After Marshall's simplification beginninng with 26. Rbd1, black suddenly finds himself in a tricky situation after 29. Qxd1. White threatens mate a backrow mate and black's knight is loose. 29. ...h6 drops the knight to 30. Qd8+ and31 Q-d3.
29....Qc8 protects everything, but after 30. Qa4, the knight has to retreat and black's hope for a win looks bleak. 29. Q-e8 isn't very pretty, either, eg 30. Qe2 threatening the knight and black's queen. Of course both these queen moves are better than 29....Qg2+, but I think I can understand how black, who must have been hoping for a win, went wrong.
Feb-22-05  DP12: To say he calculated three moves is a bit oversimplification sometimes we just overlook some simple move in the middle of our long sequence after all I doubt he was not worried about the knight and was probably was thinking something deep like Nxd1 Ke2 Nb2 Bb8 a6 Ba7 etc. He was satisfied in this line and then stopped thinking about white's other moves.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beenthere240: As I look into the position, I'm not sure that black isn't losing anyway. If 29....Qc8, 30 Qb3 is a better idea than in my previous post since it forces 30....Nxd5, which gives white a dominating position assuring at least a draw.
Feb-26-06  LluviaSean: Oh wow...the knight got schooled!!
Jul-29-09  WhiteRook48: 29...Qxg2+
looks like he didn't know "a knight on the rim is grim"
Jan-09-10  bengalcat47: Looks like this could be another example of a Marshall "swindle!"
Jan-17-16  kenilworthian: I am pretty sure that this game gave the 4.c4 line the "Monte Carlo" moniker, but it is a terrible example of the line.
Premium Chessgames Member
  dernier loup de T: In his book "Combinations", Irving Chernev gives the position after the 29th white move and the faulty reaction of Black as example for a "boomerang combination"; instructive as ever in the good books of this author; only reproach: he gives the positions played in the 1906 Nuremburg Tournament ...
Premium Chessgames Member
  dernier loup de T: Correction: ".. he gives the position as played.." and so on; let's notice that White must answer 32.c4! immediately: a delay would save Black: so, if 32.Ke4 Kg8! and the win is no more possible: White has to catch the knight before attacking the black queen side pawns
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
32. c4! was set up by the trap Black fell into after 28. Rd1!?
from Trapped Piece by patzer2
knight forks way into trap.
from unique themes three by kevin86
32.? - 22feb
from Puzzles 2005 part 1 - 01jan-.......... by andychess
Bishop vs. Knight (not for very long)
from Endgames to Study by starscream74
Is this the original "Monte Carlo Variation"?
from French Defense, Monte Carlo Exchange Variation by kenilworthian
Marshall Martials
by chocobonbon
Strategic battles
by TheDestruktor
Monte Carlo 1904
by suenteus po 147
French Exchange. Monte Carlo birth?(C01) 1-0 N corralled on rim
from 99 1900s Grandmasters Annointed Jack by fredthebear
Diagram 63
from T. Czarnecki. Chess book "Szach i Mat" by Sebastian88
32.? (Tuesday, February 22)
from Puzzle of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
32.? (February 22, 2005)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
trapped or restricted pieces
by obrit
French Exchange. Monte Carlo birth?(C01) 1-0 N corralled on rim
from M&M players... it's a mixed bag of FTB flavors N by fredthebear
Bishop vs. Knight (not for very long)
from Endgames to Study by xajik

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC